The verdict seems the best for all parties. Itās the one verdict where all parties have a chance to rebuild their lives.
It will be interesting to see when or even if MB is released. We wonāt know if they do a real analysis and find severe TBI from repeated concussions or other cognitive decline from aging or any other mental disorders. If he can improve and be released, then he can apply to SafeSport to be re-instated. Since it is established he shot a client/tenant twice in the chest, I donāt know how they will approach that.
LK can settle down now that the trial is over or maybe after the hearing. Ignoring posters on SM would help. She can go on with riding, recovery, and possibly physical therapy to get over her injuries. The barn she is at looks lovely and the training looks great from YouTube videos. Whatever the motive of posting the interesting lesson, it was good to see her in training.
I donāt know what SafeSport will do with online bullying. If they go for one then they go for all. Online bullying can be avoided by not looking at social media and by ignoring what is said. I donāt know what laws concern that.
Older communications have some established laws concerning harassment or sending bad information.
I think itās probably time to ask the moderators to shut the threads down until there is new information such as MB being released.
I remember the exchange extremely well because you attacked me, viciously, and I dropped out by putting you on ignore, and you used the occasion to drop in another nasty comment about me. I then watched you attack RND. She did use the term āburger flipperā, but not in a disparaging way to low skilled workers. The idea that she was disrespectful of low skilled workers was entirely manufactured by you. Youāre extremely clever.
Iām engaging you because in contrast to the extremely civil tone of these most recent threads, you went after Rowdy for using the term ācockroachesā, hypocritically claiming you would never stoop to saying anything so nasty!
āStalking you from thread to threadā? I did not have time to respond to your post in the previous thread before it was closed and the traffic redirected here. Duh. But my following the modās directive you describe as āstalkingā.
Iāve thought for a while youāre DreadPirateRoberts, but have refrained from āspeculatingā on the issue because I know doing so is provocative. But why should I play nice when others feel free to speculate on the identity of IM and anyone who is the least bit sympathetic to LK? Goose/Gander.
Others seem to agree that to be credited with the DreadPirateRoberts posts is a compliment.
I saw it happen, and Iāve been looking for clips but canāt find any. It was on CourtTV during a break from all things Johnny Dept. I was channel surfing and landed there while they replayed the verdict.
Quick summary - this is why they never took The plea. It was all or nothing, and they didnāt want lessers included. What Michael wants is for the truth to come out.
They asked him about the straight NGās with regards to RG and he said something I donāt remember and, āthis makes everything even better (or sweeter).
Letās do the worst possible thing to the Kanarek family.
The thing that will hurt them the most.
.
.
.
.
Letās stop talking about them.
Completely.
Letās stop feeding the drama llamas and the attention wh*&es; letās stop giving them a narrative they will feel compelled to counter.
Letās talk about Barisone, find a way to send him get well cards, support JH and MHG, support dressage in general but let us in all ways pretend that the Kanareks and their sock puppets donāt exist.
It will be hard, but I promise, there will be no worse fate for them than to be treated as if they are unworthy of attention or donāt exist. .
Iām a regular person and I been involved with mental health professionals since a young age due to abuse of many types. My therapy had almost always consisted of more than one mental health professional on my āteamā in different capacities. The simplest of which has been the team of psychiatric doctor and general counselor who took care of my medical and mental health needs together, as they related to the issues I was dealing with. This is not unusual in the scope of my own dealings with mental health professionals over the course of 40+ years.
Perhaps because he doesnāt think it would be a good idea for a juror to expose themselves to any sort of attack by Klan Kanerek.
Or it could be that he was/is concerned that a juror (or jurors) will reveal that they thought he (da judge) appeared to show a definite bias in favor of the prosecution.
Iām curious what Judge T would think of the civil attorney dragging the jury the way he did on Court TV. That was so bad even CourtTV experts have questioned whether or not the NJ Bar will censure him.
I know Judge T has no authority to do anything about it. Just curious what he thinks.