Belgian Drafts for Dressage

But everyone says that crossing breeds is bad, yet one of the stallions is TB, arabian, and trakhener (wb)?

Yet those who are getting excellent results doing draft crosses by using the same knowledge (using horses with proven breeding ability for the purpose they are using them for) are just getting lucky.

AWS is also picky with their breeding stock, from what I understand from people who use them for breeding approvals.

I’m not trying to dis your programs, just maybe open your minds that others are taking the same care and getting good results with draft crosses. There’s a reason that draft crosses are so popular, and that is that some of them (notably percheron, shire, and clyde x TB) work really well if done right.

Like WBs, those doing it the MOST right are getting the best results (notably Forest Hill) and those taking the least amount of care are getting the worst results. AWS is the only registry that allows people to actually register them, get them rated if they want to breed them, etc.

I guess I don’t think it’s fair to compare the best of the european warmblood world, with their decades of progress in breeding, to the worst of the draft cross world, with some guy with a PMU ranch in Canada and some short necked draft mares and a grade stallion. Even the best of the draft cross world (a.k.a. the American Warmblood ;)) isn’t up to the best of the euro WB world yet, but it’s definitely in competition with the lower end and middle of the road WB breeders.

I WILL ANWSER IN CAPS, IM NOT YELLING…JUST MAKING IT EASIER TO READ AND REPLY

But everyone says that crossing breeds is bad, yet one of the stallions is TB, arabian, and trakhener (wb)?
NOBODY SAID THAT CROSS BREEDING IS BAD, THOSE BREED TYPES HAVE BEEN KNOWN TO CROSS WELL WITHIN AND PROVE TO MAKE SUCESSFUL SPORTHORSES BASED ON THE OVERALL BRED STANDARD. BUT THEY ARE EXTREAMLY PICKY.

Yet those who are getting excellent results doing draft crosses by using the same knowledge (using horses with proven breeding ability for the purpose they are using them for) are just getting lucky.

DRAFTS ARE NOT KNOWN TO BE SPORT HORSES FOR THE USE OF UPPER LEVEL SPORTS, WHICH IS THE OVERALL GOAL OF MOST OF THE ASSN/REGISTIRES. IM SORRY AND I KNOW YOU DONT WANT TO HEAR THAT, BUT THAT IS THE FACT, BUT IM TIRED OF TRYING TO EXPLAIN THIS. I DO ADMIRE YOUR LOVE FOR THE BREED THOU.

AWS is also picky with their breeding stock, from what I understand from people who use them for breeding approvals.

IF THEY HAD BREEDING RULES THAT WOULD BE ONE THING, BUT BECAUSE I CAN GET FULL REGISTRY PAPERS ON ANY HORSE OF WB GENETICS AND THEN BRED BACK TO THAT HORSE AND STILL REGISTER THE OFFSPRING, THAT IS NOT WHAT I CALL HAVING ANY CONTROL OF BREEDING PRACTICES OF EVEN HAVING A CONTROL FACTOR IN BREED TYPE.

I’m not trying to dis your programs, just maybe open your minds that others are taking the same care and getting good results with draft crosses. There’s a reason that draft crosses are so popular, and that is that some of them (notably percheron, shire, and clyde x TB) work really well if done right.

YES, SOME ARE DOING GREAT OUT THERE AND SOME ARE MAKING THEIR OWNERS VERY PROUD, BUT THEY CAN NOT AND WILL NOT BE A OVERALL PICK FOR A SERIOUS DRESSAGE RIDER OR BREEDER, THAT IS JUST THE FACTS AS MOST ARE BUILT TO PULL AND NOT BE A RIDING HORSE FOR UPPER LEVEL WORK.

Like WBs, those doing it the MOST right are getting the best results (notably Forest Hill) and those taking the least amount of care are getting the worst results. AWS is the only registry that allows people to actually register them, get them rated if they want to breed them, etc.

DOES AWS HAVE ANY APPROVED DRAFT CROSSES FOR STALLIONS ON THEIR LIST?? NOT SURE?

