If he had served the 30 day notice on or before July 1, I think she would honored the 30 day notice and left prior to August 1.
If he only realized he was desperate to get her out of there by, say July 22, he had two legal, honest options:
- tell her, unilaterally, the training relationship and tenancy are ending as of Aug 22, 2019, or
- acknowledge that she had the right to remain for up to 30 days, and request and negotiate for her to leave earlier.
He went through door #3,
3) harass, intimidate and scare her into leaving prior to 30 days, and without a buyout of some form. The police calls and the massive complaint to USEF were part of the harassment campaign.
1 & 2 are alternatives to the intimidation campaign he chose. LK had been training with MB for some time, and while MB and MHG suddenly wanted her gone, if they had taken door 1 or door 2 instead of door three, it’s just not that onerous to honor the 30 day legally required notice.
I don’t think her FB posts, SS report, or harassment via the BI happened in a vacuum. I think she was responding to Barisone’s choice of door #3.
The closest I have come to this situation personally is that at one point I was sharing an apartment with a roommate I no longer got along with, and spent some money paying her last month’s rent to get her out of the apartment 3 weeks early. I “bought her out”. I was a student at the time and by no means flush, but it was money well spent.
I think that if Barisone had not opted for the intimidation campaign, it would have been uncomfortable but bearable to wait out the thirty days from whenever things turned sour (which was prior to Aug 5.) But I would have gone for door #2, and tried to “buy her out”. If her terms were something I couldn’t stomach, I would have made the best of the situation and waited out the thirty days without deliberately escalating things with an intimidation campaign.