Barisone assessment

@MorganSercu I love to hear the success stories. I’m so glad you had more time with your horse. :kissing_heart:
@eggbutt It’s a good thing we’re not seeing each other in person right now. I’m sure we would both be standing there blubbering. Holding you in my heart for your loss. :kissing_heart:

5 Likes

@eggbutt

I did apologize. My apology was made in reply to the poster who posted the quote I was remembering, and perhaps I didn’t tag you, as smoofox and a couple of others have been making comments as if tagging someone is rude. In this case, it would have alerted you to my apology.

I am able to admit a mistake, and have done so. I always admitted the possibility of faulty memory.

8 Likes

Thanks for your explanation of “hostile” witness! I had heard the term used but never knew exactly how that affected the questioning.

5 Likes

Thank you for admitting your mistake.

12 Likes

I doubled down because I was right. Unlike CH. So there’s that.

7 Likes

I appreciate your posting the “boob” post which makes it clear that my attribution to Eggbutt was incorrect.

What I remember is an all caps screaming match between LK and the other “big player poster” immediately before the thread was shut down. It’s still possible that there was a further exchange with all caps reiterating the discussing of boob fixing which was deleted by the mods when they shut the thread. It seems the worst of the posts which cause a thread to be closed are usually deleted by the mods. But even if that’s the case, you’ve convinced me the author of the quote or quotes was GreenWithEnvy, not Eggbutt.

1 Like

When presented with a plausible candidate of a quote that I was misremembering, I immediately conceded that I had misattributed the quote. And apologized to Eggbutt. I know my memory is far from perfect.

When presented with a plausible candidate of a quote you could have misremembered (the quote about Walthers), you continued to insist that there was a post about Rugers that you were 100% sure you saw, and must have been deleted. Big difference.

I don’t believe anyone who claims their memory is 100% perfect. I don’t doubt that there are others who have posted they believe they saw a Rugers post. If one person reports they’ve seen the Loch Ness monster, there tend to be other reported sightings. Doesn’t establish the existence of the Loch Ness monster.

1 Like

Are you sure you have me on ignore?

You claim to have avoided “engaging me” for some time, but nevertheless seem to post in order to disparage me on a daily basis. I would love for you to do as you’ve claimed and genuinely ignore me.

1 Like

I was never talking about the post with the Walthers. The Ruger post was a completely different post and I showed posts by 12 other people who cited ALSO SEEING THE RUGER POST.

My lord don’t you get that yet?

Geeze.

7 Likes

image

Ad nauseum

14 Likes

How would you expect her to get that? She apparently doesn’t even get that I can see what people are saying to her even though I have her on ignore. I can see she, once again, was handed her :peach: by multiple posters without ever having to see her original posts. Not all quoted material is hidden, either.

It’s particularly entertaining to see the epic fails while never having to see most of the tedious blather. :rofl:

But, these simple things seem beyond grasp. Ach, weel, what can you do?

10 Likes

I was following your request not to tag you, FitzE. But if the jabs are going to continue on a daily basis, what’s the point?

I would be happy to not engage you and not tag you, but not when your “ignoring” works like this.

If at some point you genuinely wish to decline to engage, I’m happy to reciprocate.

1 Like

Projecting much???

6 Likes

???

I never said I had FitzE on ignore. I don’t have her on ignore.

She has made several posts explaining how she has put me on ignore, and “declined to engage me” because I am beneath her notice. She has asked me not to tag her, which I have honored.

If I were actually on ignore and actually beneath her notice, that’d be great. But she seems to be following me plenty well and continuing with the petty disparagement.

If at any point she actually wants to disengage, I’m glad to reciprocate.

1 Like

To whomever posted way up thread about Judge T’s and Mr. B’s relationship. Judge T also worked under Mr. B in the prosecution’s office at one time—Mr B was Judge T’s boss.
I don’t know how long ago that was, but that is an interesting twist.

15 Likes

You do not seem to understand that even if FitzE has you on ignore, she can still see everyone else’s responses to your posts. By reading those responses, anyone can extrapolate what you are posting.

15 Likes

I’ve read that before. So I decided to do a deep dive into that.

It appears, from 1986-1988 Mr Bilinkis was listed as 1st Assistant Prosecutor. From 1986-1998, Judge Taylor is listed as Prosecutor. Of note, there were 100+ prosecutors in the office at that time.

Clearly though, they have a long, long history. They seem like they almost love to hate each other.

13 Likes

Yes, by mentioning her name in your response to me, she will have been alerted, and can click on the hidden post.

I’ve briefly had people on ignore, but given up for the reasons you mention. One can only genuinely disengage by, well, declining to engage the old fashioned, internal way.

2 Likes

I did not tag her in the post, so there is no way she was “alerted”.

You understand that putting this symbol “@“ before a screen name tags the person, correct? The result is their name is highlighted or bolded, identifying the tag.

This is not your first day on this board, but you appear to have no of how things work.

14 Likes

I don’t see how that quote is construed as “making light” of the seriousness of LK’s injuries. The poster isn’t denying LK was shot twice, doesn’t insinuate they were minor injuries, in fact doesn’t really talk about her injuries at all.

All she does is follow up on one of LK’s own comments about successful scores being related to image in dressage. LK is the one who made it publicly known her implant was damaged, so the question about whether she had it fixed to ensure she would present the right image when competing in Florida doesn’t seem off base. It’s certainly not in all caps, and certainly not belittling the actual gunshot injuries and subsequent surgeries…except perhaps in your own head.

You said these “belittling” posts had been occurring for years. Is that really the best example you can find, or is it the only example?

19 Likes