Andalusians & Lusitanos for dressage

If you were going to go out to buy a dressage prospect would you start your search with Andalusians & Lusitanos? I was just discussing this the other day with a friend. We were wondering why we don’t see more of them and we were discussing the pros and cons of the breed. I realized I don’t know enough about them to even guess why they are a rare breed.

I know there are a few in competition but it seems most people looking for a dressage prospect are looking for a warmblood, trakener or wb/tb cross. Say your goal was to be competitive, not just to ride a pretty horse with a flowing mane. You want to bring along a 3/4yr old with the hope that it will be your limitation that prevents you from Grand Prix, not the horse. Why don’t more people buy Andies & Lusitanos? Is it lack of availability or high cost? I’ve seen some really nice, well trained individuals but perhaps they are too hot when they are young for the average rider? Do their gaits not extend as well as the more traditional dressage breeds? I’m basically wondering why there aren’t more dressage riders actively seeking them out, perhaps there is something I don’t know.

Apologies to Andi & Lusi fans for what I am about to say - but - most of them move like sewing machines on speed.:wink:

Yes, they are trainable so with a decent rider they’ll learn all the ‘tricks.’
But a horse with cadence, lift and bigger paces will always look better.

I thought that Andalusians & Lusitanos were the breed that the ‘art of dressage’ was invented with? Were they once great movers and this has been bred out of them or has dressage changed so much that they no longer fit? I thought their natural head carriage and hind legs underneath them made them ideal for it. A lot of warmblood lines are good for both dressage & jumpers and you certainly don’t see too many Andies jumping so I guess there must be some conformational differences. How differently are these Baroque breeds built compared to WBs? There also aren’t too many Andie/WB crosses that I know of so maybe their conformation doesn’t complement each other? Any Andie/Lusitano/WB breeders out there? I don’t know much about Andies & Lusitanos, and I personally thought that I haven’t seen too many in competition because they are rare.

Oh, and in case you’re looking at my profile and thinking my horse experience is all from New Zealand, I’m actually from Canada, I’m just working in NZ at the moment.

Oh thank god for that.Now I can take you seriously being from Canada and all LOL
We do know a couple of things about horses this side of the world.
Ive seen a couple of WB/Andie crosses and they havent worked out.Very heavy and still seemed to have retained the high knee action.These were with more of an old fashioned type of WB though.Perhaps with a more modern type the cross may be a little more successful.

Ya, I guess my comment did seem like a knock against New Zealanders (Kiwis) but it wasn’t intentional. I’m new here and I have no idea what types of horses are around, my knowledge of what I’ve seen in the dressage ring is limited to Canada. Although, I’d like to know what’s available in Wellington so please do PM me if you’re familiar with the area.

Good to know about the Andie/WB cross. I thought it could be a good thing but by ‘coarse’ I’m picturing a horse with a large barrel, one I could not get my leg around.

Would I get one? Sure? The last time around, though, I didn’t. The cost of a real sport type is so out of this world right now, that I couldn’t afford one. My guess is that a really correct dressage Lusitano, able to be fluid, collect, extend and work over his back at any level of dressage, costs about 30%-40% more than a comparable warmblood.

‘the original dressage horse’

Depends on who you ask. If you ask some Andy/Lusitano breeders they will say that (and that warmbloods are stupid elephants and you don’t want one), but actually if you study a little bit, you might find out something else. That both breeds’ founders were originally developed as multi-purpose horses.

Is that just propaganda from breeders who want to market their horses to cutters, reiners, jumpers, dressagies and pleasure riders? Could be. That’s the other side’s argument. :lol:

But of course, ‘dressage’ has also changed, with its emphasis on transitions and ‘athleticism’ (being able to extend and collect the stride almost immediately) may actually be a very, very different critter from the dressage of 400-200 years ago.

Collection is still required, but transitions and fluidity have become a major requirement too. This changes the ballgame.

A great many Andalusians and Lusitanos DO have ‘sewing machine gaits’.

Some of them, that’s the only way they can move. There are individuals that have very ‘poor gaits for dressage’, tight, restricted, up and downy trot strides, short, jerky lateral walks, and lateral, restricted choppy canter strides.

But there are also a great many individuals who have been trained incorrectly - rushed into collection (‘because they are the original dressage horse, they can piaffe at 3 without any fundamentals being established (or muscles being built!)’).

They COULD move far better, but are rushed into very incorrect upper level work by ignorant owners, who believe the myth that some breeds do not need basics in dressage. There is a whole population of trainers who cater to them, and reinforce their beliefs, and teach them to work their horses with dropped backs, hocks behind them at mincing extremely sideways positions and the horse’s necks pulled in and telescoped, and convince eager, ignorant people that that’s ‘classical’. Then we have many others just watching videos on youtube and training their horses to piaffe and passage with no previous developmental work at all, no basics, no muscle training, and no supervision.