I guess I don’t think it’s fair to compare the best of the european warmblood world, with their decades of progress in breeding, to the worst of the draft cross world, with some guy with a PMU ranch in Canada and some short necked draft mares and a grade stallion. Even the best of the draft cross world (a.k.a. the American Warmblood ;)) isn’t up to the best of the euro WB world yet, but it’s definitely in competition with the lower end and middle of the road WB breeders.

THEN WHEN DONT WE SEE MORE OF THESE CROSSES IN THE YOUNG HORSE CHAMPIONSHIPS AND SUCH RELATED COMEPTITIONS?

STF, DON"T YOU KNOW THAT ANY HORSE CAN DO THE GP?

THE ONLY REASON THERE ARE NO CLYDES OR MINIS OR MULES AT AACHEN IS BECAUSE THE JUDGES ARE ALL CORRUPT AND EVIL!!

ALL HORSES ARE EQUAL IN AMERICA AND CAN DO EVERY DISCIPLINE FROM RACING TO DRESSAGE TO BARREL RACING TO JUMPING TO CUTTING TO DRIVING TO PULLING EQUALLY WELL !!

NEVERMIND SPORT FOCUSED SELECTIVE BREEDING .

THE USA IS THE LAND OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY!!

No, but draft CROSSES are doing well as sporthorses, when people use proven crosses. It’s the same concept- use what works, learn from what doesn’t. A Clydesdale x Haflinger might not be a great cross, but perch or shire x tb is nice if you choose the right breeding stock.

IF THEY HAD BREEDING RULES THAT WOULD BE ONE THING, BUT BECAUSE I CAN GET FULL REGISTRY PAPERS ON ANY HORSE OF WB GENETICS AND THEN BRED BACK TO THAT HORSE AND STILL REGISTER THE OFFSPRING, THAT IS NOT WHAT I CALL HAVING ANY CONTROL OF BREEDING PRACTICES OF EVEN HAVING A CONTROL FACTOR IN BREED TYPE.
Having a "registered AWS’ doesn’t mean much, since there’s no inspection (just scores). But, having a “registered Belgian WB” and having a breeding approved Belgian WB aren’t the same thing either, are they? Breeding approval is hard to get with AWS, so those who use their breeding approval are going through an entirely different process.

YES, SOME ARE DOING GREAT OUT THERE AND SOME ARE MAKING THEIR OWNERS VERY PROUD, BUT THEY CAN NOT AND WILL NOT BE A OVERALL PICK FOR A SERIOUS DRESSAGE RIDER OR BREEDER, THAT IS JUST THE FACTS AS MOST ARE BUILT TO PULL AND NOT BE A RIDING HORSE FOR UPPER LEVEL WORK.

Maybe you need to know a little more about Forest Hill and what they have accomplished. No, they are not going to be the go-to for the people who have 6 figures to spend on a horse, but their horses are competitive with similarly priced WBs.

DOES AWS HAVE ANY APPROVED DRAFT CROSSES FOR STALLIONS ON THEIR LIST?? NOT SURE?
I can only go by those that have links, but there’s a couple of Friesian x

http://www.riveroaksfarm.net/Lexington.html
http://www.riveroaksfarm.net/Charleston.html

A purebred Friesian
http://www.americanwarmblood.org/approval/stallions/zorro.htm

A quarter horse
http://www.bffarms.com/regal.cfm

Ooh, I found one!

http://www.pvec-pa.com/studsvs.html

There is a shire who has tons of successful offspring, but I can’t find any photos
(eleazars valley gator)

THEN WHEN DONT WE SEE MORE OF THESE CROSSES IN THE YOUNG HORSE CHAMPIONSHIPS AND SUCH RELATED COMEPTITIONS?
No idea.

AND DON’T YOU KNOW THAT WHEN YOU DON’T FEEL LIKE DISCUSSING SOMETHING ANYMORE, YOU CAN JUST STOP TALKING INSTEAD OF MAKING UP RANDOM $HIT TO SNARK ABOUT?

I am pretty sure STF knows that, but egon apparently didn’t get that memo.

Ambrey, I have the uncomfortable feeling that whatever breed of horse you owned, you would be saying exactly the same thing - fighting tooth and nail to prove to these people on this bulletin board that they are exceptionally talented at dressage and can do all the levels.

