Barisone Trial Starting Monday, 3/28

[OntheFnce]

@Knights_Mom

@Jealoushe

The judge just expressed how important it is that it is to correct them. I think the judge knows more than the posters here about his job? It’s very common in trials for people to object because of hearsay, but most lawyers also understand this and don’t try and keep entering hearsay.

I just don’t think it’s understood here what hearsay is.

He just said its not bad character reference/evidence to LK, it is only simply to show that MB learned about the incident.

Bad character evidence is not being allowed on LK. Only confirmation of the things that took place.

Clearly you are unaware of the existence of committees on judicial conduct and the appellate type courts who exist to correct and sometimes censor judicial conduct.

This ^

https://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/acjc.html?lang=eng

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@ToN_Farm

Attorney can’t seem to grasp that hearsay isn’t permitted.

Then with the CPS worker, he tried to claim that the CPS worker stating what she herself said was hearsay!

[Nous]

censor or censure?

[soloudinhere]

@hut-ho78

So, not nonsense, except for the careful selection of partial posts for a response.

Are you trying to suggest that I should have inferred from the one post I responded to, some number of other posts, from other posters, that you were presumably invisibly referring to in your response?

That goes back to utter nonsense.

[frugalannie]

@LexInVA

The exact reason for the worker visiting the property has not been disclosed, beyond the fact that it was a local authorities referral from Safesport. MHG was the focus of her visit, on a report of neglect.

I think it was mentioned somewhere above that the SafeSport complaint was some 700 pages long, and that it was doubtful that SafeSport had yet had the resources to review it. If they made a referral to local authorities, they must have had a chance to look it over, I would think.

Please enlighten me if I’m wrong.

[LexInVA]

John G: ​I’ve lost most of my immediate family and even that didn’t make me as distraught as LK did

@John G, if her father was such a high-powered, rich lawyer why didn’t he find her a place to live. Family squabbles or not.

John G
​@sandra because at the time (rob told me himself) he was concerned about rob leaving her after he bought her the house

John G
Rob has his own hidden agenda because he’d be out on the street without her . Rob is broke and lives off her

John G
​I’m a victim of LK. She had me and my horse blacklisted and fired from a 140k a year job for not giving her a phone # I was not permitted to give her. She tormented my life to where I was suicidal

John G
My horse is already mysteriously injured permanently
I do strongly feel she did on the late hours /early morning of a night . We had the same farrier and she does 6 horses with him vs my 1 , he stated people would pay people to hurt and or…

[Knights_Mom]

@OntheFnce

@Knights_Mom

@Jealoushe

The judge just expressed how important it is that it is to correct them. I think the judge knows more than the posters here about his job? It’s very common in trials for people to object because of hearsay, but most lawyers also understand this and don’t try and keep entering hearsay.

I just don’t think it’s understood here what hearsay is.

He just said its not bad character reference/evidence to LK, it is only simply to show that MB learned about the incident.

Bad character evidence is not being allowed on LK. Only confirmation of the things that took place.

Clearly you are unaware of the existence of committees on judicial conduct and the appellate type courts who exist to correct and sometimes censor judicial conduct.

This ^

https://www.njcourts.gov/attorneys/acjc.html?lang=eng

I once got called as a witness to an action against a judge where the judge ultimately was forced to resign. And he had big Supreme Court plans for his future.

Committees who adjudicate judicial conduct do not f*** around.

[LexInVA]

You are referring to the wrong complaint. LK was said to have filed one of her own.

[frugalannie]

Thank you. Didn’t know there were multiple complaints.

[hut-ho78]

@Knights_Mom

@hut-ho78

@Fiesta01

Hmm, that sounds oddly like trying to threaten posters here. Or at least trying to make posters feel uneasy.

Yes I agree. @endlessclimb is threatening SS actions against LK on this forum for what she calls attacks against her but is ignoring all the comments made about LK. Weird.

I see veiled threats against posters here by those in opposition of justice being served.

I don’t think “veiled” is a word that describes anything said on this forum.

[MHM]

I have a question I forgot to ask yesterday. At one point, MB was putting some sort of headset in his ears. Was that to help him hear better? Or to prevent him from hearing what was going on? I couldn’t tell. Does anyone know?

[LexInVA]

It is said that LK filed one after learning - through the surveillance devices, apparently - that MB and MHG had contacted them, regarding her.

[rothmpp]

I don’t think we can make any assumptions on that based on the testimony as the details of the report were kept off the record. The case worker’s testimony was very general when it came to the report details.

It would be reasonable to me that the case worker would speak with the bio parent first and alone about any reported neglect and supposed abuse of a child by her partner, and then determine based on that discussion who else she may want to speak with. If MB was coming in several times during the discussion he very well may have heard parts of the conversation.

[LexInVA]

It looked like he was having his hearing muzzled, but that was likely a hearing aid, upon second look.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Jealoushe

@TwiSedai

That’s exactly what I meant. I would think hearing RG threaten others would also affect MBs mindset.

Yes but they have to ask MB that, not RC. That was the issue.

But Bilinkas wants to get it out of RC, because he doesn’t want to put Barisone on the stand.

[RND]

@rothmpp

I don’t think we can make any assumptions on that based on the testimony as the details of the report were kept off the record. The case worker’s testimony was very general when it came to the report details.

It would be reasonable to me that the case worker would speak with the bio parent first and alone about any reported neglect and supposed abuse of a child by her partner, and then determine based on that discussion who else she may want to speak with. If MB was coming in several times during the discussion he very well may have heard parts of the conversation.

She specifically said she was not there for an allegation against MB, and that the allegation was for neglect, not sexual abuse.

[Knights_Mom]

@hut-ho78

@Knights_Mom

@hut-ho78

@Fiesta01

Hmm, that sounds oddly like trying to threaten posters here. Or at least trying to make posters feel uneasy.

Yes I agree. @endlessclimb is threatening SS actions against LK on this forum for what she calls attacks against her but is ignoring all the comments made about LK. Weird.

I see veiled threats against posters here by those in opposition of justice being served.

I don’t think “veiled” is a word that describes anything said on this forum.

The threat you posted, WAS.

[frugalannie]

Nevermind.

[LexInVA]

It was said that LK contacted Safesport and Safesport contacted the local authorities, who sent the worker out. The worker testified that she was there for a visit due to a referral from Safesport.

[Dragonfly90]

They filled claims against each other.