[QUOTE=shayaalliard;7477199]
They did and do host the adoption events and tell people to adopt- but really isn;t easy to get people to actually go do it. The perception among our customers was always that adopting was too many hoops to jump through.
Our local no kill for example will only adopt to you if you:
1 OWN your home
2 Pass background check
3 Pass credit check
4 Have NEVER been late for a vaccination ever
5 Have NEVER owned an unaltered pet
6 Have NEVER let a cat go outside
They are full always and keep their cats for YEARS without adopting them. VS walk into my place, walk out with your kitten. There was also a certain amount of impulsivity to it- come in to buy cat food, lose your heart to the kitty reaching out to your from the cage. It was a delicate line to walk, between wanting to find them homes, and wanting to make sure those homes were good ones.
It bothers me a little, the comment about the pet store clerk who just came from McDonalds. That job is HARD work for little pay. No one was there because we wanted “a job”- you do it because you love it. You love people and pets and helping them. I dropped out of college for it- it was my chosen career. I had clerks who are now herpetologists, veterinarians, vet techs, microbiologists, human doctors, educators and more. Someone who put profit over what was best for the animals, or who did not truly care, didn’t last long working for me.
We saw the best and worst of people all the time. There were things that I hated, no question. Perhaps the most unethical thing I ever saw was when petland came to town. Petland puppies are trucked in on a semi- and sold by employees who are paid on COMISSION. How can you ensure the best for the pet and the pet parent, when you have to sell sell sell to feed yourself?[/QUOTE]
This is ridiculous (meaning the no-kill shelter adoption requirements); I would not qualify to adopt an animal from them–nor would my parents (who have a rescue cat, they are in their 80’s.) Shame on this organization for having such ridiculously rigid criteria, and for denying legitimate, caring homes to their animals as a result of such a “screening process”; are those animals REALLY going to be happier living out their natural lives at the shelter? What exactly are they thinking? It reminds me of the “scolding old matriarch syndrome”–nothing is ever “up to their impossible standards”, and they somehow believe that this makes them morally superior.
YES, obviously they want to avoid adopting out animals to irresponsible, itinerant, jobless, heedless people–duh!!–but are you kidding me?? :rolleyes: Most of the animals in other countries are “unaltered” (NOT that this is a good thing!)
Bless YOU for doing what you did–and do!
And Petland??? Talk about a wrongheaded and unethical way to “place” animals in new homes. It’s as though they were selling furniture.