What I think is that rollkur riders are trying to hide behind the Deep Method and call it a “variation of rollkur”. I’m quite surprised that the Deep Method riders are not defending their method, since Deep Method will get a bad name as well if it will be associated with rollkur. But I can see how it’s beneficial to rollkur to mud the waters and lump rollkur and Deep Method together. Who would argue with suppling the horse and with bringing its back up for a more swing and relaxation?
Who would argue with “truisms”? But the problem is that you can try to wrap the rollkur in the shiny wrapper and try to present it with a truism phrases that is it good for the horse = but not everybody will buy it. On the contrary, I think horse people are smart enough to see thru it. They will question why rollkur can’t stand on its own? Why rollkur needs to be lumped together with the Deep Method? To soften the presentation and visual impact?
But if some people say that rollkur and “Slightly Behind the Vertical” is the same thing = it’s just laughable. Since “Slightly Behind the Vertical” is not a training method, but a head carriage or evasion.
Same as Deep Method is not equal of a horse who is braking in the 3rd vertebra. One is a training method and another on is evasion and a fault.