Barisone KROL this Friday, 5/26

[SoCoPony]

@hut-ho78

It doesn’t fit the allowed narrative.

[Sdel]

@hut-ho78

Because 48 Hours stated he told MHG and the CPS employee to leave the office, opened the safe, retrieved the Ruger, drove to the farmhouse and while “events there are not clear” LK ended up shot twice.

This was the narrative the state tried to push.

However, no one could testify to seeing him open the safe or in possession of the gun. The only one who did say anything about it was a hearsay witness, in which case it has to be considered that the statement may or may not be true. Considering that it is also testified by that that he couldn’t remember covering that time frame, it seems it was not true, and the witness misspoke trying to get the point across that Barisone was in extreme fear.

It is completely possible that he opened the safe and there was no Ruger to be found because Lauren removed it when she was ninjaing around in the middle of night after getting them all kicked out of the barn. Knowing the Ruger was missing would certain explain the behavior and rush to the house that followed.

[Sdel]

@hut-ho78

MHG had to read texts with MB that “why don’t we just tell her to leave because no one has?” (Which led to his reply about scaring her out/she would be begging to leave/he had done it before and was very good at it.)

This is a mischaracterization of the trial testimony for any reader who may not already be aware.

[eggbutt]

@hut-ho78

Because 48 Hours stated he told MHG and the CPS employee to leave the office, opened the safe, retrieved the Ruger, drove to the farmhouse and while “events there are not clear” LK ended up shot twice.

??? Nikki made this comment in both the original and rerun. That wasn’t edited. Your post is quite confusing. Any edits made in the rerun make no difference to “the narrative”, whatever that is. The significant edit was the removal of Nagel’s smug announce Barisone was being sued and the jury was insane. All references to that super professional have been removed.

[eggbutt]

PSHAW! You know the only narrative and truth comes from The Kanareks! There are multiple versions of their narrative to chose from! /s

[trubandloki]

@hut-ho78

Because 48 Hours stated he told MHG and the CPS employee to leave the office, opened the safe, retrieved the Ruger, drove to the farmhouse and while “events there are not clear” LK ended up shot twice.

It doesn’t fit the allowed narrative.

MHG had to read texts with MB that “why don’t we just tell her to leave because no one has?” (Which led to his reply about scaring her out/she would be begging to leave/he had done it before and was very good at it.)

Tarshis testified he argued with MB urging him to evict her and it became so heated he nearly walked away because he couldn’t stand watching this unfold.

Yet MB looked at Nikki and answered her question about if he told LK to leave and he said “many times.”

I’ve always been bothered by that. MHG came across as very honest and so did Tarshis. That “many times” just completely contradicted their testimony. I don’t believe they perjured themselves so what happened here?

Hut, you are having the problem where you are saying something that is provable to be an X is an 8.

Your misquoting what MHG said. Here is the exact language from the trial about the text.

Mr Schellhorn (text from Aug 3rd): “and did you ask him why can we not say to Lauren and Rob and the father because still no one actually has we are evicting you you must leave no one has
said it”

MHG: That’s Correct

Mr S: and is his response to you online 9365 Monday morning?

MHG: Yes, that’s correct.

Key Words “we are evicting you.” Not: get out of my house like your dad told my lawyer you’d do, that same day (per Tarshis’s testimony.)

Key Note: Monday Morning, August 5th, she got the eviction notice.

And here is a copy of that thing that Jonathan Kanarek posted here admitting they were asked to leave.

So you, @hut-ho78 can be unbothered now because they were not being untruthful. You are just not willing to hear the real words.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

I don’t think anyone has said George Clooney is set to play Barisone. Who do you think should play him? See how that works? A movie is mentioned somewhere and someone starts a discussion of who will play whom…unless it is in your environment. I can’t imagine a move deal has been struck, a screen play written, actors approached, etc and that’s why I speculate if Barisone said Clooney would play him, it might be tongue in cheek.

Why don’t you contact LO via the GFM contact and ask her???

I agree. It’s extremely unlikely that a movie deal has been struck, script written, and actors contracted. That’s why it’s evidence of delusions and grandiose thinking if Barisone told his psychiatrists that George Clooney had been cast to play him.

