Contact and self carriage discussion please

So, I have been pondering and researching and experimenting with those concept and would really like some more opinions, experiences, input.

Why do we call “contact” in dressage when reins are tight - ie, no slack. Is contact not the connection between horse and rider when the horse responds to the rider immediately and obediently? Certainly, a horse can respond while there is slack in the reins?! Reining horses do, old dressage horses are depicted that way, why is that not desired now?

Now, on to self carriage. If the horse is in true self carriage, why do I need to hold up 6, 10, 1 lbs in my hands to “keep the horse balanced”? Isn’t the idea the horse is in “Self Carriage”?

Please do make references to reading materials or other resources if you think they may be helpful.

You don’t. IMHO, Riding without ‘contact’ starts at third level when you do the inside rein release at canter, then the release of both reins in canter. The point is that most horses aren’t so highly trained to stay there indefinitely with no rider input- so after a period of testing the carriage, you go back to a following contact, then back to true self carriage again. It’s a process, both getting there, and then working to maintain, not a black or white kind of thing. If you watch lots of upper level horses doing piaffe, they will work it in true self carriage, where the rider can drop the reins entirely and the horse will remain in his work. And the horse is not out of self carriage just because the rider has contact. Contact can be, and often is, passive- just lightly following- not restricting, or changing anything.

We need contact because it lets us teach the horse to seek out the carriage we desire, and without contact the rider can’t react as quickly to correct the horse because the hands aren’t truly following.

If you can achieve everything with slack reins, well, good for you, and I admire you:D However, you will find that it is extremely difficult to achieve. Besides, contact does not mean tight rein. There should still be a very slight slack on the reins. It is different from reining horses though. Reinning horses generally wear very long shank which enables the riders to use very slack reins while deliver very strong message.

And no, if you have to hold your horse up, he does not have self carriage. A horse with self carriage will continue with the same tempo and frame when you drop the reins. If anything (tempo, rhythm, speed, etc) changes before and after you drop the reins, that horse does not have self carriage.

Methinks true contact involves so much more than the hands and pounds exerted. Simply, we need to balance our selves before we can balance the horse. For example, if we think of a halfhalt as a rebalancing of ourselves (from our shoulders and seat), our horse is then able to rebalance itself. Balancing occurs through contact of our seat, legs and hands. IMO, hands are there not to hold up the horse, but are to guide and control energy created from our seat connecting with the horse’s energy center. We restrain the energy, we feed out the energy as needed, but we don’t ever take the energy away from the horse. A horse ridden and trained this way will be soft, self-carrying, responsive and freely moving.

The presence of a shank does not imply a “very strong message” any more than the curb on a double bridle does. In fact, the shank on the western curb allows the rider to use a very subtle message to the horse.

Self carriage comes from the horse. A horse prancing across the pasture playing, is in self carriage.

Contact is a light elastic thing, it should not involve pounds and pounds of weight. If it does, the horse is either not strong enough, balanced enough or forward enough for whatever the rider is asking. The combination of the two is an ongoing continuous progression. The self carriage and collection, asked for at 2nd level is not as high as the level at 3rd and 4th. The weight of the contact should not change no matter what level.

A test of self carriage is the momentary giving of the reins.

While reading about it can help, it is best discovered with help from the ground. I would recommend a subscription to Dressage Today, and Dressage Connections, both publications have articles that touch on the subject. However, it has been my observation that the comcepts aren’t understood until you can do them. :wink:

[QUOTE=monstrpony;4199567]
The presence of a shank does not imply a “very strong message” any more than the curb on a double bridle does. In fact, the shank on the western curb allows the rider to use a very subtle message to the horse.[/QUOTE]

I think you are equating the subtley of the riders’ aids with the force of messages delivered, which are two different things. A shank is a leverage device and any leverage devices allow riders to use very subtle reins aids while delivering much stronger messages.

A friend and I were talking about something related just yesterday. The stretch trot at Training Level… the idea there is that when you let the reins out the horse reaches for the bit. I think the horse should still stay round and stretch for the bit. That is what I am comfortable with my big mare doing at least- otherwise she would fall on the forehand.

In my opinion self carriage should have the horse be light in your hands… That being said the movements in the training level test contradict the idea of self carriage. The concept of the uberstrichen (give the reins for a second and the horse stays there) = self carriage. This does not mean completely given the reins away the entire time, some contact is of course needed it should just be light, not holding the horses head in place. Conrad Schumacher is a great source to google on self carriage.

