Classical Dressage ?
Mr. Sanders;
I went to your website and in your Mission Statement this caught my eye: “OUR competitions will be to see if we can show MOMENTS of what we desire.”
I had the privilege of meeting Mr. Racinet and moments are not what he sought. I have had the privilege of meeting a couple of individuals who knew N. Oliveira and they referenced that is was more than moments sought after.
Dr. Klimke never sought moments, and he was most effective in presenting classical dressage in the competitive arena.
I have read Baucher finding something he says as informative and others as void of the horse’s requirements.
I have personally known several U. S. Cavalry officers and am well aware of the schooling methods practiced.
So I must disagree with your presentation of Baucher, et al, simply because you are leaving out the requirements of the horse. Col. Podhajsky was always seeking a better line of communication with the horse and never lost sight of the fact that the horses are our teachers, we are not the teachers of the horse.
What we ask of our horses, they can already accomplish. It is our interference with their fluidity, suppleness and correct engagement of the forehand, back and hindquarters that degenerates the wondrous movements of the horse.
Numerous individuals have stated to you in this thread that the horse is not in collection, the back is not up. the hindfeet are not in correct action.
Yet you insist that what we see is correct and ok. I believe you are doing a disservice to dressage riders and observers through the presentation of inadequate dressage. Sir, an unridden horse can animate better dressage than what you presented.
It is one thing to discuss the old classical masters, it is another to present that which they were surely not working for.