Oldbag, can you really blame the horse breed for ‘unsuitability’ when they are trained this way?

Like most glamorous ‘fad’ breeds (Friesian is another one), there are a great many very unsuitable, inferior animals being sold simply because they are pretty and many beginners have no idea what to look for in a dressage horse (and believe that OTHER myth, that ‘the other horses just win because the judges are so unfair’).

There are people out there selling Andalusians and Lusitanos who have a very practical, sensible view of their animals and who understand dressage and have experience in it.

And there are a great many MORE people selling very average individuals who are not particularly suitable for dressage, and are beating their chests about how perfect their horses are and how bad other breeds (chiefly warmbloods) suck.

Group 1 is rare. Group 2 is very common in the Lusitano and Andalusian world, and Marengo, they are shooting themselves in the foot and driving people away, but so are the inflated prices.

my post is in response to the OP

I am looking at Lipizzans for a young prospect. I decided to not look at Andalusians and Lusitanos because they were too flamboyant for my taste. When you move away from the warmblood breeds to select a dressage horse it becomes a very individual decision and based on the unique experience that you want to have with the Dressage journey.

Andalusians and Lusitanos are beautiful to watch, but my heart is pulled to the Lipizzan as my choice for the classical breed.

OP, I show in California - definately a big “dressage state”. While Warmbloods are still in the majority in most classes, we DO see many of the Baroque horses - Andalusians and Friesians, and in much smaller numbers, Lusitanos and Lippizans. And we see some darn nice Baroque horses. I can speak much more about the Andies and Friesians because I see many of them (and know trainers and breeders who breed and ride them)… We DO see some who are not well suited for dressage - I do see some Andies that are rather “trappy” in their movement, and some Friesians who are badly strung out behind. But we also see some that are quite NICE - and are beating many of the Warmbloods.

We also see Warmbloods who are like sewing machines, or strung out behind, or flat movers - there are representatives of ALL breeds that just don’t do well in dressage. The real trick is to recognize good gaits and be able to TRAIN the horse properly. Too often, inexperienced riders are drawn to the “fairytale” horses (Baroque breeds) because of their gentle temperments and romantic good looks - and they don’t invest in proper training.

I see a lot of nice Baroque horses trucking around beginner riders - they aren’t well ridden or trained, but the riders are happy, they love their horses, and they gain confidence and start learning the basics, get exposed to the show ring, etc. I don’t think that is a bad thing at all - but it does help contribute to the thought that the Baroque breeds don’t do as well in the sports.

When you see a nice one, well ridden, it is stunning - the Baroque breeds do tend to have more talent in the collected work, and often less in the extended gaits, but I’ve seen some that were world class, stunning horses even at the mid levels where the emphasis is more on the medium and extended gaits. And they are winning. But a world class horse, irregardless of breed is EXPENSIVE. And good training, even for a mid-quality horse is EXPENSIVE. And talented FEI riders and trainers are rare!

Since many of the Baroque horses do better at the collected work - but few RIDERS make it to the FEI levels where collected work is highlighted, we seldom see the Baroque breeds perform at their strengths.

And there are less breeders breeding Baroque horse for dressage (well, there are less Baroque horses bred for ANYTHING). There are far fewer Andalusians born in the US than there are Hannoverians - far fewer Baroque horses than Warmbloods. So the prices tend to be higher - although prices are coming down as number of horses being bred in the US increase - I don’t see them as that much more expensive anymore. But again, I’m coming from the West Coast, different market…

I do think the Baroque breeds are more “accepted” on the West Coast than they are in the Mid-West and East Coast. By the way - I’ve not seen many judges who were breed biased - I do ride Baroque (not Andies though) and have probably run into TWO or THREE judges in my entire riding career (and I do show a lot) that were clearly biased - it doesn’t just show up in their scores, but in their comments and conversations (and luckily, one of them retired:yes:). Generally, I find judges to be open minded to all breeds - if the horse moves well, is ridden well, and trained well, they score well!

from the POV of currently showing an Andi at FEI, i completely agree. i just bolded some bits that i think bears repeating

FX says it well.

As far as the extended gaits, extension should come FROM collection. What you see at lower levels (floaty front end or toe flicking at 1st level lengthens) is a natural movement for some conformations. Of course there are many (heated) disagreements about the degree of correctness of that. But it LOOKS good…

When you correctly train a baroque horse through the back, and they develop strength, and develop collection, the extensions come right along with it. And done correctly, they will be just as competitive as other types of movers because the extensions will be correct, and the collection will shine.

Now, it can be harder to get many baroque horses through the back, because they have a knack for arching their neck and looking pretty. :wink:

Many will argue no difference in schools, but I find that a French/Portuguese school teacher/trainer will often be more able to deal with this type of holding in the back.

