Anyone free of emotion is usually diagnosed with sociopathy or personality disorders. Why would anyone want that?
By IdahoRider [quote] As for why he wants to stay in custody? He is in a county jail currently. His lawyer is betting that he will be found guilty of a lesser included charge and released for time served. If I had to do time, I would probably choose county jail to prison every time.
Sheilah
Well, MB wrote an entire letter from jail, complaining precisely about JAIL. He stated that prison would be “so much better,” bc, in prison, “inmates get iPads, cell phones and sausage not made of soy.” He stated “the truth will soon come out.” (Among other things with undermine his claim he remembers nothing.) He also said there is nothing worse than JAIL. “No one can touch you, hug you. In prison, you get visitors, you can see them in person- and not through a partition.” So…… it’s odd, yes, given his great disdain for jail that he’d just LOVE to stay! I believe Bilinkas is praying for a reduced sentenced- so mb can be released with “time served,” after a short stint in prison, if anything.
Thanks to Eggbutts lovely contributions, we know now what MBs defense is going to be. Why she & her cohorts keep referencing “vicious dogs.” Why she continues to state “a Man with grey hair, was walking down the driveway, on the phone, but turned away when the cops arrived. Why she stated “don’t forget, Dick so & so was THERE the next day.” My guess? All these “out of state witnesses,” to which Bilinkas keeps referring is a big red herring. The real surprise (he hopes) will be that he presents a real “eye witness.” An eye witness who called the cops bc of “dogs barking,” NOT the gun shots. This would back up PREMEDITATION. Mb PLANNED to say he brought a gun bc of “vicious dogs.” But…… why did he come at all? Also, one of our dogs DOES NOT bark. Surprise! Even if they both barked, it can’t be heard from our bedroom.
Well…. now (thanks to Eggbutt) we can the DA exactly the defense’s strategy. You don’t get it. I may come in here and say things which make me sound crazy. This thread would do that to any GSW victim, being re-victimized. But, we also know, EGGBUTT loves to talk. She dreams she has more info than she does so she easily gives away the info she DOES have. Surprise. Again! Thanks for allowing my interrogation Eggbutt. You gave us all we needed to know and even provided more weight to our own claims of conspiracy to commit murder, but especially PREMEDITATED MURDER. You and your friend “Dick,” (guessing, “Richard,” right?) likely will not receive a “thank you,” note from MB. It’s been real. You can always count on a big mouth to say too much. Xoxo!
By Eggbutt “Which is why a top forensic psychiatrist has been hired by the defense to examine (5 times already) Barisone to dispute the state’s psychiatric report.”
Answer- NO. The entire reason for hiring a “top forensic psychiatrist,” is to keep MB off the stand, without having to invoke 5th A right to not “self incriminate.” If a psych tells a story the defendant told him, it isn’t considered “hear say.” But, this way, defendant has his story told “through,” another person - a person who must be a licensed doctor & expert witness (otherwise, it’s “hearsay,”) and keeps a deeply troubled & unable to follow attorney instructions while on a stand, OFF it. Again, without ever uttering the words, “I can’t answer that question bc I’m invoking my 5th Amendment right to not self incriminate.” That…. That is the reason for the “hired psychiatrist.” FTR- MB is NOT pleading “TEMPORARY insanity.” He’s pleading “INSANITY.” Who in the WORLD would want an “INSANE,” man who tried to murder TWO people,” in a sport as a trainer, Olympian, competitor or even ENTHUSIAST who might show up on a show grounds with other human beings. 0.
I guess that was my “PS.” Maybe I’ll have a PPS. Oh yes! Reasons I might have a “top 5,” law firm on retainer- which have nothing to do with “defending me,” : For instance, going after a huge organization? Or, building a gargantuan case AGAINST a person or persons and taking that case TO a “huge organization,” in a manner which cannot be ignored bc every i has been dotted & T crossed. Idk? I can think of 50 reasons to retain such a firm and keep that firm all the way to the finish line…… wherever that may be. Idk? Could be ANY of those right??? (Right!!)
And a PPPS: By @eggbutt “ These similar posters really, really like the term, “be careful what you say” don’t they? Shall we discuss 1st Amendment Rights?”
Me- Yes! Let’s. The First Amendment DOES NOT protect the following:
1.) clear & present danger
2.) slander
3.) libel
4.) hate speech
5.) “inciting violence/fighting words”
6.) obscenities
7.) DEFAMATION of character
8.) forgot the 8th one…… but I’m certain you have violated at LEAST half of these, just here.
Interesting. Another person who takes over the comments section using the exact same syntax as yourself must just be “a similar, similar poster?”
I got more. Wanna see em?