I am also surprised the comment about JH was allowed or ask to rephrase it as picky as this judge has been about comments about those who are not on trial.
4 Likes
Testimony under oath for the purposes of this trial could potentially be admitted in another trial so long as the preparer of the transcript is prepared to certify that they were present when the statement was made and the transcript is a true and accurate record of the proceedings.
It doesn’t replace testimony as the respondent in the second case has the right to cross examine.
8 Likes
She dodged all the questions about number and placement by throwing RG under the bus, saying she really didn’t know because HE did it all!
12 Likes
Not pointless at all. If those devices were in places that were clearly not ‘our apartment and my rented locker’ then they are more concrete proof of illegal recording. She swears she never recorded in the office, for example. If the police or anyone later checked and found a recording device in the office, that assertion goes down the drain, does it not?
There are very compelling reasons to remove the physical devices even though they don’t themselves contain recorded material, the most obvious being that you do not want to admit to having put them certain places. Pretty obvious and straightforward.
NB: not saying that this happened, just addressing your assertion of removal being pointless, as one does in a true-crime chat.
19 Likes
Setting aside any legal ramifications, who would accept the horses under those circumstances? What would that conversation sound like?
“So MB, my old friend, why are you dropping these horses off here?”
MB:”Um…”
9 Likes
By me that’s if there was a stenographer in the courtroom. Nowadays there often isn’t so a disc is made which can be transcribed by the courts court reporter (cheaper) or a business licensed to do so.
Pages are double spaced and $15 a page was old going rate. No idea about now.
2 Likes
No. It’s up to each prosecutor whether they think it’s a worthwhile pursuit and if they have enough evidence to level charges.
5 Likes
Thank you.
~~ Proudly employed ‘Burger Flipper’ ~~
8 Likes
I appreciate you.
Proudly retired court vacuumer.
14 Likes
If that’s the case then another person who witnessed the testimony, juror, lawyer, court officer, anyone who was present in the courtroom at the time could also make such an attestation.
4 Likes
You’re welcome. I’m an underpaid poop-scooper, myself! Actually, just got upgraded to post poop fan-cleaner-upper. V. Exciting!
10 Likes
I had made a comment asking what the police had testified about regarding the camera.
1 Like
I embellished it further.
~~ Proudly employed ‘Burger flipper’ ~~
3 Likes
Thanks. I didn’t know that.
3 Likes
We are hoi polloi who have climbed uncomfortably high according to some on and off this site.
~~ Proudly employed ‘Burger flipper’ ~~
3 Likes
Please notice I have refrained from saying “I told you (g) so”. I’ll hold off until next week and will have t-shirts available for all.
Which LK personality will show up today I wonder? RG’s testimony is going to be super interesting.
18 Likes
Does he testify after her?
2 Likes
Speaking of which. Does anyone happen to know where MB was living in New Jersey in the previous summer of 2018?
I just sort of wonder if part of the reason things went south was related to them all living under the same roof in the summer of 2019.
Even if there were separate living areas, I can imagine there could have been a little too much togetherness under the circumstances.
2 Likes
3 Likes
I’d love to know what Hurdy, Gurdy, Nellie and all her other FB BFF’s are thinking now. You know, the ones who contributed to her ugly posts with pure glee?
15 Likes