Temperament is different. In the way GOOD Arabs or Traks are different, IME. They should be both calm and very light. Not every rider likes a very light horse. That is very individual.

I am very lucky to ride and be around quite a few world class Lusos, but also breed baroque sporthorses of other breeds/crosses myself. I prefer a baroque horse. Just what I like. I’ve an Azteca (1/2 luso) in the oven, a Spanish Colonial filly, and my ArabX’s are baroque in build and movement–and typically in temperament and the training style they respond best to. My young gelding when introduced to side reins ‘put himself in position’ immediately and looked like a finished horse. It made me chuckle, then we reviewed forward and went to ground driving with a live contact on the reins, because I don’t want him “in position” (as pretty as he looks) I want him seeking the bit and over the back. :wink:

I love the baroque style horses. They are just too fun.

However that said. When I worked in Belgium, I was lucky enough to get to know Nuno O. Who used to ‘fly’ by to teach a few riders. I remember one day at lunch this discussion, how as lovely as the baroque horses were, and while yes bred for dressage.

They weren’t what was ‘winning’ at the moment. (keep in mind, this is a 20 yr old conversation) That like everything else, preferences or fads come and go - and like any discipline, people will go with what it more common/acceptable/desired’ at any given time frame in the ‘life’ of a sport.

Which to me made sense. The time & money invested in a sport, you need to consider what the best bang for your buck will be regarding horse type. (I’m talking the elites of course) Personally I keep talking myself out of any baroque breeds I see up for sale round here, only because I don’t think I can explain yet another horse to the hubby. :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=FriesianX;3809092]
When you see a nice one, well ridden, it is stunning - the Baroque breeds do tend to have more talent in the collected work, and often less in the extended gaits, but I’ve seen some that were world class, stunning horses even at the mid levels where the emphasis is more on the medium and extended gaits. And they are winning. But a world class horse, irregardless of breed is EXPENSIVE. And good training, even for a mid-quality horse is EXPENSIVE. And talented FEI riders and trainers are rare![/QUOTE]

Something to consider here…
If it really were true that Andies and Lusos are equally talented for dressage, why aren’t more Pros riding them? Especially the ones where money is no object and winning is everything? Somehow I have difficulty picturing Anky or Isabel on an Iberian. :wink:

[QUOTE=jdeboer01;3809931]
Something to consider here…
If it really were true that Andies and Lusos are equally talented for dressage, why aren’t more Pros riding them? Especially the ones where money is no object and winning is everything? Somehow I have difficulty picturing Anky or Isabel on an Iberian. ;)[/QUOTE]

Maybe cause they’d get bucked off as that RK crap would ruin these sensitive horses. As someone said earlier, the current fad is for WBs - horses bred in the country which is the home of most competitive dressage - hmm, figure that one out.

There are lots of PRE, Portuguese and other baroques that do move well for dressage (just have to look for them). Shoot, I’m an amateur rider and when I went looking specifically for a dressage mount, I chose Andalusians (1 pre, later a psp). Just couldn’t get excited for WBs and I’m glad I did as they’ve been great to work with and have taught me tons (non of mine move like sewing machines). Let me ask others, how many WBs naturally come to collection, and offer piafe or passage? There are some on this board who’ll deny that this can be so. To them I say, maybe you’ve never ridden a fit Andi. Yes, they must be trained to do it consistently and within the framework of a test, but I’ve sat pretty much every GP movement on one or the other of my horses over the years, just by them offering during the right moment.

The baroque horses are gaining in popularity and their prices have come down, which means you’ll probably see more in the arena.

Oh and I saw several Hannovarian-PRE crosses at Paul Belasik’s farm that I’m drooling over. Lovely shoulders and hind ends. Great movers. Drool.

[QUOTE=jdeboer01;3809931]
Something to consider here…
If it really were true that Andies and Lusos are equally talented for dressage, why aren’t more Pros riding them? Especially the ones where money is no object and winning is everything? Somehow I have difficulty picturing Anky or Isabel on an Iberian. ;)[/QUOTE]

Anky and Isabelle ride horses that are bred and promoted in their countries from their countries’ stud farms. Several big name pros DO ride Baroque horses. The U.S. had an Andalusian short listed for the Team. Invasor was on the Spanish team. Sabine Schutt Kerry rode several Friesians to FEI levels. Kim Monk (again, CA trainer) took a Friesian to USDF HOY (NOT All Breeds, HOY!) at every level through 4th before he was sold as an FEI schoolmaster to a young rider. I know of several big name, highly respected people - judges and trainers - who ride Friesians, Friesian crosses, and Andalusians. I suspect if Lusitanos were more easily obtained in the US, I’d see these more often too. As these horses are more and more bred for MODERN DRESSAGE, you see more and more of them competing with ammies and pros. And I’m seeing more and more pros - again, I’m in CA, so what I see is the California market - accepting these horses as talented dressage prospects.

