[QUOTE=beowulf;8674307]
Sorry if it doesn’t make sense to you - what doesn’t make sense to me is that they’d make claims like that without substantiating it. Diverting the pressure from one area to another is not always beneficial especially when the sides of the poll are where there is a network of nerves and tissue. There is not a whole lot of tissue over the poll, but to the side of it exactly where the rounded disks of the bridle sit there are several important structures responsible for flexion, bend and movement of the neck and ears.
The thing is, the pressure at a standstill is not the problem. Try running your hand through it while you are on course.
Just my two cents. I haven’t had any luck with Antares, for the price you’d think they’d offer the client some sort of quality control.[/QUOTE]
I have actually grabbed the crown of this bridle at a brisk canter on a cross country course to fix a fly bonnet that came loose specifically because the crownpiece wasn’t able to hold it on. You can still get your hand under it enough to shove an earnet back underneath it…
I don’t know that this is any different than the Micklem claims, which if anything I think are crap because the poll pressure in that bridle is quite high.
However poll pressure is not the only thing - some horses hate the crownpiece sitting on the bottom of their ears (mine is one) and this doesn’t do that, either.
Basically everything in the horse world is “unproven” so I think it’s odd to apply that standard to some equipment but not to others. There’s no sense in doing scientific studies on a product for such a small market, a market that becomes infinitely smaller when you are talking about a $630 bridle.
My bridle is excellent quality and the service they gave me was excellent, but I bought it from Thierry directly. I’ve bought all my Antares items direct from them and have had no problems dating back about 5 years.