Oooh, thanks @Rhythm_Pace_Impulsion ! Good catch.
For those of you who see MB as a wounded bird and LK as the big bad, if he gets out, I hope you are right.
He tried to kill LK and RG. He put two rounds in LK’s chest. He started a jail house nuisance lawsuit against the court and LE his lawyers had to clean up, his girlfriend left him. Oh, and the girlfriend was the one he left his wife for, gave up $965,000, and 3 good horses if considerable value. The only remorse he might have shown is one “I’m sorry.”
If instead of a wounded bird, he is a wounded angry feigning insanity, then release by a simple NG could be an incredibly dangerous situation for all involved.
NGI would require evaluation and treatment for an undetermined amount of time and maybe a full restoration depending on what SS does.
Guilty would keep him from hurting anyone else except inmates and guards on the prison.
I’ve said before that NGI may be the best solution for a really tragic situation.
I cannot fathom how anyone can equate SM trash talking (and there are several here that are enthusiasts) to shooting someone twice in the chest and shooting at someone else.
Victims always have their pasts rolled out in court. Children are accused of making things up. It sucks to be a victim of violent crime. Victims have no rights in court.
6 Likes
I feel like this case is getting a little lost in the Depp/Heard shuffle on the networks. It’s difficult to find info.
1 Like
Thanks!
1 Like
MB is in the room. Is this routine for just questions to the judge? I have no idea how these things work. Like does he have to keep marching in every time Taylor adresses the jury?
4 Likes
You make many assumptions, often.
To hold a useful discussion it helps to accept what people say/write as what they intend, rather than bending it into what you think, assume, or interpret them to be saying or writing.
20 Likes
I don’t see how a jury of 12 people could come to a verdict this quickly. People on this thread have been following this fiasco for over 2 years, replaying videos, etc. and we still have questions and disagreements based on what was said, heard, or written.
1 Like
Reasonable doubt means they do not need answers to all the things we ask.
12 Likes
Judge on the bench
2 Likes
If all parties are in agreement as to the outcome at the outset - the initial poll shows all in agreement - there’s not deliberation to be done.
5 Likes
Link???
Jury has questions about when the psychologists saw MB. Exact date.
11 Likes
YouTube search
“Barisone Verdict day 12”
you only have to scroll up about 6 posts
Frankly, it might be easier without the years of extraneous information, etc. A lot less mud in the water.
3 Likes
1 Like
Thank you
1 Like
They haven’t. The jury have asked a clarifying question - what exact dates did the psychologists/and or psychiatrists meet with Barisone.
The courtroom is comparing the testimonies and drafting a response based on the testimonies.
7 Likes
If he’s found not guilty on all charges, I think the ban would be lifted unless SS chose to conduct their own investigation.
2 Likes
With my jury all the relevant parties had to be in the courtroom when our questions were answered or testimony read back. Even for very minor stuff that took a few minutes.
5 Likes
