Read again. I said I HAVE read the CoC but not the rest of the related document(s). See how you didn’t even get what I was saying I had done and above wrote it as the very opposite of what I said?
What you are saying makes no legal sense to me. Your argument is: if an organisation is underfunded, they don’t need to uphold any of the rules and regulations under which people joined and paid their membership fees.
Where do you get this idea that underfunded orgs are allowed to do nothing b/c they are underfunded. That’s an issue they must address and resolve. They are not allowed to completely abdicate their responsibilities to their members b/c they are short on cash. Do you see how that isn’t legal at all? Entities could simply hide funds so that none of them ever had to act on their own principles. That makes no sense. No legal system allows that.
And someone. not you already graciously offered to send me the remaining docs to read. These aren’t difficult documents at all. But if you cared and you’re a member, you could have sent them to me, too.
All those people you note are problematic. But that does not mean the USEF has nothing it needs to do. It must uphold the standards you all signed on for. It can’t hide behind anything in it’s drive not to, esp not finances.
Finances DO NOT MATTER with respect to the duty of an organisation to uphold its rules and standards. It’s not optional, only for the well funded orgs. All orgs must operate according to their constitutional documents and must uphold their rules and standards. Crying poverty does not change that duty. Do you see how that is an utterly nonsensical legal position?