Barisone/Kanarek Legal Filings (Public Record)

[cutter99]

@Denali6298

Well and that’s exactly what I think. I don’t think someone is reining her in. I think she got so spun up and then she realized she slipped up. Then the house guest rolls in to distract us.

Winner, winner, chicken dinner!!!

[Sdel]

@eggbutt

I suspect she and perhaps her family were surprised at the volume of information available to the public via the civil case briefs. Notice that she has been relatively quiet in this thread other than saying basically that lawyers lie for their clients and only go by what they are told in the briefs (same would be said about her lawyers too I suppose). And, of course, the truth will come out and you’ll all be sorry and I’m taking names and keeping files on particular posters. Got it.

I’d sure like to be a fly on the wall for those interrogatories though. Those are going to be interesting reading for the attorneys involved.

[FitzE]

@Sdel

I’d sure like to be a fly on the wall for those interrogatories though. Those are going to be interesting reading for the attorneys involved.

Yes, a shift in that data room would be a real doozy, I’m sure.

[Denali6298]

@FitzE

Ah ha! So that poster, USEF, SS and LK are the four monitors. You solved it!

I’m quite the keyboard detective! No kidding though, I bet that poster was Shelley whoever. The older lady who defends her. I think RG also reads here.

[eggbutt]

@FitzE

Ah ha! So that poster, USEF, SS and LK are the four monitors. You solved it!

Considering COTH would require subpoenas from USEF and/or SS to obtain identity, I would think this is bogus. Their monitoring Facebook, however, is a horse of a different color. That is assuming they have the time, interest and inclination to do that type of monitoring.

Her “monitors” if there are any, are her minions who are lurking to alert her to anything said they believe is super derogatory against her. And, that’s a stretch. Remember, Lk is the mistress of veiled threats.

[FitzE]

@Denali6298

I’m quite the keyboard detective! No kidding though, I bet that poster was Shelley whoever. The older lady who defends her. I think RG also reads here.

So, that makes you one of the “Detectives” now, right?

[YankeeDuchess]

@Sparky

I almost completely agree, with the tiny modification of adding shooting “at” people. The only one we know of with that history is LK.

I hope you are not being sarcastic. I edited it to reflect your suggestion.

[cutter99]

@eggbutt

Considering COTH would require subpoenas from USEF and/or SS to obtain identity, I would think this is bogus. Their monitoring Facebook, however, is a horse of a different color. That is assuming they have the time, interest and inclination to do that type of monitoring.

Her “monitors” if there are any, are her minions who are lurking to alert her to anything said they believe is super derogatory against her. And, that’s a stretch. Remember, Lk is the mistress of veiled threats.

And don’t you think if COTH was handing over identities of posters, they would be obligated to let those posters know in some way? E-mail, letter in writing, etc.

[Denali6298]

@FitzE

So, that makes you one of the “Detectives” now, right?

Well I guess it would! Please remember it’s “detective” not detective.

[FitzE]

Don’t forget the capped D

[eggbutt]

A refresher from post #5 on page 1:

" At the time she made that threat, Kanarek was known to be familiar with firearms, to have claimed and/or actual access to a firearm, and to have used a firearm in the past for purposes of shot at her boyfriend and/or his motorcycle while she was in a fit of rage."

[Denali6298]

@FitzE

Don’t forget the capped D

Ooooh I get the capped D too!!!

Denali does a cartwheel in her hotel room

[Sparky]

@eggbutt

A refresher from post #5 on page 1:

" At the time she made that threat, Kanarek was known to be familiar with firearms, to have claimed and/or actual access to a firearm, and to have used a firearm in the past for purposes of shot at her boyfriend and/or his motorcycle while she was in a fit of rage."

QFP. And thank you. I wasn’t planning on searching for that!

