I got the impression that you didn’t have to plead them together (or even at all), but if you wanted to plead both of them you had to do it together. The previous process was to plead one, and if you got a guilty verdict to then go back and retry the other to see if you got a different outcome.
There was definitely a day early on in the first week when the judge admonished the defense attorney for something with no prompting, and then turned around and let the prosecutor do the exact same thing just a minute or two later.
The defense attorney objected, and the judge sustained that objection, so obviously the prosecutor was in the wrong. But the judge did nothing about it until the defense attorney brought it up.
To me, that seemed to set the tone for the whole trial.
I was responding to an earlier post, not commenting on the charges. For some reason, the quote function is not working for me today, but if you look at the post I replied to, my comment will make sense.
A poster said:
Taylor wants this trial to be based on Barisone’s state of mind. That’s what all the testimony has been about.
And I replied:
MB’s lawyer made this about state of mind with the “not guilty by reason of insanity”. The judge is making sure the testimony stays in this lane.
Schellhorn WAS playing games… lecturing everyone on what he thought happened (when he was not there), preening, posturing and even bullying.
And yet all that nonsense was peachy-keen with Taylor. The judge never asked The Moustache That Roared to move along in his droning self adoration… he never objected to hearsay or snide comments… he basically gave the guy free rein to do whatever he wanted and say whatever he pleased - carte blanche!
And yes, he should have been shut down, asked to clarify, had comments stricken from the record etc. That was most definitely a “game”… played with the full approval of Taylor.
I did the exact same thing as a junior, at the old Bakersfield GP. show. Having the round of my life, seeing everything then boom. Placed in my second round and even picked up my ribbon (they handed them out then).
We know very little about memory; it’s outer space.
Mr B didn’t object, didn’t ask the judge to direct the witness to just answer the question or anything though. And the judge did tell him at least twice to just answer the questions.
I think that was strategy on Mr B’s part. He knew the jury wasn’t listening. He probably could see it all over their faces and body language that they had checked out. So why not let him drone on more? Jury’s not paying attention, so maybe they will miss any nugget of importance The Moustache slips in there.