Talk about imagination and making assumptions!!! MHG was long before divorced when she matched up with MB. I don’t know why she doesn’t have primary custody of her children, never asked her, don’t care, and none of my business!
Now, why don’t you tell us every minute detail of YOUR life? Hmmm? You are so very interested in the lives of others, it’s only fair you share with the forum too! 'eh?
Asking why LK turns on people is fairly pointless. This kind of behavior can be understood as part of the cluster B and addict personality traits package.
Such people eventually turn on everyone, and when they are going down a particular paranoid delusional rabbit hole with one person, they will widen the hole to take in anyone nearby.
There will be some confusing story about what happened but it’s just the delusion expanding. The only real answer to “why?” is “because she was there.”
Really?? If that’s the case, you certainly do seem to spend an awful lot of time thinking about it. And researching the subject. And apparently documenting it. And posting about it. At exceedingly great length.
Why are we even wandering down this path? Nobody knows whether Ali comes to Paradigm or Leif goes to Ali. Nobody knows if Ali or Leif has requested that LK not be there at certain times and frankly, it’s nobody’s business but theirs. In either case, nobody has any idea if the teaching arrangement is in any way related to LK. This is where all the speculating and making up scenarios just gets silly.
If Leif does travel to Ali’s for lessons I’d suspect it has more to do with her being a busy Olympian with a packed schedule. Much easier to slot someone in for an hour in her own ring rather than leaving her farm to teach. I know several people who train with BNT’s in FL and they all ship or hack to the BMT for lessons.
Speculating on timelines for divorces etc is prurient and disgusting. From the outside we actually don’t know when a couple first separated (it might be long before the public separation) and couples can stay separated for years if it does not make financial sense to officially divorce and split the assets right away.
The only thing that is relevant is if all the parties involved present the seperation as fair and amicable. It says a lot about a man who can navigate several consecutive relationships and have all the women remain supportive and positive.
Trying to piece together public records to imagine some prurient situation that could throw shade on an individual when everyone involved says things were fair is just disgusting.
They don’t care that what they are posting is inaccurate even with being told several times they are wrong. They are truly obsessed with finding any possible reason to not accept that 100% of the events of August 2019 lies squarely with LK and her cohorts.
MICHAEL BARISONE HAD A GOOD LIFE UNTIL LAUREN KANAREK DECIDED TO FINISH THE BA$TARD!!!
You hit the nail on the head. I don’t accept the 100% responsibility attributed to LK and RG.
I think the situation was a disaster brewing, and I think LK, RG, MB, MHG, and RC all contributed to the explosive situation.
LK is far from blameless. But to claim that MB, MHG, and RC did not have major roles and responsibility in creating the situation that led MB to have a mental breakdown is nuts.
Wow, you’ve just invented a whole, reasonably complex, narrative around something that you don’t know is true or not (twice, in your own words), because you believe a random person on a public forum knows things.
I agree, the narrative being spun by CH is at this point pretty much imaginative fiction. Whatever comments by LK they are rooted in, are likely untrue because LK lies on SM all the time.
Its really easy to sit home and imagine plausible scenarios for people’s lives. If you have skills and talent and are relatively sane this can be a strong basis for becoming a novelist
However it’s really important to realize that if you create fantasy narratives about real people that they are not true and should not be argued in public as if they are.
Creating fantasies and then believing they are true is going down the delusional path.
It one thing to suggest scenarios but quite another to swear them as truths when what you’re suggesting and swearing to isn’t involved in the issue at hand in the first place.
In her testimony on the witness stand, LK did answer “yes” when the prosecution ask her if she was seeing a psychiatrist and an addiction specialist. Just a FYI—who knows if it was the truth.
I’m pretty sure the question was “seeing” not “under the care of”, but I’m not going back to verify that.
Yeah, I’m not believing that, but it really makes little difference what any of us believe. I can imagine Deininger/Bilinkas calling the person as a witness for the civil trial.
Will part of the discovery be complete medical records exchanged on both MB and LK?