The anti-slaughter issue came to birth on the 53rd page … somewhere in the 1050’s posts---- Steph Beattie sold a horse to DD to run when it was injured only months before.
SB couldnt account for many horses. SB;s horses found and saved in slaughter pens… its all there, oh and… I didnt notice anyone else coming under fire… they all had contracts and answers.
As was pointed out .... it then unravels further.........
when the Pa Equestrian posted her front page declaration of providing bright futures for racehorses, she herself unearthed most of this controversy.
The RACE fund rebuttal then sent it all in a new direction by showing that there WAS other recouse to be taken in placing horses ----in place for years-- yet, SB chose slaughter.
the whys? the what fors? the unanswered questions (the lies)_then sparked the flames even more ...
Maybe the message is one of a moral- ethical one ...
rather than humanely dispose of unproductive business property… torture was chosen.
Hard to accept that any type of horse welfare would be beneficial based on SB’s thinking .