[QUOTE=cryptoaero;7897036]
JB- What is your name? [/QUOTE]
My real name is irrelevant, because all it would do is put you down a path of “you aren’t even a vet/Dr/scientist therefore nothing you say holds any water”, and rankly, that argument gets old. One does not have to be any of those things to know when “proof” is just someone opinion posted on a blog without any scientific cites. One does not have to be any of those things to go find peer-reviewed studies and valid research articles to understand to at least some basic degree that, for example, horses created the very same proprionic acid that you clearly state causes ulcerative colitis, nor to find the valid information and know from firsthand experiences that NSAIDs can cause ulcerative colitis anywhere in the world, not just the US.
Why do you ignore the factual information that has proven some of your statements wrong? Do YOU not want to be educated?
On the GMO point - I suspect Cyrpto only counts Monsanto’s Roundup-ready products to fall into the GMO category. It’s not difficult to make a feed product that doesn’t contain any of that, so that’s not a huge deal. Not all corn or alfalfa is GMO. There aren’t any GMO oats. I don’t think there is any GMO Timothy. There is currently no GMO wheat approved for us in the US (though we know it has escaped into “clean” cultivated fields ) Yes, it’s great to be able to claim GMO-free status, but it’s not rocket science to be able to do that.
And are you saying that the FDA is not posting the truth?
I never said that at all. I never debated the issue of recalls.
Beau in the Testimonials certainly is quite fat. Hopefully it’s just a matter of his owners feeding him too much, and not the high sugar feed making him on the verge of becoming laminitic. He sure does look to have some unhealthy fat deposits in scary places
One of the testimonials called this a “complete grain” and it’s no such thing. See why one should never look at testimonials as anything but opinions, possibly filled with either wrong information, or leaving out important pieces of information? If the owner of a show jumping barn (I’m assuming that’s what his by-line means) doesn’t actually know what he’s feeding, why should we be all ga-ga over the Peters feeding this? Many top names feed X feed and rave about it, but that doesn’t mean they actually understand what’s in the feed.
And no- I am not subject to recalls as I would never use a feed mill that uses any chemicals that can harm any species of animals.
Why do you think recalls are only about chemicals? Any of your components could be contaminated before they even get to you, your oats could mold, I’m sure the cabbage could be bad as well. All of those things would necessitate a recall if that batch were to be distributed. Hopefully you aren’t so naive in thinking that only chemicals directly in your or “your” mill are the only potential problem, and therefore don’t do any quality control testing on every batch that you make.
Let me make it clear, since a couple seem to have an issue with what’s really not an issue: I, and apparently others, do not think this is a BAD feed. It’s not going to harm most horses. I like the ingredients in it as a whole. I’m quite sure many horses do well on it.
However, it is absolutely not appropriate for all horses, especially IR horses. There are many other feeds that are just as good AND better (because they are actually fortified). The same can be said for quite a few other feeds, from the “not appropriate for all horses but work well for some”, to “not a fortified feed no matter how many times one says it” like Thrive.
Other than some little nit-picky details like that pesky 28% NSC level (which really is the only reason I’d never use it), I don’t have a problem with this feed at all. I don’t think anyone does. The problem is solely in the how and why being put forth by the owner and the testimonials.