I don’t really understand this sentiment–maybe it’s because I train a competition dog. I expect him to obey every one of my commands as soon as I give them. He does not mouth, he does not jump, and if he is off leash, he does not move his shoulder even six inches away from my left leg.
I had been told over and over when I got a horse that training him wasn’t going to be anything like training a dog and I’ve actually found the two to be pretty much the same as far as groundwork goes: You do what I ask, when I ask it, inappropriate behaviors are punished and appropriate ones rewarded. I have zero tolerance for dangerous behaviors in a horse just like I have zero tolerance when my dog lunges at the end of the leash, tries to run away from me, or jumps up on strangers (or anyone, for that matter).
So far my horse knows a bunch of tricks, no longer tries to run me over on the lunge line (though the fact that I have stopped fearing his behavior probably doesn’t hurt this), and generally is well behaved on the ground, though this was true before I got him.
I’ve actually had one person ask me at my barn, “Did you teach him all that yourself?” while asking him to back up, half pass, spin around his feet, etc, from the ground.
I won’t pretend to know anything about teaching horses to be ridden, I’ll be paying someone else to do that.
My point is that having my first horse and teaching him to do stuff really doesn’t seem any different than training I have done with dogs. The motivators are different, as are the animal’s responses, but is there something about horses/dogs that most people do that I’m not? Tolerance for bullshit perhaps?
What are your insights?