I feel you need to step back and think a little bit about why it is so very, very important to you to prove that draft and draft crosses are so suitable for dressage, and to so determinedly not listen to anythign anyone says, and just argue back. I think it’s worth thinking about.

"It’s bad to crossbreed, so Trak-Arab-Thb crosses are bad’.

This was part of one of your arguments. I’d like to suggest that while you may feel these are really airtight arguments you’re responding with, they make no sense.

By definition crossbreeding is ‘good’ when the results are more consistent. Cross breeding is ‘good’ when the results are closer to the target. Cross breeding fulfills these requirements when more closely related parents are bred.

The definition of crossbred is generally that the desire is to use the first generation result for the intended purpose, and that the cross is not intended to be developmental or breeding stock for a future goal. The goal of the cross bred is to create an individual from that cross breeding, that consistently meets a specific goal.

Horses that already have blood lines in common tend to cross more successfully.

Aside from a very tiny addition of Arabian blood to Percherons, there is still very little ‘blood’ in draft horses. This was very deliberate and the distinction between the heavy and light horse breeds and characteristics was very strong for many years in horse history. There were, however, very old ‘ride and drive’ breeds - very active, fancy gaited horses with a very balanced conformation, yet a ‘middle’ build - not terribly slim and light, but nothing like a draft horse in mass or conformation - these existed as a separate type from the large tall heavy draft breeds for a very, very long time. They were not draft-thb crosses - they existed as a separate type. THESE are the horses that were used to develop warmbloods - by adding Arab, Thoroughbred, and Trakehner bloodlines.

One of the most successful crossbreds in the history of horse breeding has been Arab-Thb. Thb were founded based on Arab and related blood. They cross very successfully. Another very successful cross - Arab-Thb-Trakehner. Why? Trakehner already contains tons of Arab and Thb blood. Another very successful cross is Thb - Warmblood. Why? Warmblood pedigrees have contained Thb blood for hundreds of years. Yes, it goes way back. It is not a recent addition. Not in any way, shape or form.

When the British tried to create a child’s show mount by crossing Icelandics and THoroughbreds, the results were deemed a disaster. Why? Lack of consistency and lack of results to the target (ideal). Why? Because for 900 years, Icelandic horses were completely isolated, and no outside breeding was allowed. The Icelandic ponies arrived in England completely isolated from any other bloodlines.

The Welsh thoroughbred crosses, on the other hand, involve crossing ponies that have had improvement stallions (esp arabs and other ‘blood’) already brought in. They already had ‘blood in common’. Efforts to create a childs show mount worked very well, and there was more consistency in the results, and closer to target results.

I have been told 'It’s terrible to cross (baroque) breeds with any other breeds, and very often, I have to agree, the results are disappointing. Yes, somemtimes results are good, but it’s a function of genetics that the results are going to be inconsistent. Yet this is being done extensively and many people are wild about the results. WHy is it done? Economics. You buy an andalusian or frieisian stallion, there are very few mares to breed him to. You want to get your investment back.

Pure draft as well as draft crosses aren’t meeting the elite standards for top horses, they really never were intended to even come close to that, they were intended to be family horses, to have fun on, a little local showing, not too much money. Some salesmen have gotten carried away - that’s too bad, but it doesn’t really change the situation.

There is a type of balance, conformation, back and gait required - as well as a basic type, a medium to light type that stands up to years and years of training - generally, they do not have it. The examples Ambrey gives lack the conformation and gaits to make inroads in the elite levels. The one thing I see, aside from balanced mass/conformation, most lacking is gait quality - suspension and suppleness, the kind one starts out with, before any training, or training is miserable for both horse and rider. The balance problems are obvious, as are the lack of consistency - breed the same draft stallion and Thb mare together, none of the offspring will be of quite the same type, mass, balance, etc…there’s a great deal of diversity (due to genetic scatter). Too, not too many breeders are choosing the finest specimens for both parents…that adds to the problems.

There are a few people doing very well at this, but even they don’t normally claim their horses are capable of beating the top dressage horses.