Self carriage does not be ‘light in the hand’. It means ‘the horse is not relying on the reins for balance’. He can give the rider the feeling he is putting a rather surprising amount of pressure on the rider and still not be relying on them for balance.

Why do we call “contact” in dressage when reins are tight - ie, no slack.

I have never heard ANYONE say ‘contact is when the reins are tight’.

Is contact not the connection between horse and rider when the horse responds to the rider immediately and obediently?

[I]No. Contact is ONLY one simple thing with a very simple definition. When you have the slack out of the reins, that is all it means. A CONNECTION is when the contact is consistently maintained thru correct riding, with the horse at least to some degree in balance and under control.

Self carriage has nothing at all to do with the reins being loose, slack or anything else even remotely like that! I think your confusion and questions all arise out of the basic misconception that ‘self carriage means a loop in the reins’ - it does not. [/I]

Certainly, a horse can respond while there is slack in the reins?! Reining horses do, old dressage horses are depicted that way, why is that not desired now?

[I]Dressage has one fundamental concept at the basis of it - that the art of it is by doing things in a traditional, classical way, NOT by finding an easy, pleasurable way to do things that avoids difficulty. It is far, far harder to train horse and rider to work with a contact, a connection.

“Old dressage horses”? LOL. The rider would release the reins during the moment of the photograph, my dear. It was kind of a trick(like holding the hands on the stomach)…but with the better trainers, having a real basis - momentary release of the reins ‘asks a question’, which is ‘are you relying on the reins for balance’? and when that question is answered, the rider goes back to his work, establishing connection, half halt, balance, developing impulsion. Look at the 70 year old movies of the Spanish Riding School riders schooling their horses. Releasing the reins is indeed a part of training, but a momentary part.

Impulsion is developed through half halts. Half halts develop from rudimentary to very subtle, but the aids are all the aids, all the time, sure, over time the rider’s reins become used in a more and more subtle way, but note even the Spanish RIding school does not ride or train without a bridle. All the aids, all the time. Ride the whole horse, not just the back end and not just the front end.
[/I]

Now, on to self carriage. If the horse is in true self carriage, why do I need to hold up 6, 10, 1 lbs in my hands to “keep the horse balanced”? Isn’t the idea the horse is in “Self Carriage”?

You’re confusing loose reins with self carriage. The two couldn’t be more different.

Please do make references to reading materials or other resources if you think they may be helpful.

[I]A rider has as much ‘pounds’ in his hands as he needs to at that moment, no more, no less.

Horses learn to swing their backs, reach for the bit (even when in a more advanced posture) and to always ‘push their impulsion to the bit’ as time goes on, and the ‘pounds’ become much more, and then again, as training progresses, lighter. Because the horse’s hind quarters and back gradually increase in strength and power and straightness.

The horse learns to make a resilient connection with the reins and hence the rider’s hands so that they can become as one. They will have many, many less than perfect moments on the journey to that goal - and most horses and riders will work only and training and first level, and may not progress beyond a rudimentary degree of training.

Without the circle of the aids, half halts, contact and connection, true impulsion, no one ever will progress in dressage, and no one ever has.

The hardest thing is to learn to use all the aids together, in a coordinated balanced way - too little rein as bad as too much.

Von Ziegner, Elements of Dressage.

“There is no communication without contact”

“Maintaining this permanent gentle connection, the rider will give his horse the chance to start the first communication” (p 42)

“The more consistently the horse travels on one track, the more the rider will feel the thrust of the hind feet in his hands. In other words, the better the straightness, the better the contact” (p 43)

Steinbrecht, The Gymnasium of the Horse.

“Contact is correct, no matter to which degree the individual horse takes it, depending on his training, as long as the horse reacts or responds to the action of the hand” (p 23)

“…the trainer must know how to use these different hand actions (referring to earlier discussion of light, soft, and firm contact)…He must be able to keep the hesitant horse moving with a light hand, use his firm hand to get the horse that leans on the bit or pushes forward too much to settle down, and in between, use his soft hand to invite his horse to take on a quiet and uniform contact”. (p 23)
[/I]

True self carriage come when the horses hind leg comes underneath itself enough so that the horse can lift and carry it’s shoulders.

As stated earlier, if horse is heavy (leaning) on reins they are NOT in self carriage. There are many reasons why they may not be, but making sure the horse is “in front of your leg”, meaning can at any moment do a walk/canter or canter/walk without trot steps (or or trot/halt transition without any walk steps) and without “stabbing” the ground and/or falling on it’s nose, is the first step in self carriage.