You probably have already gotten the inside scoop from LO and know whether George Clooney’s name was mentioned in the Krol hearing.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

(post withdrawn by author, will be automatically deleted in 24 hours unless flagged)

Darn, I was feeling special, you had quoted me twice.

[Unfforgettable]

OK, so if my memory is correct, we now have:

A completed trial, with no bombshells from the K crew.

A civil case with promised bombshells that was dropped via the K crew when exposure of LK and RG’s criminal charges/behavior and drug use would be brought to light…with prejudice so it is done for good.

2 episodes of 48 hours, mostly similar, with no bombshells dropped by LK or JK and in fact, refusal to discuss the case at all (which may have been on advice of their attorney as the civil case had not yet been dismissed with prejudice).

LK all over the internet in places she hasn’t yet been banned, trying to spin her story and often in direct conflict with her previous statements…and yet there are still no bombshells.

Methinks there are no weapons of mass destruction to be found.
Just lots of hot air with no substance in any sort of truth.

[Sdel]

@trubandloki

be unbothered now because they were not being untruthful. You are just not willing to hear the real words.

Well, that is a nice way to say it….

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

That’s why it’s evidence of delusions and grandiose thinking if Barisone told his psychiatrists that George Clooney had been cast to play him.

But… no one has said that Michael has said that to the people ‘treating’ him at Greystone so it is not proof of anything.

The fact that someone joked about who would play who (that has happened here many times if you remember) does not make it such that Michael said that.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

At this time I have seen the edited version. The edits are most certainly not significant, unless you consider not being able to see Bruce calling the jury insane as something significant.

I’ll need to watch it myself to see if the edits are significant or trivial.

I just don’t think CBS would go to the effort to edit it to make trivial, insignificant changes.

[SoCoPony]

Again the first time I ever heard/read this was from one of the unhinged ranting post from LK herself.

Maybe she was in a fit of a delusion and well grandiose thinking herself when she came up with that post.

.

[smoofox]

Bold is me.

@CurrentlyHorseless

I still have not seen the edited rebroadcast.

And yet you know all about it!

I suspected it was “significantly edited” based on what you and others posted here, Eggbutt.

It had some tweaks and edits but nothing “significant”. I know my local station jammed in an extra commercial a couple of times… and came back to 48 Hours after that.

Someone posts that it was just a rerun, no update. Fine. I believed that.

But then the “it’s just a rerun, it’s not worth watching” starts to trend.

Hmm. Why the emphasis on the reports that it’s a rerun? Hmm. Maybe they don’t want it to be viewed? Because it has been significantly edited?

Hmmm. You know, everything is not a conspiracy. And no - as I said above - not SIGNIFICANTLY edited.

Starts to “trend”? Has this small forum suddenly morphed into Twitter or Truth Social or something?

It was the strange emphasis on the assertion it had not been edited that made me suspicious.

It seems there are different versions based the feed or streaming or commercials or whatever - so your suspicions - especially since you have not even deigned to watch it again - are without merit.

I read what you write, Eggbutt. I don’t necessarily take it at face value. I think, OK, what is she saying here? What is she not saying? What is she unintentionally revealing?

If only you applied those kinds of questions and that scrutiny to what LK has been throwing up all over Facebook…

Sort of like my interpretation of your coming on to say that if MB said George Clooney was set to play him in the movie, knowing MB, “it was probably tongue in cheek.”

Well, such a comment would be seen as tongue in cheek to me as well - as I am not obsessed with the LK paranoia and assertions that MB is completely nuts and evil and whatever her latest rant is…

@hut-ho78

Because 48 Hours stated he told MHG and the CPS employee to leave the office, opened the safe, retrieved the Ruger, drove to the farmhouse and while “events there are not clear” LK ended up shot twice.

It doesn’t fit the allowed narrative.

The allowed narrative?? Good heavens. Once again, everything is NOT a conspiracy. “Events there are not clear”. So 48 Hours said what many of us have been saying.

