[QUOTE=Tom King;8217716]
Co-ownership is for the breeder’s protection. The breeder’s kennel name is on the puppy. By retaining co-ownership, the breeder has to sign for litter registration, so still has some say-so about who he can be bred to, and in what direction that branch of pedigrees can go with the kennel name.
We sell VERY few. Those only to people we have known for a good while. Our kennel name will never be found on a backyard or puppy mill pedigree.
For full registration, we not only keep co-ownership, but also a breeding or puppy back. It’s common at the top of our breed.
We have never taken a puppy back for breeding to one of our males. We don’t require co-ownership for a stud breeding, but we only breed to females we like, owned by other breeders that we know share our care and philosophy about the breed. 2k up front. Breeding back if less than 2 puppies in the litter.[/QUOTE]
Hey, I agree with everything you’ve said, with this exception:
Generally I would agree to another breeding if there were no puppies or a singleton, with no fee, except if it was a dead frozen dog.
I have known lots of other breeders who, if the breeding was to a deceased male, they would charge the whole stud fee at the time the semen is shipped.
In theory, I agree with this. There is no more of this dog’s semen.
However, I must admit, in the case of someone who used my dog many years ago with great results, and who wanted to use frozen semen from this dog, I could not find it in my heart to charge her other than semen shipping charges.
She was in Canada, so more of a bother, semen arrived in great shape, but I knew all the costs incurred with all the progesterone/LH testing, the cost of surgical insemination, shipping the semen, etc. so I did not charge a stud fee for this particular person.
But, in general, I do think it is not unfair to charge the full stud service amount for a dead frozen dog.