@trubandloki
But in that case, wouldn’t the police have clamped down on MB more?
I don’t think we necessarily need overt interference to explain police being fairly hands-off in what looks like a tenancy dispute between two upper middle class people without known weapons and with the resources to engage lawyers to sort it out.
I will say as well that once 911 gets repeated competing escalating calls about interpersonal disputes or minor things, they do kind of back off and treat the parties like doctors treat folks they have written off as hypochondriacs.
If the parties lived in a trailer park or were POC there is a much higher chance that they would have been arrested on some pretext, especially if they displayed violent tendencies in front of the police.
It’s one of the aspects of privilege that if you are well-presenting white upper middle class, and on private property, the police are much less trigger happy/ handcuff happy, and much more likely to leave you to sort it out in the courts. They are assuming (wrongly in this case) that things are unlikely to proceed to actual violence.
I am going to guess police had no idea MB had access to a gun, and may have felt reassured that there were no other guns on the property (whether this is true or not).
I think that any police officer or indeed reasonable person would expect that if the well off tenant felt in danger they would leave ASAP, and if the property owner felt in danger they would start a protection order and eviction process ASAP. When both parties stay put, dont take appropriate civil legal action that’s within their means, and keep calling 911 to get involved in an interpersonal dispute I do think that police flag them as time wasters.
Of course, with people deemed hypochondriacs, sometimes the patient actually develops a fatal illness that gets missed because the doctor doesn’t take them seriously.
Which is the equivalent here. Nobody expected anyone would get shot, especially the victim.