MHG had to read texts with MB that “why don’t we just tell her to leave because no one has?” (Which led to his reply about scaring her out/she would be begging to leave/he had done it before and was very good at it.)

Speaking from experience after going through a similar situation - that feeling of desperation is tangible. We once had to force a malignant boarder out before our version of LK descended upon us - but the tactics we use to move that boarder along did not work with the extreme entitled narcissist that was our LK - she also used threats, sneers, told lies about the farm all over Facebook and other SM … reported that we were abusing horses on the big breed FB page etc. Sound familiar? You have not lived through that type of situation. You have ZERO idea… of the anxiety and stress… that one person can cause - and she revelled in it. That should also sound familiar.

Tarshis testified he argued with MB urging him to evict her and it became so heated he nearly walked away because he couldn’t stand watching this unfold.

Yet MB looked at Nikki and answered her question about if he told LK to leave and he said “many times.”

I’ve always been bothered by that. MHG came across as very honest and so did Tarshis. That “many times” just completely contradicted their testimony. I don’t believe they perjured themselves so what happened here?

Maybe they were talking about the formal eviction process as opposed to just telling her many times to leave? Maybe you are trying to find some molecule of contradiction or potential perjury -GASP- and make it into something bigger? LK made it very clear back around July 2019 - all over FB - that she had been asked to leave several times and was being pushed out and so on and so forth… but that it was war and she had bombshells and she would take down the king and the castle and whatever other bilge she was spewing at the time.

[trubandloki]

@Unfforgettable

2 episodes of 48 hours, mostly similar, with no bombshells dropped by LK or JK and in fact, refusal to discuss the case at all (which may have been on advice of their attorney as the civil case had not yet been dismissed with prejudice).

And Lauren Kanarek has been promising bombshells in the 48 hours episode for ages.

Note the last paragraph, from December of '21.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

At this time I have seen the edited version. The edits are most certainly not significant, unless you consider not being able to see Bruce calling the jury insane as something significant.

I’ll need to watch it myself to see if the edits are significant or trivial.

I just don’t think CBS would go to the effort to edit it to make trivial, insignificant changes.

So this is you admitting that you are calling something you have not seen yet a significant edit?

Strange way to do things, no?

Things sounds like that whole police report thing.

[SoCoPony]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’ll need to watch it myself to see if the edits are significant or trivial.

Yes, CH I do remember suggesting that to you yesterday…

Does this jog your memory at all?

Because honestly you are all acting like this

[CanteringCarrot]

Whether or not the edits are “trivial” may be a matter of opinion. There’s no quest to be right or wrong there.

Now that we’ve circled back to the whole Clooney thing, I’ll ask again: does anyone know if MB said “Clooney is cast to play me in a movie” or if he said something like “it’d be cool if…” “Clooney would play me…” what was the exact wording. If you don’t know the exact wording, then drop the bone. If you do, please let me know.

[Djones]

Shrug. I called it a rerun because they chopped the same stuff up different ways. There were no new revelations or updates. I watched it. I commented on it on FB a couple of times. I’m actively interested in other’s knowing the facts and the truth. I’m not so egomaniacal or narcissistic as to presume that my use of the word “rerun” would discourage anyone from watching.

All of us, CH included, can see that Lauren herself is not happy with the end result, rerun or not. She’s not being held up as some poor girl who was bullied and trapped at the farm. The mirror that allllll the others who watched the rerun/not rerun are showing her is not flattering to her in the least, and she’s mad as a wet hen about it.

[Sdel]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

At this time I have seen the edited version. The edits are most certainly not significant, unless you consider not being able to see Bruce calling the jury insane as something significant.

I’ll need to watch it myself to see if the edits are significant or trivial.

I just don’t think CBS would go to the effort to edit it to make trivial, insignificant changes.

So this is you admitting that you are calling something you have not seen yet a significant edit?

Strange way to do things, no?

Things sounds like that whole police report thing.

Wait wait, last time CH was on her high horse about not needing to watch it….just reading the transcript was enough. Watching it would simply alter the truth and insert biases that just reading the transcript wouldn’t do.