Barisone Aftermath: Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity, And Then

[trubandloki]

@Seeker1

Butter99…oh the policeman who saved her said she coded once and I believe someone told me she also coded in the hospital. Two times.

@Seeker1

That is what I was told… but what do I know.

@Seeker1

Maybe there is more than one horse witih that name or maybe I got the name wrong.

@Seeker1

Things can get confusing with so much information in so many places.

I am sure the drugs make it harder to remember too.

@Seeker1

oh well it seems to be the thing do do around here. People spread misinformation al over the place without regard to the consequences. I am not the sharpest tack in the drawer Ill admit. Sorry.

[eggbutt]

Neruda cdi5 gps

[Ghazzu]

@Seeker1

I guess last time you lost 50 % of your blood due to being shot and dying twice, you might have dreamed you were in a helicopter too. Oh no… that didn’t happen to you, it happened to LAUREN.

Since you have not experienced a 50% loss of blood volume, could you please explain the etiology of your fantastic tales?

[Seeker1]

Well I am so sorry. I did not mean to cause anyone a problem.

[MHM]

[Ghazzu]

@Seeker1

but what do I know.

apparently, not a great deal that is factual.

[Seeker1]

Oh I guess the etiology of coding can be caused from many things. In this case it was from bleeding out or something like that. Not sure cause I am not a doctor.

[LilRanger]

@Seeker1

. no one should delight in harmful, cruel or mean behavior. But no one listens to me.

This sounds like a true statement, but I think it’s not really directed at this board?

[Seeker1]

RIght… you are probably right. Kinda like most of the “alternative facts” many of you post ad nauseum without ever admitting it or saying you are sorry.

[Ghazzu]

@ekat

Don’t forget drinking bleach.

given the propensity of the Kanawreck clan for hyperbole, it was most likely chlorinated water from the tap.

[Seeker1]

Not sure what you mean Lilly

[Seeker1]

Ghazza… don’t take me seriously if you don’t want to. No one here takes bashing my family very seriously. I can understand from whence cometh your lead.

[Seeker1]

ah… but you eggers… are helping so much with your posts… what exactly are you trying to accomplish eggster?

[Ghazzu]

@Seeker1

Ghazza… don’t take me seriously if you don’t want to. No one here takes bashing my family very seriously. I can understand from whence cometh your lead.

I’d settle for being able to determine whence cometh your word salad.
I can’t decide if the etiology is self-medication with intoxicants, prescription medications, or if has an organic cause.

It’s more sad than amusing, though.

[MHM]

Nashua, Neruda, 1950s race horse, 21st century dressage horse, potato, potahto.

[Seeker1]

Yes everything about this Ghazzaerie is a sad state of affairs. Especially your constant accusations of my drug use. I believe that is not quite right as I do not engage in that ever!!! I think You probably do though. It seems like it based on your irrational statements.

[LilRanger]

I’m sure you don’t, Seeker1. Carry on.

[erinmeri]

@DQHubby

Yes, I have read and agree, NGRI is not be punitive. The finding of the NJ Supreme court you quote also said the ‘verdict implies a finding that defendant has committed the actus reus’. The insanity finding shows ‘he did so without a criminal state of mind’. He still did the act, but because of the insanity he is not responsible thus ‘no crime to punish’. The actus reus did not just magically not happen, it did, and the jury agreed that it did happen.

Listen, I am about 800 posts behind (how??? It’s been one day!!! This thread is a crazy train that has the potential to make some other train wreck threads, including some Barisone ones, look like fender benders…but I digress) but I don’t think anyone is arguing with you about the semantics (perhaps I am wrong). BUT, what you are perhaps failing to understand is that the lack of acceptable forensics, the fishy stories that don’t match up to each other or the ear witness’s testimony or the flimsy forensics, the involvement of Rosie and her groin bites, the injuries sustained by the defendant, as well as the defendant’s inability to offer an alternative scenario (he does not remember!) ALL seem to all open a door to other scenarios that cast doubt on who pulled the trigger and under what circumstances. Perhaps someone else has explained this, but to many, it isn’t clear that the act took place in the manner and by the person that two unreliable witnesses claim it did.

Edited: does not, not “doesn’t not”. Sheesh!

[Angela_Freda]

It sure shows his dedication. I’m not sure that was her plan though.

[Seeker1]

Why thankyou Lil rangette for your permission to post. I really appreciate that. Talk about narcissism