In Long Valley and the surrounding area including Frenchtown (to the south), full training board with an Olympian in 2019, would be, at a minimum, $3,500.00. That does NOT include an apartment, farrier, meds for horses, etc. Nor would it include private lessons…typically, group lessons. Privates would be with an assistant. LK got a steal of a deal, if that was what was actually agreed upon.
ETA: per horse.
I assume she would be asked to present 5 years of 1099’s, W-2’s, tax returns, whatever would prove she lost income. Certainly Barisone could produce his business records and total loss of income since August 2019 and potential future losses if he can’t build his business back up.
My complaint is that you were saying that **other **posters were writing some “nasty posts” (your words - not mine) about seahorse. I found the thread - Updated barisone lawsuit 10/29/21 post 851 post 2860. People THANKED her for offering her perspective, and asked a few polite questions which she answered. One poster did indeed look up her USDF record, and another poster corrected that initial poster by adding some correct info found via google. Not a single one of those posts were “Nasty.”
Thanks for sharing this. I like dealing with actual numbers.
$3500 x 4 = $14,000 (not inclusive of farrier, private lessons, living accommodations for people, etc)
Another question… in the summer of 2019 in Long Valley, NJ, if 3-4 stalls opened up at a facility like MBs, how long would it typically take to fill them?
Yeah, that part is pretty formulaic. You have to prove income at the moment of loss, and then they look back for a period of time based on industry, etc. Then if you’re claiming continued loss of future earnings for some period, based on medical records, they project out based on your past. So that number is usually never just random.
Apparently “nasty” is in the eye of the beholder unless they themselves are being nasty
Heck, even posts offering a positive light are considered nasty to this group!!
You questioned me, “Are you saying that [two lawyers perjured themselves and the judge and prosecutor stood by]?
I said nothing if the kind. Did not mention the word “perjury”. It was in the form of a clarifying question, but the nature of the question suggested I had accused someone of perjury.
As I understand it, to be perjury, an untrue statement given under oath must also be determined to be material to the issue at hand. I don’t know whether JK participated in the negotiations or not. I can’t really see how it’s material to whether MB shot LK or to MBs state of mind.
I appreciate your fully quoting the passage you were reacting to, so that I could clarify easily.
I am as guilty as anyone of responding to certain someones. But what happens if we all stop? Let’s just all click on ignore and see what happens… maybe they will all move on? I am getting tired of seeing certain posters behave like bots and I am disappointed in myself for replying. Challenge to self and others!
I’m wondering if people reach out to Law and Crime expressing interest in seeing the civil trial, if it would encourage L&C to reach out to judge to record it?
Do you imagine you’re fooling anyone, even your legions of friends, when you claim that your purpose was to refute any suggest of illicit employment of the human trafficking kind?