[QUOTE=cloudyandcallie;8661696]
Ticked off again, part 2: It really irritates me that people jump on someone who cares about an animal who may be suffering or dying. It is not being a busy body to use binoculars or to watch a neighbor’s animal which appears in distress. People act as though it is OK to let an animal suffer as long as it is not your animal. [/QUOTE]
I don’t think that’s what is happening on this thread.
The issue that got the COTHers up in arms (in my opinion) was that the OP was watching through binoculars but had not (apparently) spoken to the neighbor directly. As if hoping to prove neglect rather than prevent it.
However, it is my understanding that she did call the sheriff, and they did visit the farm. So, maybe that is law enforcement working properly?
But…it can be frustrating. I had terribly neglectful, pony hoarding neighbors, but when I called AC on them, they did not think that the case warranted legal intervention, no matter how sad. However, there is a line between “legally right” and “ethically right.” This situation was not ethically right, but apparently did not have enough teeth for AC to press charges. (e.g. no dead animals on the property.)
Maybe the OP’s neighbor has crossed that line (as my neighbor did) but watching through binoculars trying to catch criminal activity, especially after the AC/LE has visited and not taken action, is a bit obsessive. I can understand it - because I have lived it, too. I spent many angry and frustrated evenings trying to figure out how to make it different. But, unfortunately, it doesn’t always work the way we want it to work. And that really sucks when you have to watch it.
So, I don’t mean to jump on the OP, because it is possible that the animal IS being neglected, at least by the OP’s standard of care. And, having a higher standard of care than “bare minimum” is not a bad thing.