It depends on how the parcels were divided. Buildable lots will have easements for septic and/or water (water needs a minimum of 1 gal/min), if they have none on the property, or it won’t perc. If not, it would be considered as only suitable for ag. not living. No way to get around that with Marin Planning. Consequently, one would have to see the deed for the property, to see what it’s designed for. If it is stuck as only ag, it would go for bottom dollar pricing.
Joanne,
I found this thread - I haven’t read it all yet, but she got the mare.
http://www.horseforum.com/horse-breeding/sequel-x-redwine-foaling-thread-116446/
[QUOTE=Tommy’s Girl;6790563]
Joanne,
I found this thread - I haven’t read it all yet, but she got the mare.
http://www.horseforum.com/horse-breeding/sequel-x-redwine-foaling-thread-116446/[/QUOTE]
Seems like that idiot doesn’t know how to feed her mares or foals either. Came across another thread full of pics with skinny mares and she weaned her foals at 2-3 months of age. Babies look terrible. This is the Redwine post weaning.
http://www.horseforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=119537&stc=1&d=1353890842
http://www.horseforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=119499&stc=1&d=1353890073
The pictures look terrible. Could that foal (Rhapsody) have been sold back to Jill and be the foal Jill used in her article? Can’t find it, but the one where she bought a terrible looking foal, and then showed a picture of it after Jill had it for a while.
[QUOTE=COTHalter44;6790586]
Seems like that idiot doesn’t know how to feed her mares or foals either. Came across another thread full of pics with skinny mares and she weaned her foals at 2-3 months of age. Babies look terrible. This is the Redwine post weaning.
http://www.horseforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=119537&stc=1&d=1353890842
http://www.horseforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=119499&stc=1&d=1353890073[/QUOTE]
Good lord. I couldn’t bear looking at that poor ribby mare… And the foal… Pitiful.
Sad photos. Who has the horses now?
[QUOTE=SanJacMonument;6790681]
Sad photos. Who has the horses now?[/QUOTE]
Found this:
http://shamrockhollowwarmbloods.weebly.com/contact-info.html
:disillusionment:
[QUOTE=Lulu;6790713]
Found this:
http://shamrockhollowwarmbloods.weebly.com/contact-info.html[/QUOTE]
and found this:
I’m confused…
Some of those photos are actually rather shocking. Breeding for a lack of substance. Definately the first time I have seen such well bred weak conformation.
I’m confused…
:lol:
Let’s not drag someone else through the mud. Sounds like this girl dealt with a “Burnell” episode and was one of the lucky ones to get her horse. There’s no need to come down on her now. The mare is ribby but otherwise looks well taken care of.
[QUOTE=Callmeacab;6790515]
It depends on how the parcels were divided. Buildable lots will have easements for septic and/or water (water needs a minimum of 1 gal/min), if they have none on the property, or it won’t perc. If not, it would be considered as only suitable for ag. not living. No way to get around that with Marin Planning. Consequently, one would have to see the deed for the property, to see what it’s designed for. If it is stuck as only ag, it would go for bottom dollar pricing.[/QUOTE]
A “perc test” is not about water availability - it is about how the soil drains for septic…
the area where JB is has loads of water… which in itself might be why it wont “perc” if that is the case…
[QUOTE=mbm;6790788]
A “perc test” is not about water availability - it is about how the soil drains for septic…
the area where JB is has loads of water… which in itself might be why it wont “perc” if that is the case…[/QUOTE]
You misunderstood my post. I was referring to two separate building requirements. Suitable water and suitable soil that will perc are two totally different things. Both are requirements for getting land approved to build on.
[QUOTE=Daventry;6788738]
I went ahead and asked that, as I know myself and a lot of people are confused. The farm photos are part of a public record with the Marin County Community development violations. This is totally separate from the seized horses that were taken by the Marin Humane Society. The vet and farrier declarations are part of the Writ of Mandate Ms. Weems filed. So, one part is action taken by the County itself regarding what was happening on the land, one part is the Writ of Mandate filed by Ms. Weems and the other part is dealing with the horses by Marin Humane Society. The County violations records are public record, the Writ of Mandate is public record, but the Marin Humane Society actions…not so much. 
That is why no further photos of the horses have been released.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for clearing that up 
OK, out of curiosity - does anyone know if lawyer Weems has a farm?
[QUOTE=DownYonder;6791116]
OK, out of curiosity - does anyone know if lawyer Weems has a farm?[/QUOTE]
Seems that she’s a breeder and actively competes so I would guess that she does… I am still digging…
What difference does it make if she does or she doesn’t?
I would like to encourage anyone who has been a victim of this situation to start organizing their physical evidence (paperwork), if they have any, and themselves, and look into organizing some evidence for the appropriate State’s or US Attorneys.
http://ponytaleswebsite.com/violations_USEF.html
And continue to get the word out on FB and other communication resources.
