Huh? And, I’m involved in this how?
Let’s make this really easy for you to comprehend, ONE (1) person contacted me after the shooting regarding LK, that is until the past 6 months or so. That ONE (1) person was not HB, as I’ve said, I’ve known her for years. No one contacted me prior to the shooting! Can I spell it out any more clear for you?
Come on, just spit out whatever it is you really are asking and let’s cut to the chase, mkay?
You must be speaking about a different LK. One who hasn’t lied and threatened the posters of this board.
Poor LK!! Always the victim!!
The only point LK could have had other folks following her SM on her behalf was when the various legal teams were compiling her SM dumpster fire for various upcoming trials. Other than that she clearly cycles through moments of SM obsession and fixate on old threads. She can go on and read all this anonymously like any no member but it’s harder to track unread posts when you aren’t logged in.
I am getting the distinct impression that CH and a few others are deliberately trying to goad folks into revealing “what they know and when they knew it” so they can pass that info to Klan Kanerek (which includes not only the K family members but also their attorneys).
It might be wise to be very careful about revealing any info the K’s can use in the civil litigation.
If that were true, the prosecutor utterly failed to provide the proof because it would have shown premeditation. As Schellhorn did NOT have any proof that MB went and bought ammunition for that handgun, it was not brought up. Either he is a good attorney who lost his case or he is an incompetent one who overlooked a very easy way to prove premeditation. Choose.
This is for HH, not KM
Thanks for acknowledging that you were contacted regarding LK by an insider after the shooting.
Given that MB/MHG were compiling information on others who had had SM spats with LK prior to the shooting, and given that you knew both HB and MHG, I thought perhaps you were involved prior to the shooting as well. But you have now clearly denied that. Thanks.
Oooh, a conspiracy …
And now, thanks to the criminal trial, we have RG on the record as saying he never worked so much that he “Got ahead of what she owed at that moment”. So there goes her claim of money owed to RG. And unless she had been hired to clean stalls (gasp) or vacuum to help work off training? Her claims regarding the civil case don’t stand.
Sheilah
No. Trying heroin once does not make you an addict.
Anything is possible (lying to sell it illegally), but not terribly likely.
DID I SAY INSIDER? Nope. My God, you are more than tiresome. It’s easy to keep track of things when one tells the truth. Makes life and memory so frigging much easier!!!
Schellhorn said premeditation was not required for attempted murder. He did not need to show premeditation.
He did emphasize that MB asked the CPS woman to leave the office, got the gun, removed the dummy magazine, loaded the gun, got in the truck, and drove to the farmhouse.
Most addicts use language like that because trying it once was the mistake that led them to full blown addiction. Generally, the first time is what they consider the mistake because without it, there wouldn’t be a second time. Someone near and dear to me, who battled their way back from heroin addiction described it like this:
That first heroin high is so indescribable, so beautiful, that you become desperate to seek that feeling out again. Heroin becomes the devil promising you, just one more time, we’ll get there again. Meanwhile, your body is building up the need to have it. Without it you feel physically sicker than you’ve ever felt in your life, and the devil is telling your brain, just one more time. You’ll feel better. So you get more and more desperate for that just one more time. You’d sell your grandma’s soul for one more time.
It’s not that they tried it once and walked away. It’s just that first time was the mistake that led to more.
It’s hard for me to understand because, well, I’ve never tried it, nor do I intend to. But every addict I’ve known, when they’re being honest, they use very similar language.
Another tidbit for you…I had no idea things were going south with LK while she was with MB/MHG. I was thankful she was out of NC, as was everyone else in this state dressage goes to die! 
She is liked here by only two people I am aware of, and they really don’t know her other than her SM!
Did not say that. He said he didn’t work more because he didn’t want to get too far ahead of the $2,500 a month owed for the third horse, and because MB didn’t always have the materials bought. He said that at the time of the shooting he thought he was, in fact ahead.
Too bad there wasn’t a written agreement on the scope of work, and the payment schedule. It was all a sloppy, loosey goosey arrangement.
That’s as good a reason as any other for all your ridiculous, prying, imaginative questions.
No, he didn’t emphasize the bold. He didn’t address that at all. He couldn’t emphasize that he did that since there was no proof or evidence that he did. He just heavily implied that he did and then the judge hamstring the defense’s ability to present the evidence to provide reasonable doubt.
OK. He heavily implied it. The implication worked for me, and, I think, the jurors.
He did emphasize that premeditation was not required for attempted murder; that an impulse was sufficient.
Wow, talk about lying! Schellhorn never said anything of the kind in the courtroom!! Did you hear him making that wild a$$ assumption somewhere else? NO ONE WITNESSED BARISONE TAKE THE GUN ANYWHERE!
Unless there was. And the ninja that bragged about having access to his office and MB’s contracts made it disappear. MB, in his increasingly fragile and frantic state, might have forgotten since it wasn’t his most pressing issue or might have believed it didn’t exist if he couldn’t find it.
That’s how it happens in my movie anyway. There’s just as much evidence either way. No one on either side has said a written contract didn’t exist, that I can find evidence of.
Wait, YOU can now imagine, suspect, theorize, guess, imply but that has been verboten for anyone else since the shooting?
News flash @CurrentlyHorseless, the criminal trial is OVER. MB was found NOT GUILTY. It’s gonna be fun if your SWAG is brought up during the Civil trial! 
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use