When in self carriage the rein contact is there - not too light, not too heavy. They key here is the horse is aware of and reacts to subtle directions from the seat and/or the reins. The nose can not be nehind the vertical (too light rein contact is one symptom) as this is an evasion. It can be in front of the vertical IF the horse is using their back.

Only when the horse is actively using their hind legs and their back are they going correctly in dressage and can then be asked to carry themselves.

If at all possible see if you can go with your trainer to watch a third level horse - then compare the horses movement in warm up to their movement post warmup. In my mare you can see her LIFT her shoulders once she carry’s herself, and the rider can feel the rein contact lighten (as long as she’s straight then contact in both reins is light, consistent and even). Even someone who is not a dressage rider can see the difference in self carriage in my mare from pre to post warm-up. It amazes even me. :smiley:

I still think that these days horses are ridden with too much contact, even in the upper levels and are not really in true self carriage.

I think ‘these days’ are no different from any past days.

[QUOTE=slc2;4201914]
I think ‘these days’ are no different from any past days.[/QUOTE]
Except that “these days” the riders are less educated:lol: contact is probably the same, but judging by what i see at shows consistency is not.

I don’t agree with you. There are just as many people beating their chests about ‘the good old days’ when everyone rode so well. I have news for you. I was there in ‘the good old days’, and there was more crappy riding then than now, at all levels. And during THOSE good old days, people were beating their chests about the ‘good old days’, and the good old days, no matter what people you are talking to, were always 20 years before whenever. If you go back to books published in 1920, the good old days were 1899, and if you go back to books published in 1600, the good old days were in 1580, and so on.

There are many people new to dressage, but the same percentage that think you can learn dressage from a book, a video or the magical, mystical blowhard who has never trained even one single horse and is selling those videos, self carriage means throwing the reins at the horse’s head, bending means teaching the horse a trick to put his nose on your knee with the rein hanging down, you should never use your leg or reins, if you ever have to put forth any effort that’s bad, all problems are caused by ailments, saddles and lack of chiropractic and supplements rather than riding or training, impulsion and self carriage are things you see when the horse is prancing around his paddock, on the bit means getting your horse to hold his head still, collection is some kind of mysterious, ethereal inexplicable thing for the cognoscenti and involves breathing through your kundalini, extensions should look like a field hunter trotting across a field with the neck horizontal, dressage flying lead changes can be taught by running the horse at a wall, and piaffe is sort of a trick you can teach if you know what magic chi points on the horse to touch with a whip.

Hm, you may have a point there.
i’ve been at this 30 years now, but a a few of those years were before puberty, and :lol: thusly naive years… so let’s make it an even 20 for ease of conversing.
The old wobblies I know are from the 40’s-60’s and they’ve got so much good info in their brains if they turn too quickly some falls out. Maybe what this means is that yes, crappy riders have existed throughout the ages, but the ones that stick around to teach us about the “good ol days” are the ones that rode correctly.
maybe that’s where my impression is coming from. come to think of it, i dont think i’ve ever seen photos of lower level competitions from before my time. I think in order to really form an opinion, i’d need to find a bunch of photos from “the good ol days”

You know what I think? That there aren’t any ‘good old days’.

Every period of dressage in this country has its problems, strengths, weaknesses, at all levels…ALL. Our FEI riders have come a long, long, long, LONG way in even just 15 years, and their knowledge and experience is the main way WE get better knowledge and better instruction.

Looking carefully at some old movies of the ‘very good old days’ (20’s, 30’s, 40’s, 50’s, 60’s, 70’s, whatever good old days you want), and those ‘great riders’, they made mistakes and they had problems - look at pics of early Olympics, the only way you can convince yourself people rode so much better then is by completely discarding your eyeballs, and never using them again. Look at old films of our cavalry riders, our eventers…things change, knowledge accumulates.

It’s very, very important to see what you see, and not filter it through too thick an emotional, agenda-ridden lens.

Getting a bookload of pictures of Decarpentry riding piaffe and passage was one of the better things I ever did for myself, LOL. There were good things about those times, there were bad. Just because something is old doesn’t make it so great, neither does it being new…except that there isn’t anything new…LOL!

As a whole, people in this country were no better educated in dressage 20 years ago, or 30 years ago. In fact, I would say they were far, far behind what they are today, both in riding skills and in education. And there are always - ALWAYS only a few really incredibly gifted, exceptional people in dressage, in any generation.