[eggbutt]

@eggbutt

More from another file:

“2. Upon information and belief, Kanarek is not a resident of Morris County, New Jersey but, rather, lives a transient lifestyle in which she resides in many locations including, but not limited to , from time to time, Morris County, New Jersey. 3. Kanarek has a criminal history which, upon information and belief, includes a charge and/or conviction for criminal assault. 4. Kanarek has a history of illegal drug use including, upon information and belief, heroin. 5. Kanarek has a history of tortious and/or criminal, antisocial behavior, including but not limited to stalking; bullying; threats of harm, injury, and mayhem against persons she chooses to target; threats against public figures; gaslighting; fraud; false reports; and other behaviors which are harmful, injurious, and destructive to the people she victimizes. 6. Upon information and belief, there is a dozen or more families, persons and businesses in the United States who were victimized by Kanarek through abuse, stalking, crime, and/or other forms of serious abuse, prior to August 2019 when Kanarek turned her sights upon Barisone. 7. At all times relevant hereto, Kanarek was and remains a significant user of various forms of social media including Facebook through which, upon information and belief, Kanarek has more than 10,000 Facebook “Friends,” messenger communication contacts, chats, and like online activities (collective, whether on Facebook and/or other platforms, “Facebook”). 8. For purposes of causing personal injury to Barisone, his business, injury to his good name and reputation, and/or injury to the like interests of Barisone’s girlfriend and other people close to Barisone (collectively, the “Barisone Family”), Kanarek perpetrated a campaign against Barisone and the Barisone Family, which included, without limitation, Kanarek’s utilization of Facebook to publish, promote, and disseminate statements, accusations, and falsehoods that were explicitly threatening; explicitly and/or implicitly threatening injury and violence; causing the subject to be stalked; causing the subject to be bullied; harmful; deceptive; deceitful; false; causing the subject serious and severe emotional pain and distress; harming the subject’s good name and/or reputation; causing the subject to be “destroyed”; harming the subject’s family and friends; and/or that otherwise were grossly inappropriate, harmful, and/or injurious. 9. At all times relevant hereto, Kanarek’s purpose was to cause injury, pain, distress, and upset of a severe and significant nature. 10. At all times relevant hereto, Kanarek’s acts, actions and omissions were perpetrated maliciously, intentionally, recklessly and/or negligently. 11. At all times relevant hereto, Kanarek’s wrongful acts, actions, and omissions included, for example, making false accusation of child abuse, false accusations of animal abuse, false accusation of insurance fraud, false reports to agencies providing child-protective-services, and other falsehoods through which her intention was to cause harm. 12. For example, Kanarek harassed Barisone by utilizing technology to “bug” (i.e., unlawfully eves drop) upon private conversation Barisone was having; and/or, alternatively, harassed Barisone for purposes of causing him severe and significant emotional distress by claiming that she had unlawful eves-dropping of Barisone’s residence and/or business for purposes of stalking him and Barisone Family members. 13. As another example, Kanarek threatened physical violence and harm by and through her internet posting that her “weapons [were] hot” (a phrase indicating that she had a firearm, loaded with ammunition, and its chamber hot) and she was coming for Barisone and/or Barisone Family members. 14. At the time she made that threat, Kanarek was known to be familiar with firearms, to have claimed and/or actual access to a firearm, and to have used a firearm in the past for purposes of shot at her boyfriend and/or his motorcycle while she was in a fit of rage. 15. At all times relevant hereto, Kanarek had a duty to Barisone and the Barisone Family members to refrain from stalking, harming, harassing, threatening, threatening-with-violence, demeaning, injuring, and/or damaging the persons Kanarek was victimizing (including, most notably, Barisone). 16. At all times relevant hereto, Kanarek materially breach her duty(ies) to Barisone and the Barisone Family members, through the acts, actions, and omissions referenced above. 17. As a direct and proximate result and consequence of Kanarek’s wrongful acts, actions, and omissions, Kanarek cause injury to Barisone including but not limited to: (a) placing him in fear for his life and physical wellbeing; (b) placing him in fear for the lives and physical wellbeing of Barisone Family members; © placing him in fear for the lives and physical wellbeing of Barisone’s business staff, clients and the horses owned and/or boarded by Barisone at his dressage farm; (d) emotional distress, including emotional distress with physical manifestations; (f) traumatic stress; (f) emotional breakdown; (g) post-traumatic stress; (h) battered-person-syndrome; (i) psychiatric ailments and eventual breakdown; (j) destruction of his state of mental peace, tranquility, enjoyment and stability; (k) injury to his business; (l) injury mental state; (m) unlawful invasion of his privacy; (n) property damage; (o) irreparable harm; § financial harm; (q) physical harm; and ® other injuries.”