I don’t dismiss the athletic abilities of the well bred Warmblood, but I also believe the Baroques have something to add to the competitive dressage equation, and as prices go down, and modern movement is bred into the horses, I suspect we’ll see more and more of the pros appreciating these horses.

I realize you prefer the Warmbloods - but not everyone does, and it is becoming more common to see the Warmbloods beaten by the Baroques in the show ring. A nice horse is a nice horse.

[QUOTE=FriesianX;3810588]
Anky and Isabelle ride horses that are bred and promoted in their countries from their countries’ stud farms.[/QUOTE]

I sincerely doubt that patriotism has anything to do with their choice of horse. These competitors are in it to win. They will pick the horse that will most easily help them achieve their goals. When Anky starts competing at Reining, you can bet your bosom she’ll be riding an American Quarter Horse.

Well, if you’re going to argue that Anky and Isabel ride Warmbloods from their country’s stud farms, then why doesn’t the same apply for the Spanish? Shouldn’t they be representing their countries with Spanish horses? Two of the three Spanish competitors in Beijing were riding Warmbloods (one withdrew, however, due to injury). Plus, it’s beginning to look like there are at least SOME PRE breeders that agree there’s room for improvement within the breed. Did you see this stallion from the big PSI auction this past December? He sold for somewhere around 80,000 Euro. He’s by a PRE stallion out of a Florestan mare. My guess is that his breeder is hoping PRE mare owners will consider him.

http://www.psi-auktion.de/englisch/s535403.html

In all honesty, Friesians and Iberians have very little in common. Sure, I guess maybe they look a TINY bit similar in conformation, but other than the hair, and the arbitrary term “baroque” – nada. Friesians are historically carriage/harness horses and Iberians are historically riding horses. Their weaknesses as far as competitive dressage go, are practically polar opposites.

I think that, from a breeding standpoint, it’s 100% the other way around. I believe that a Warmblood will improve a “baroque” far more than a “baroque” will improve a Warmblood.

Au contraire! Friesians are my passion! However, I’m realistic about the reasons as to why the vast majority of BNT aren’t riding them. By breeding my Friesian mares to proven Warmblood dressage sires, and then breeding the best of those offspring (fillies) back to proven Friesian dressage sires, I’m hoping to gradually improve the Friesian. Although they won’t be “purebred”, part of my goal is to maintain the “look” of a purebred.

Somehow I have difficulty picturing Anky or Isabel on an Iberian. :wink:

Pick up a copy of Dressage in Lightness. I’ll get the page # in the morning, but there you’ll SEE Isabel on an Iberian.

:wink:

Is it a competition photo?

I have a Lusi cross

She is a weanling in the clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQuBKjJ_oJo&feature=channel_page

I think she is a pretty good cross and preserves the best of both parents. Temperament is a tempered baroque - willing, smart, not a horse you are going to “make” do stuff but very willing to think about it, figure it out and give you what you want, you just can’t bully her into it like some other breeds I have worked with. Her mom is same, a little more “fight” in her but very willing and sensible, super sensitive to aids, no bucking no rearing no bolting, but you definitely know when you have crossed the line.

My exp. with baroque horses is fairly limited, so this is from a sample of 1.5 plus observing lots of Lippis.

I agree that Iberian horses tend not to display the same ability for extension that Warmbloods do. They tend to show more ability for collection.

Of course, these are generalisations, and not specific to every horse in either breed.

It doesn’t mean that the Iberian horse doesn’t have a place in modern dressage / dressage competition, either. It probably means that individual horses (and therefore the ‘breed’) will have less ‘success’ in competition until they reach the upper levels - assuming the rider has the skills and talent to get there in the first place.

I imagine that the Iberian breeds suffer just as much from not having enough talented &/or dedicated riders to get the horses ‘to the top’ as the WBs do.

I did a quick google search for some PRE stallions; I don’t think they are showing ‘sewing machine’ movement.

http://www.extremadurapre.com/web/contenido/04socios/fichas/144dhcabezarubia/fotos/tarugo.jpg

http://www.ancce.es/panelc_apw/spaw/uploads/images/fuego-odense.jpg

http://www.topiberian.es/files/noticias/guardadamas1CMYK.jpg

http://www.elpre.com/media/fotos/brcxopkl.jpg

http://www.elpre.com/media/fotos/brcxopkl.jpg

In the above link that Calliope posted (thankyou by the way! great photos).

Explain for me what looks like a hyper extension of the front leg starting from the shoulder.

What is causing it

Is it good, bad?

How would you prevent it?

I am hoping for some thoughtful answers that well help me with this. I never know when I see it if it is not desired or it is.

thanks!