[QUOTE=meupatdoes;6690228]
I personally hate them from a design for the horse perspective.
The panels are extremely small and narrow and thus concentrate the rider’s weight on the smallest possible area.
Additionally the twist is made as narrow as possible which at some point is just too narrow for the back of the horse and the stirrup bars dig in. If the rider wants their legs X inches apart max but horse is X+Y inches wide, just plopping a really narrow twist (and thus, tree) on top is just mathematically incompatible. Sure you can blow out the very front of the gullet and call it “wide” but if the stirrup bars five inches back can only be X inches apart or the rider will b*tch then you have yourself a problem. The Butet caters to exactly this narrow twist obssession with a total disregard to how that works out for the horse.
Basically it is a design that gives very little regard to the comfort of the horse and you can buy a completely custom built brandy spanky new saddle for less than the cost of a used Butet.[/QUOTE]
Your opinion is quite clear. I do take issue with your statement of…“with a total disregard to how that works out for the horse.” Your generalized statement is not true. Personally, I have always had my horses interest as the number one priority. In the time I have had my saddle I have owned eight horses. None had any issue with my saddle. One was the A/O hunter Champion of the country in the past and qualified for all the indoors and Devon while I rode him, another won the A/A Hunter Classic at Lake Placid, another won the majority of the equitation classes I entered. My point is if the saddle was as wretched as described above I do not believe the horses would have been able to perform well.
Please do not cast such a wide net implying because you ride in a Butet you have a total disregard to how it works out for the horse.