Many are working with second and third generation mares crossed to a THb stallion - the results 7/8 thb, 3/4 thb, and the draft blood comes from refined, upright, non-extreme draft types carefully evaluated (not with stable-blindness) for sport type and gait and balance, as well as light duty breeds like the Cleveland Bay and from the old Remount registry that carried part -Thb horses for years in America.

Some might make nice lower level horses, or win in higher classes at smaller local shows where classes are so small that they aren’t really competitive. The ones who will do very well at the upper levels are - exceptions.

I am very sure that if the draft crosses were fulfilling the FEI requirements, they would be making more inroads at the top levels. They aren’t. Competitors are picking horses for the top levels of sport that fit a fixed criteria. The criteria isn’t going to change because the criteria makes sense and is logical.

However, I think the horse Ambrey has is very appropriate for her. He’s quiet and seems very sensible, a good horse to learn the lower levels on and be safe.

Hey STF

Never Argue With An Idiot.
She/He’ll Drag You Down To Her/His Level And
Then Beat You With Experience.

By: Dr. Alan Zimmerman

AND DON’T YOU KNOW THAT WHEN YOU DON’T FEEL LIKE DISCUSSING SOMETHING ANYMORE, YOU CAN JUST STOP TALKING INSTEAD OF MAKING UP RANDOM $HIT TO SNARK ABOUT?

Actually, I don’t think you need to berate me so harshly since I post quite sparingly, not 30 plus posts a day, :eek: WOW! although I’m sure all your posts are very profound and extremely useful to others.:slight_smile:

This is your philosophy in a nutshell - it’s ok to berate people who, by your judgement, are stupid.

Did you know that almost nobody cares how often someone posts? Only what they post. And 5 nasty posts a day doesn’t make you look better than 30 nice ones.

Anyway, I believe I mentioned something earlier about people who don’t bother to read a thread, but reply based on what the grapevine tells them is probably being said. Same goes for making judgements about people.

This is your philosophy in a nutshell - it’s ok to berate people who, by your judgement, are stupid

I guess you are addressing Ambrey there. I did not realize she was berating me because she thought I was 'stupid". OW!

What’s your excuse for constantly berating people? Same thing?

I was discussing programs that I like, but they have little to do with my horse. The horses they produce look nothing like my horse, and none of them are breeding Percherons and Quarter Horses.

My horse is a big goofy guy who is a great dressage horse for an out of shape over 40 chick who wouldn’t even want to TRY to sit the trot on that horse that STF posted in another thread. He would like me to make the disclaimer that the day he propels himself that far off the ground, pigs will fly.

I noticed in your pictures Ambrey that your draft cross is going in a pelham or double bridle already and I think he is just broke at the walk and trot? Or does the trainer canter him and right now you just walk and trot him?

Is that because you find him difficult to manage with a snaffle due to his size and the thickness of his neck or is he strong for other reasons? Could any of that be due to his breed or conformation that make him difficult to do dressage with? People that have goals to “do dressage” might pick a horse that dressage comes easily to. Why set yourself up for failure and frustration? On the other hand someone might pick the breed first, understand the limitations, and have fun anyway.

A friend of mine once said this about arabians and I think it applies to any “non dressage” breed. “I didn’t pick arabs to do dressage with, I do dressage with my arabs.” Meaning that she accepts that arabs aren’t the best at climbing the levels in dressage but to her all that matters is that she likes arabs and she wants to ride them dressage. To her it’s about enjoying the breed you picked and doing however much it does best. It’s one thing to like a certain breed and be fine at doing the very best you can with them, it’s another to stubbornly insist that your breed can do it all, all the way to the top, and if he can’t it’s obviously a bias.

I was discussing programs that I like, but they have little to do with my horse. The horses they produce look nothing like my horse, and none of them are breeding Percherons and Quarter Horses

Can someone explain this to an allegedly ’ stupid’ person (me)

Re: Belgian drafts, draft horses in general …

… According to STF and others, we can’t ride them … according to Thomas, we can’t drive them … SHIT … we might as well eat them (like most Europeans do anyway) :no:

And obviously you can read either, since I have wrote over and over they are fine for lower levels and make superb AA horses for those just wanting to have fun in the ring.
READ PEOPLE, READ!!!
I know my english is not the best, but TRY!!! TRY!!! TRY!!!
:uhoh::rolleyes:

Ditto!