Above from LCV2020428787

Here is the entire post so there is no question whether it was manipulated and it is still accessible on the NJ.courts.com site.

[cutter99]

@Denali6298

Ooooh I get the capped D too!!!

Denali does a cartwheel in her hotel room

Be careful! This is not a time to get injured!

[eggbutt]

@Denali6298

Ooooh I get the capped D too!!!

Denali does a cartwheel in her hotel room

Are you on vacation or business??? Stay safe!

[MorganSercu]

@FitzE

Maybe sound was for where people would be out of ear shot, though. So in the barn, tack room, etc. But where she lived they wouldn’t need recording devices b/c they would be there.

Somewhere she was saying that the assistant trainer was recorded robbing them of something from their bedroom. She had it on film that he entered their bedroom and Rob said something was missing. But no police report was filed that I know about. Anyone else?

[Denali6298]

@cutter99

Be careful! This is not a time to get injured!

You’re no fun.

[eggbutt]

@MorganSercu

Somewhere she was saying that the assistant trainer was recorded robbing them of something from their bedroom. She had it on film that he entered their bedroom and Rob said something was missing. But no police report was filed that I know about. Anyone else?

Yeah, there was conversation about that and nothing came from anyone being able to find any police report. Some speculated RG may have taken her jewelry to sustain himself while she was in the hospital. I may have been one of those speculating that theory, As I recall she said “immediately” after the shooting or “the day after the shooting” but the problem with that is there was police tape up and the investigation went on for several days after the shooting. RG and JK were the ones there the next day and could have accessed the house (not saying they did, but they were both there).

[catzndogz22]

@eggbutt

People close to MB have said he does not want a plea and wants this to go to trial to prove his case. I hope his gut instinct is correct. At least he has an extremely capable criminal defense attorney to guide him and maneuver this situation. Based on the civil documents, it seems he may go for a diminished capacity defense but I have no idea how the two cases and pleas are related. Remember, HE was in fear of LK and RG at the time.

To our lawyer posters, does it make a difference if there is one plea in a civil trial and a completely different one in a criminal trial?

This is from Trans ID: LCV2020530535, starting on page 7. Bold is mine. It doesn’t look like MB is disputing that he shot LK, but is arguing battered person and defense of himself and others on the farm.

SEPARATE DEFENSES
FIRST SEPARATE DEFENSE
The Complaint fails to state claims and/or causes of action upon which relief could be granted.
SECOND SEPARATE DEFENSE
Defendant was not competent at the time of the alleged incident and, as a result, should have no liability to Plaintiff for her injuries, by reason of Barisone’s mental state and/or condition which included but was not limited to battered-person-syndrome cause by Plaintiff’s campaign of emotional battery against Defendant and/or persons in his care.
THIRD SEPARATE DEFENSE
Alternatively, Plaintiff’s claims and/or prayers for relief are barred by application of principles of self-defense and defense of others, including adults, teenagers, children and/or horses using the farm.
FOURTH SEPARATE DEFENSE
Injuries and damages sustained by the Plaintiff are the result, in whole and/or material part, of the Plaintiff’s own acts and omissions, including but not limited Plaintiff’s acts and omission which constituted the root cause of an alleged injury, and/or Plaintiff’s negligent, reckless, and/or intentional failure to avoid injuries she sustained.
FIFTH SEPARATE DEFENSE
Plaintiff’s claims are barred by her own intervening intentional, reckless, malicious, and/or negligent acts, actions and/or omissions.
SIXTH SEPARATE DEFENSE
Plaintiff’s claims and damages are barred, and/or must be reduced, by application of principles of comparative negligence and/or comparative fault, including but not limited to the law as expressed under the New Jersey Comparative Negligence Act.
SEVENTH SEPARATE DEFENSE
In the event that it is determined that this Defendant has liability to Plaintiff for her injuries and/or damages (which liability is denied), this Defendant is entitled to a credit, set off, and/or other reduction with respect to any and all collateral source payments Plaintiff received as a result of the incident(s), in accordance with N.J.S.A. § 2A:15-97.