Technology can great for some things, but in equine enterprises will have it’s limits.
“Stall cams” might be great for monitoring, but does that mean the BO will now just sit in their air conditioned office and not periodically “walk the barn?” Having a real time view of things is Good; not going out until you have to is Bad. Sometimes you hear or smell problems before you see them. To me the jury is “out” on this issue until I see just how this technology will be used to supplement real human beings do things only human beings can do.
Barns are dusty places and that means period lens cleaning or you won’t see jack. And it means period maintenance of connections, too, unless the proper ones are used.
One thing that might be a Good Thing for most folks would be an “aisle cam” that would allow monitoring of common areas. This would help with issues such as “disappearing tack” and “who hit John” when it comes to various disputes.
Regarding lessons, sending a high quality video to a BNT for evaluation could be a Good Thing, but it won’t be free. If the BNT is actually watching the video you’re going to pay them for their time. Maybe they will discount time in front of a screen and maybe they won’t. Or maybe they’ll join lawyers in how they account for their time. That latter item won’t be a good deal for the rider.
Real time lessons will require a substantial capital expenditure for some real time technology and bandwidth. By definition the amount of visual information will be limited by the camera setup. More cameras, more data, more bandwidth. Audio information, often critical in seeing the cause of something “off” is also critical and must be of high quality. Acoustics in most indoor or covered venues is not all that good. In an outdoor they can be terrible. How will the trainer communicate with the student? Headset, PA system, or something else? To get a setup sufficient to justify charging the BNT fee plus the equipment fee will require some money and intelligent setup.
No matter what you’ll still be paying the BNT their hourly rate. They saved the cost of travel and can do more lessons per day but that won’t, necessarily, mean a savings for the rider. Then there’s the issue of the quality of instruction. Being physically present means you can catch not only the obvious but also the lees obvious and “nuances” that are part and parcel of instruction. I’m trying not to be a Luddite on this but I have my doubts as to it’s value.
G.