You are tech savy, do you mind linking the order?
I can try. I think you have to download it from the court website and then upload it here like you would a picture.
Somewhere on my phone are millions of downloads I haven’t been able to do anything with. I admit I am a luddite.
3pony - I have a recollection that he is not allowed visitors, and though I think part of it, at least, was due to COVID risk, that may not be the only reason. LHO is able to talk to him regularly.
Thank you, I’m glad he is able to talk with her, hopefully times and length of calls aren’t too restrictive.
See the little paper clip. You can click on it, select the files and it has an option to save/print. The COTH upload button gives you the option to choose to upload a file to the forum.
How very interesting. And possibly telling.
Thank you!
Thanks for posting that!
I wonder how the prosecutor likes being reminded of his experience with the case. Lol.
SGF asked for them a while ago, but that was held back until after the criminal trial.
SGF all along has been saying they have no liability in this matter for a whole lot of reasons. They are pointing the finger at MB personally, and at LK for her actions (comparative negligence, duty to mitigate, etc). So, they’re looking for anything in all those recordings that would support one or both of those positions.
I think it’s safe to assume there’s no great conspiracy to commit murder on those 81 recordings. But what if there’s talk between, say, LK, RG, and others discussing ninja’ing it up or what have you? Just the mere fact that RG secretly recorded the ED conversation leads me to believe there might be some stuff that at a minimum supports SGF’s position.
Also, in the interest of fairness, LK had the recordings originally. She made them. MB had the recordings as part of discovery in the criminal case. It’s not equitable for SGF, the other party to the suit, to not have them.
Thank you!
You’re welcome. In the interest of completeness, if I were RC’s attorney, I’d request them next, if they haven’t already. I sometimes forget she’s a defendant in this, too.
I was wondering if her attorney would request them.
They should. I imagine that will come soon.
As a side note, all of the written and physical discovery is supposed to be done by the end of July. Then depositions can start. I hope MB has had progress on his commitment before then.
I would think RC’s liability would be covered since, even though her gun was illegally in the state, she testified as to her and MB having properly stored the gun and magazines separated, in the safe.
Interesting stuff since LK claims to have a recording of the conversation and has since deleted her claims about having recordings of MB’s discussions with his lawyers.
I would think RC’s liability would be covered since, even though her gun was illegally in the state, she testified as to her and MB having properly stored the gun and magazines separated, in the safe.
I agree, but she still needs to defend herself in the suit. Those recordings could either help her, or she needs to be able to rebut them if they appear damaging. And part of her defense is just like MB and SGF - the comparative negligence of LK.
Also, in the interest of fairness, LK had the recordings originally. She made them. MB had the recordings as part of discovery in the criminal case.
back in the older days I was involved in some court cases regarding recording (video specifically) …unless there is documentation to prove the validity of the recordings who is to say these were not altered?
We had to water mark each frame of video to show that continuity was not broken or altered