[QUOTE=beowulf;8632867]
My key point in 1st post: reputable registry. I don’t know if that is true. I have seen and heard of many TB mares being turned away from OHBS/GOV/AHS due to crooked front legs and over at the knee conformation. Which the first mare has and is probably why she sustained the over-at-the-knee look. AHS wouldn’t approve her with the over-at-the-knee quality either. As far as the second mare… She has so many conformation faults for breeding that I’m not sure she would even get a passing glance from any of the reputable registries. I’ve seen nicer horses get turned away, so again, I am not sure if you are correct.[/QUOTE]
Hmm. I have been attending breed inspections since the late 80’s. I have seen multiple inspections for Oldenburg, KWPN, AHS, ISR/ONA, RPSI, and a few for Westphalians and Holsteiners. I have organized our area’s Oldenburg (OHBS/GOV) inspection for the past 16 years. And I have seen many TBs with leg faults approved - although AHS has been the strictest about them. (FWIW, I have also seen many WB mares with leg faults approved, by all those registries.) Also, as I said, KWPN doesn’t even require inspection for TB mares - they would register the offspring of BOTH those mares without ever seeing the mares. Are they not a “reputable registry”?