It’s a problem. I made a statement about the ear witness yesterday, using the words “speculating” and “might have heard”, and Eggbutt seemed to miss those small but vital qualifiers and think I was claiming to have personal access to what the ear witness will testify to in court. I don’t.
To clarify:
I think the testimony of the ear witness will be crucial. I suspect (speculate) that the ear witness is the lawyer LK was working with on the move out, but do not know his (or her) identity.
The movie I have in my head of the shooting is based on the assumption that the narrative provided by LK is true. I understand that for those who don’t believe her narrative, you will have very different movies.
But when I play my movie and black out the video to listen to just the soundtrack, I can imagine what the ear witness heard. I think the soundtrack provided by the ear witness will go a long way in ruling out various scenarios that have been constructed.
The ear witness in the Vertetis case was an important witness in that case.