I have more experience with Belgians than with the typical dressage breeds. I use my Belgians for riding, not harness. I love riding drafts because they make my butt look small. :lol:

I don’t think it’s fair to say “all Belgians will do ___ well or can’t do ___”. I can say there is a WIDE variation between the types of Belgians. Belgian is the #1 draft-type breed in the US in sheer numbers & have many uses. Some are bred for showing and are tall and leggy (eg. halter classes). Some are stocky and bred for farm work (eg. hobby farmers). Some lines are exceptionally muscular and have exceptional draft in the collars (eg. for pulling competitions). Some are extremely tough & have a great work ethic, but conformation may be in between tall-leggy and short-stout (eg. Amish). Some are PMUs with any sort of conformation, as long as mom produced lots of urine in the process. Some are just unpapered sorrel-colored drafty-looking horses that the owner is calling a Belgian.

From firsthand experience I can tell you that within each group there is a wide variation. Each horse is an indiviudal. Some have a smooth trot to die for and some can bend and collect quite nicely. IMHO most do have a good work ethic, good temperaments, sensible, smart, and all around pleasant to ride.

Sometimes I hear people say “nobody rides belgians” as if it wasn’t practical or sensible. I’d like to point out that long before there were “farm” horses and “riding” horses, people could only afford a few horses so their horses did BOTH jobs. As time went on and American horse culture changed, the idea became that “draft” horses are for pulling harness only and “riding” horses are for saddle only. Only very recenly has the idea of returning farm horses such as Belgians to riding work is catching back on.

Why don’t we see them competing? I don’t claim to have the answer. I do know there is an extreme prejudice against any draft breeds in competitive dressage, bordering on calling it cruelty. To those against riding drafts: have we forgotten the root of dressage is training? Classical dressage isn’t just for a few elite breeds… but that does raise another big issue: the differences between classical vs competitive dressage.

Could Belgians do well in the show ring? Perhaps. But there is so much pressure from trainers and other riders not to “waste your time”. There are judges out there who believe it’s “cruel” or “wrong” to try. Knowing it’s a commitment of thousands of hours and thousands of dollars+ to get up the levels, would you pick a ‘dressage’ breed to stack the deck in your favor… or do you gamble on a ‘weird’ breed?

If someone is on the fence about it, there’s also the headache of finding quality, dressage-show tack that fits a draft. Expect to special order or have items custom made.

So, right now not many people can gamble the time/money to get a draft that far along in the dressage ring. Until more try it, we really don’t know how well the breed in general can do in this discipline.

Reading this thread reminds me of the old saying:
“You can’t teach a pig to sing, it wastes your time and annoys the pig”
I have a belgian t’bred cross and he did great at first level(got my scores for my bronze medal) but why put the old boy through something he obviously finds very tedious. I retired him from his short lived dressage career and he went back to the hunt field and trail riding. And I have another horse more suited to dressage to move up the levels with. (also has some draft blood but much lighter and more uphill) My point is that sure you can train a belgian to do upper level dressage but it won’t be easy and you probably won’t be very competitive in the show ring and it will probably take a lot of work over a long period of time. I look at it like asking a football linebacker to learn upper level ballet. He can get the job done but it won’t be pretty.

[QUOTE=Donella;3348483]

I ride a friesian in dressage. She is built with many of the draft horse issues (even though they arent a draft breed, they have been bred recently to PULL) and believe me, she can pull.

Actually, The Friesian IS a light draft breed originally bred for pulling but has crossed over nicely into dressage.

Nope, he’s working at about 1st level. I am walking/trotting because I’m (sloooowly) coming back from a bad injury and am having tons of probs with my back.

Lewin says I broke my trainer. He’s the most traditional person you’ll ever meet. But, yes, Smokey’s in a pelham because he can tend to get strong, and yes that’s because of his very thick neck.