Barisone Aftermath: Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity, And Then

[Rhythm_Pace_Impulsion]

Ugh I can’t find it amidst all the separated videos. If possible please link or at least screenshot the best of the tirade to share here later. Tia

[ekat]

NJ v. Michael Barisone Trial Day 4 - Cont'd Cross Exam of Lauren Kanarek -...

[ekat]

Here’s a highlight for you.

[Omgitsme]

There’sa comment from someone named Deborah Donner but my brain filled in “Downer.”
Debbie downer.

[ekat]

@Omgitsme

There’sa comment from someone named Deborah Donner but my brain filled in “Downer.”
Debbie downer

Me too!

[Omgitsme]

I don’t know these people but I like them.

[ekat]

Yeah, there are some great comments in there. Comments that make these threads look mighty nice and respectful!

[Scribbler]

Thank you for the sample. Yes, reading this I too deduct that there’s been some move towards banning her from competition.

I’m unsure why the psych facility needs to hear from her. She’s acting like she’s doing a victim impact statement for a sentencing hearing. Not the reality here.

[MHM]

I wonder if all the continued activity on the Law and Crime YouTube channel comments a month later will increase the odds that they will live stream the civil suit.

[ekat]

@Scribbler

I’m unsure why the psych facility needs to hear from her. She’s acting like she’s doing a victim impact statement for a sentencing hearing. Not the reality here.

There’s pages more. Should I post them?

[FitzE]

I wonder if that is true, that the psych eval needs to hear from her and, if so, what they need to hear (i.e., is it limited or can she throw anything out there she wants)?

[MHM]

@Scribbler

I’m unsure why the psych facility needs to hear from her.

You believed that comment had any basis in fact?

[ekat]

Ruthless comments I tell you!

[Omgitsme]

That’s tame compared to some!

[MHM]

Please don’t.

The Chronicle has banned her so we don’t need to read her blathering here. Anyone who wants to find it can see it on the YouTube channel.

[ekat]

@FitzE

I wonder if that is true, that the psych eval needs to hear from her and, if so, what they need to hear (i.e., is it limited or can she throw anything out there she wants)?

Not that I can find in NJ law. The continuing hearings are pretty clear. The State gets to have an expert. The defense can bring in witnesses to elaborate on a support system that would allow less restrictive confinement.

I could be missing something though.

[ekat]

@MHM

Please don’t.

The Chronicle has banned her so we don’t need to read her blathering here. Anyone who wants to find it can see it on the YouTube channel.

Ok.

[MHM]

Thank you.

Maybe people could post links so it’s easy to find it for those who have an interest.

[ekat]

@MHM

Thank you.

Maybe people could post links so it’s easy to find it for those who have an interest.

You’re welcome.

If I had a clue how to link straight to the comments I would.

[LiberalSnowflake]

@Scribbler

@Cat_Tap

I don’t believe for one second that seeker1 is Lauren’s mother. The title of this thread should be changed to “WTF”.

I agree. The first time Seeker1 posted back after the trial, I believed they were LK’s elderly mother as they identified themself.

I wasn’t sure last night as the posts spiraled down into weirdness. Today the flat out little jibes and insults do not sound at all like the person who posted after the trial or indeed last night. There could be various reasons for that, including personal psychological issues changing how the poster acts and presents themselves. Or that there are people sharing the account. Or that Seeker1 was never who they claimed to be.

We’ve been gamed in the past by posters on this thread like Inigo Montoya.

The title of the thread should be “Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity, and Then … More Insanity!”

It is possible that Seeker1 was never KK at all.

I agree that the tone of the comments has changed wildly in the past 24 hours or so, which would lead me to think that the writer is having some issues, or there are two (or more) people authoring the comments, BUT I think it must be KK at some point, or the Kanarek’s would be going platinum level BSC and threatening legal action. All the comments from Seeker1 are doing are making the family story much clearer to me - and not in a good way.