[QUOTE=bpolli;7142052]
Actually I was wondering the same about Trinity - seemed to really be a Nunn Finer fan! The best thing to do is try any boot and see what works best for your horse. I went on Majyk’s products page and it seemed pretty straightforward.
I do know Boyd Martin actually designed these boots WITH Majyk Equipe - i.e. he isn’t just endorsing them. That’s why he’s wearing them at every event now - Don’t know if he has more info on his site (blog?) but he was at Rolex demonstrating the flexi strike guard thing this year on the Majyk booth.
I guess the bottom line is that there will always be people that prefer the older technology - its a matter of preference. Nice he won in them last weekend though![/QUOTE]
Haha, I am definitely not a rep, nor am I sponsored by Nunn Finer. I have simply done a lot of research on strike guard material and only put Nunn Finer/P.E. on my horses due to the material they’re made from. The PE fronts dont fit all my horses, but I LOVE the coverage of the hinds and the construction of the boot. Most my horses go in PE hinds, Nunn Finer fronts. They ALL show jump in Nunn Finer open fronts because, again, there is no other boot on the market (that I can find) which is an open front with a strike guard with the quality materials. I will admit that I put my fancy shmancy leather/sheepskin boots on my lower level horses for shows, but otherwise, I don’t trust anything leather or plastic (Eskadron style, etc) anymore. I learned the hard way that if your horse is going to clip his front tendons, it’s going to be serious and I want the best protection for that unlikely event.
Also, I foolishly emailed Majyk Equipe without reveiwing their website again. I scoured it in the spring, looking for technology info, but they were pretty bare. Here is bits and pieces from the excellent response from a rep less than 24 hours after inquiring. Apparently, most of this info is on their website:
The video we would like to make would show our proprietary Hyperflex material and how it holds much less water than other boots. We would also demonstrate the ‘rip stop’ function, meaning that, unlike runs in pantyhose, any damages incurred stay localized and don’t continue to rip up the rest of the boot. Last of all, we would show our shaped strike guard (you can see the deconstructed boot on the home page of our site.)
To explain further, if you were to open up many of the leading Cross Country boots today, you would find a piece of plastic similar to what you would find in Home Depot’s plumbing department - i.e. a piece of inflexible PVC. Our strike guard is designed to create a solid wall when hit from behind, but bend like an accordion to fit around the horse’s leg with its natural stride - i.e. the strike guard’s strength is in its construction but it does not stay solid against the horse’s leg when the horse is moving, allowing better flexion without compromising protection.
Our boots were tested in an independent lab that specializes in testing police and riot gear. They chose two other comparable sample boots and tested the amount of impact that passed through each boot by using an anvil brought down on the boot at varying amounts of force. The tests concluded that Majyk’s boots passed through up to 40% less impact than the other two. In layman’s terms that means that the Majyk boot allowed up to 40% less damage to pass through it - the same kind of trauma that passes through the boot to a horse’s leg when it gets hit. The test results can be accessed in full by clicking on the link provided on the page, and shows the methodology and outlines the boots used. These test results were reported and authenticated by a third party lab, not by us.