The psych witnesses offer subjective analysis on an imperfect science and they disagree.
For the weapons charge, I think that one will be guilty. The attempted murder? I don’t know what the 12 jurors will do, I don’t know how I would vote.
The homeowner is the principal, and may pay a licensed contractor as his agent to pull the permits. But the contractor would only be obtaining the permits on the principal’s authority.
The decision to obtain permits, or not, is the responsibility of the principal (the homeowner).
eggbutt you have already admitted to being biased against LK for personal reasons, and you clearly have a huge amount of rage against her for someone who I believe lied for more than two years after this happened that you had no relationship with anyone in this case. Ever since LK outed you, you have become even more rabid against her. What is your end game here? Your rage regarding this case really seems unhealthy. Is LK a real threat to you or your family at this point, because if so, I can see why you are reacting the way you are and I hope you can resolve the problems to eliminate the threat and move on with your life.
When the victim fights back, blame the victim. Yeah it’s the victim who is being irrational. It’s the victim who is being mean. This is the same type of gaslighting that LK did to MB.
I haven’t seen anyone as you describe. This situation was avoidable by either party. Neither would disengage and they both lost. All MB had to do to disengage was be professional and evict them formally.
[Edit] I have previously posted here multiple times acknowledging that LK is a liar; you really need to do a little fact checking before you make accusations here. And you also need to pay attention to the trial more; the judge did in fact tell Bilinkas that he was not allowed to make up stories with no evidence to back them up.
It’s the job of the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that MB shot them. It’s the job of the defense to negate the prosecutions case if they want a straight “not guilty”. The defense does not need to “prove a negative” to negate the prosecution’s case, and offering a plausible alternative theory such as the gun going off in a struggle, would be one such alternative. But the defense did not establish that as an alternative theory, and doing so is complicated by the fact that it’s clear that he armed himself and went to their location.
After all the mockery you’ve spewed my way? Nah, pass on giving you an assist here. You’ve been plenty nasty all on your own. No one has called you stupid or a cockroach. You’ve got to own that stuff all by your lonesome. No one makes you call them a cockroach - that’s all you.
I never said there wasn’t any doubt. I’m just pointing out that there’s not “no evidence” as is repeatedly being asserted. Testimony, witness statements, and ear witness are evidence.
It’s a full blown legal beagle dogfight on this thread.
Sheesh.
If @rowdy can settle down (see what I did there ) and have a productive and cordial exchange with me, the rest of y’all have got to find a way to rein it in a little .