Barisone assessment

While I agree that we tend to be kind to one another, I STRONGLY disagree here. I have never put words in your mouth.

5 Likes

In Long Valley and the surrounding area including Frenchtown (to the south), full training board with an Olympian in 2019, would be, at a minimum, $3,500.00. That does NOT include an apartment, farrier, meds for horses, etc. Nor would it include private lessons…typically, group lessons. Privates would be with an assistant. LK got a steal of a deal, if that was what was actually agreed upon.
ETA: per horse.

18 Likes

Whitehouse, closer to the City (where I live), and I agree.

5 Likes

He solicited her and they made the arrangements in florida.

1 Like

I assume she would be asked to present 5 years of 1099’s, W-2’s, tax returns, whatever would prove she lost income. Certainly Barisone could produce his business records and total loss of income since August 2019 and potential future losses if he can’t build his business back up.

10 Likes

My complaint is that you were saying that **other **posters were writing some “nasty posts” (your words - not mine) about seahorse. I found the thread - Updated barisone lawsuit 10/29/21 post 851 post 2860. People THANKED her for offering her perspective, and asked a few polite questions which she answered. One poster did indeed look up her USDF record, and another poster corrected that initial poster by adding some correct info found via google. Not a single one of those posts were “Nasty.”

25 Likes

Thanks for sharing this. I like dealing with actual numbers.

$3500 x 4 = $14,000 (not inclusive of farrier, private lessons, living accommodations for people, etc)

Another question… in the summer of 2019 in Long Valley, NJ, if 3-4 stalls opened up at a facility like MBs, how long would it typically take to fill them?

4 Likes

How could u know my type when you have never even met me?

1 Like

Yeah, that part is pretty formulaic. You have to prove income at the moment of loss, and then they look back for a period of time based on industry, etc. Then if you’re claiming continued loss of future earnings for some period, based on medical records, they project out based on your past. So that number is usually never just random.

5 Likes

Apparently “nasty” is in the eye of the beholder unless they themselves are being nasty :slight_smile:
Heck, even posts offering a positive light are considered nasty to this group!!

9 Likes

They?

1 Like

Oh, of course. You actively look for negative. That’s on you.

4 Likes

She and michael

1 Like

Please just stop pushing your narrative that your daughter was a good business proposition. It is tired.

15 Likes

So dad, writer of the checks, wasn’t involved in negotiating any of it?

7 Likes

Still trying to be respectful here.

You questioned me, “Are you saying that [two lawyers perjured themselves and the judge and prosecutor stood by]?

I said nothing if the kind. Did not mention the word “perjury”. It was in the form of a clarifying question, but the nature of the question suggested I had accused someone of perjury.

As I understand it, to be perjury, an untrue statement given under oath must also be determined to be material to the issue at hand. I don’t know whether JK participated in the negotiations or not. I can’t really see how it’s material to whether MB shot LK or to MBs state of mind.

I appreciate your fully quoting the passage you were reacting to, so that I could clarify easily.

I imagine, as with much of that we’ve discussed, “solicited” is subjective.

5 Likes

I am as guilty as anyone of responding to certain someones. But what happens if we all stop? Let’s just all click on ignore and see what happens… maybe they will all move on? I am getting tired of seeing certain posters behave like bots and I am disappointed in myself for replying. Challenge to self and others!

11 Likes

I’m wondering if people reach out to Law and Crime expressing interest in seeing the civil trial, if it would encourage L&C to reach out to judge to record it?

10 Likes

Do you imagine you’re fooling anyone, even your legions of friends, when you claim that your purpose was to refute any suggest of illicit employment of the human trafficking kind?

Your protestation of innocence just doesn’t fly.

1 Like