[QUOTE=slc2;4202463]
And there are always - ALWAYS only a few really incredibly gifted, exceptional people in dressage, in any generation.[/QUOTE]
Why do you think that is? I definitely see the same thing. I personally wonder why if we are evolving as a community, why our handful of elites doesnt ever get much bigger…

By definition, having ‘alot of elites’ is impossible. :lol::lol::lol:

If we did, they wouldn’t be elites any more.

Elites are elites because they are exceptional in all ways - emotional, physical, circumstance-wise, everything.

The reason for the rapid narrowing upward of that pyramind is, I think, that there are always many, many people that dabble, that have fun, that do it on again off again.

There is a very big leap from that to doing something more seriously. Then every step up the ladder, from schooling to local shows, from local to regional, from regional to national, from national to small tour international, even from small tour to the top I think there are STILL many steps.

So there is that committment first of all and that desire to do it.

For many people they just get sick of the travel, the pressure, the loneliness (someone once said at the top, you are always alone, in all ways; I don’t think it’s THAT dramatic but I do think it’s a tough place to be in, the top 10 in the world in anything).

Then, I just think there are a few aspects a person can improve in themselves, and some that they can only improve so much, and some that are just not going to allow them to get to the very top.

I think the ability to get people to help one is another thing; some people simply aren’t that appealing or charming. Some people, others just want to see them succeed.

Acting with class, honesty and integrity constantly with all customers is just not in the cards for a lot of people. They may ride well, but they won’t get the top horses.

The ability to tolerate a series of overlapping beaurocracies is another thing. Some people ride very well but they just can’t stand all the crap that goes on. I think one has to have the sort of temperament that can have such an incredible singleness of purpose that no matter what happens, they will keep going.

[QUOTE=mzm farm;4199366]
So, I have been pondering and researching and experimenting with those concept and would really like some more opinions, experiences, input.

Why do we call “contact” in dressage when reins are tight - ie, no slack. Is contact not the connection between horse and rider when the horse responds to the rider immediately and obediently? Certainly, a horse can respond while there is slack in the reins?! Reining horses do, old dressage horses are depicted that way, why is that not desired now?

Now, on to self carriage. If the horse is in true self carriage, why do I need to hold up 6, 10, 1 lbs in my hands to “keep the horse balanced”? Isn’t the idea the horse is in “Self Carriage”?

Please do make references to reading materials or other resources if you think they may be helpful.[/QUOTE]

i think the term “contact” is bad translation of a german word - i think the translation should be “connection” (i am too lazy and too hurt to get up and source this - i will later today)… in any case - as i understand it:

1)heavy contact = pulling - not correct contact/connection

2)a horse in self carriage has learned to carry itself and its (balanced) rider without the added support of the rider. the horse should go with just the weight of the reins being ridden off the seat.

this is hard work and requires training for the most part. so a training level horse isnt expected to be in self carriage -

if a horse cant go in some degree self carriage by the time it reaches 2nd there is a problem. and if a horse reaches FEI and cant go in self carriage there is a huge problem .

yes, there are times when the horse might seek the support of the hand, but it should grow less and less as training goes by.

and, from personal experience on many horses i can tell you that self carriage and riding off the seat is heaven on earth.

and as my trainer says : when the horse is in self carriage my job is done - at that point in time i need to allow my horse to carry herself with little or no aids. this is her reward. :slight_smile: its my reward too - it is what keeps me coming back as it i the best feeling out there :")

interesting research in vet journal…

If you have access to a college library and are interested in what science has to say, I found these interesting…

Peham, C., et al. A comparison of forces acting on the horse’s back and the stability of the rider’s seat in different positions at the trot. The Veterinary Journal (2009), doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.04.007

von Peinen K, Wiestner T, Bogisch S, Roepstorff L, van Weeren PR, Weishaupt MA. Relationship between the forces acting on the horse’s back and the movements of rider and horse while walking on a treadmill. Equine Vet J. 2009 Mar;41(3):285-91.

Weishaupt MA, Wiestner T, von Peinen K, Waldern N, Roepstorff L, van Weeren R, Meyer H, Johnston C. Effect of head and neck position on vertical ground reaction forces and interlimb coordination in the dressage horse ridden at walk and trot on a treadmill. Equine Vet J Suppl. 2006 Aug;(36):387-92.

REgards,
Medical Mike
equestrian medical researcher
www.fitfocusedforward.us