I’m trying to put myself in the position of the jury. I’m trying to be objective and consider the facts and the evidence as presented. There’s no reason for snark. You view the evidence one way and I view it another. That’s all. Why so angry? This has nothing to do with either of us.
1 Like
Which she would never do and in fact did not do.
3 Likes
Witness reports, police reports, 911 calls, etc, are considered evidence in court. Many cases come down to that kind of evidence - old abuse cases, rape cases where there’s no kit done, etc.
Maybe I’m getting hung up on semantics here - but if the only “evidence” of things was ironclad forensics/video, a lot of criminals would walk free.
5 Likes
On the off chance you aren’t being deliberately obtuse and you genuinely don’t understand what projection is, perhaps this will help:
11 Likes
Obtuse is such a useful word sometimes.
7 Likes
So? What should be the consequence of her refusal to agree to whatever deal was being worked out?
1 Like
They probably also deal with people who are a bit less dense and mean spirited than some of those here.
Just saying.
3 Likes
If he was in the mindset to kill himself and had no reason to expect them to be there, he was then in a pickle to find them there. This woman who had planted recording devices, made horrid accusations of sexual molestation against him, and had known since April that he did not want her there, this woman who crept around in the dark around the property and campaigned via social media and crowed about her intent to destroy him…and there she is. There she is.
8 Likes
They also likely understand the difference between predicting and projecting
11 Likes
I slowly went through Taylor’s instructions tonight, after seeing a few more comments about how MB has already admitted to shooting LK/RG (Taylor says differently - first generally not guilty, then add in insanity if found guilty).
From the flow chart Taylor gave the jury, if they are asking to review Dr. Simring, I would lean towards they found the State DID in fact prove their case, and they are now considering the insanity claim. Still not putting money on anything, but it would fit with the flow chart.
9 Likes
Oh I’m sorry. Did I threaten to sue you and attach a lien to your property?
Or did I just prove you wrong? Again.
11 Likes
They would probably also recognize that I didn’t predict OR project anything in the referenced post.
3 Likes
(Also, guys… can we all just go have a chocolate and go to bed?? Maybe fresher minds will be less projective or obtuse tomorrow…)
10 Likes
I tend to agree. What do you think will happen with the second attempted murder charge?
1 Like
By asking to rehear Simring, has the jury decided the state has proven its case on SOME charge (attempted murder, aggravated assault and/or weapons? That’s how I interpret the jury’s request.
4 Likes
Again, JESUS. Where in my post that was quoted did I project anything?
3 Likes
Consequence?
Let’s talk about consequences. Like what should be the consequence when you don’t want to place your average rider with a poor work ethic as your primary ballerina?
5 Likes
Agreed.
I wonder if they feel the State proved their case on one, or both charges. I do have a sincerely hard time with the charges involving RG. He wasn’t shot. All they have is a bullet hole in the house, and testimony.
6 Likes
Now you just need to go to bed. You’re not making any sense. Or your deflecting.
3 Likes
Personally, I don’t know if they showed enough evidence that MB did in fact raise the gun and separately shoot at MG. But, if the jury decided the shooting happened as reported by LK/MG, then I can see them taking both as Guilty and then moving on to decide on the insanity.
I’m not a betting person. I really have no idea what the jury will do. My gut says lessor charges, maybe insanity.
6 Likes
