She can read the forums although she is banned.
Funny how useless anything she says is, now, after the revelations in the trial.
I wouldnât call it useless. The statements that she made, when exposed to the light of day and the truths revealed by the trial, offer a glaring insight as to the level of deception imposed upon us and the world.
Her own statements and postings, along with her own behavior, show everyone all that needs to be known about this person.
Yes, but having a small retinue means there are always eyes on, if you will. She used to represent that she did not keep up here but only engaged when she was alerted by others of something of interest.
The other thing that @CurrentlyHorseless refuses to acknowledge is that of Eggbutt and LK, only one has been banned here, and it is NOT Eggbutt.
Why is that?
The moderators here do an incredible job, especially concerning the number of threads and posts about the Barisone case and trial. Not only moderating the written posts on the forum, but many of us have had to go to them concerning threats made to us by LK.
CurrentlyHorseless insisting that Eggbuttâs post are anywhere near the realm of crap that has been spewed by LK are nothing short of hilarious, and insults the ability of the moderators here.
CurrentlyHorseless wants us to believe their narrative that Eggbutt was nastier than LK, as if that is even possible!
I do know these things.
-
Eggbutt is still here and able to post freely.
-
LK is not here as she earned a ban, and is not able to post freely.
-
Eggbutt has never threatened me or my livelihood on this forum.
-
LK is not the only person who is downright delusional about what happened.
CH showed her/his hand with the VKB/MHG comment. Definitely someone who knows more in real life than she/he will admit. eggbutt is upfront that she/he has personal knowledge of the people involved. CH you should admit your own personal knowledge/involvement if you expect to have any credibility.
Thanks for posting those, Trub. I am not sure I remember seeing them before but I was struck by IMâs comment that the jury didnât need to hear testimony about âcharacterâ to reach a decision. It seemed to me that IM seemed to be a bit worried about such testimony. Gee, I wonder why?
And regarding MBâs alleged âviolent, erratic temperâ - donât you think if that were the case, the prosecution would have dragged in a plethora of witnesses who could support that viewpoint?
[Edited - typo!]
Well, he did contact a PI to conduct a background investigation about the drug addict grifters who refused to vacate his property and whose campaign of terror was escalating from just social media to actual physical acts (such as creeping around the barn at night, installing hidden cameras and recording devices, secretly recording private conversations between others at the barn, sneaking into MBâs office and attempting to access his files, safe, etc. (maybe even succeeding at thatâŠ), calling in false reports to SS, calling in FI and BI to report âcode violationsâ (the same code violations they had been living with for how many months?), etc. etc.
I truly, truly, truly hope the contents of the PIâs report are revealed during the civil cases. Judge Taylor shut down any testimony about that information, and I canât help but think that if the jury had been allowed to hear it, the verdict would have been a straight up NG.
I venture to say the only person the prosecution could find willing to testify to this is the person who posted here. If our curious questions to her caused her to flee the forum and delete her posts, imagine how she would have held up being questioned by Bilinkas! IMO, people who are afraid of someone and/or believe they are dangerous and unethical, donât go back to them a second time. Credibility dissolves. I donât doubt this person felt something but it certainly wasnât to the degree weâve been led to believe it was and I hope she can get past her anguish of her experience.
I explained how you can find it. AND you have yet to answer my question why you support her/them? Should be a simple answer.
I may be very late and this is unnecessary. In case it isnât - read on.
On my phone there is a little arrow that appears on the right hand side, under the text box. Click on that. It will ask where to choose a file. I go to âfilesâ and choose the most recent photo/screen shot. It will upload.
I will attach the screen shot so you can see what I see.
Her recent postings seem to me to be an attempt to bolster her civil suit. But my sense is that they will have the opposite effect. With every post, she reveals who and what she really is.
I hope the civil trial can be watched online. It will strip away the mask entirely.
Aha! Am totally blind. Thank you!
They arenât groundbreaking, but here we go. She just canât help herself from replying to complete strangers on social media, justified or not. Taken last night:
Wow.
Apparently some time after she made that post, she found out that it was not, in fact, the reason safe sport was created. Which was why she had to drag the kids into it.
I am amused. She knows that this wasnât permitted by the judge in this trial because MB was the defendant. The civil case though? The gloves come off and she is laid bare. RG too.
I recall that. It was one of her off-the-rails-crazy posts.