This post right here….so scribbler is more in the know than first stated! Thank you so very much for this. Exactly what was needed. Thank you thank you
I did not foresee the depths of the issues when I started this thread. K was complaining loudly on her public professional FB page about clients cancelling on her. So it’s interesting to hear from the clients’ side.
There was also an article online about K that said something to the effect of “Attorney makes extra cash braiding horses” at some big show. So you can’t believe everything you see online. I only found this after K posted insisting her life was an open book and everything about her is online. Actually, there isn’t much. As there isn’t for most people not in media or entertainment.
Scribbler we know you are bringing things up from almost a decade ago only to incite the current thread. That’s fine. But you let yourself skip there with the British terminology
Thank you everyone for your time and comments. I got what I needed here. You all have a lovely holidays and keep on riding and typing away! Happy new years!
If you actually read the posts upthread, you will see that people disagreed with Scribbler, myself specifically, regarding DHH allegedly not being part of KWPN or being misrepresented as a Dutch WB. I refuted that said the DHH can absolutely be part of KWPN and, therefore, a Dutch WB. I also said I thought you were breeding nice jumper lines that were not DHH in origin, and therefore were not misrepresenting the DHH as jumping lines, and that the DHH by itself holds a lot of merit.
The thread then became quite positive with several posters contributing their experiences and successes with the DHH.
It wasn’t until you recently showed up, made vague legal threats, stated a detective was monitoring the threads (sorry to say that is highly improbable), started dishing underhanded insults, and apparently contacted people to start drama that have nothing to do with this that the thread derailed and became a circus.
I understand wanting to set certain records straight but you are being ridiculous and only proving the original post to be accurate with your behavior.
What an utter embarrassment this thread has become.
I just would like to take this moment to remind everyone that they can mute this thread and never get notifications/see it again. Something I will be doing presently, and would politely suggest others do as well.
Yes. I didn’t comment on the DHH posts because I don’t know the breed, and was happy to be corrected that they can be useful for jumper lines. I thought that was going to be the end of it until K appeared.
I’d argue much more successful and prevalent in dressage lines versus jumper but still - not everyone just piled on and did with Kasheare is stating. On their FB, it appears she is breeding nice KWPN jumper lines (without DHH lines) so I felt she was not misrepresenting DHH as Dutch WB jumpers (not sure how clear I was in my previous posts when I was trying to say this). I guess none of that really matters though. I don’t think I’d do business with this person just based on the responses in this post, which is really unfortunate for someone who appears to be breeding nice lines with good results.
Yes it looks like her breeding program has changed from the first thread about her. Since she is using AI and donor mares and recipient mares her breeding is potentially more flexible than if she was invested in brood mares and a stud.
I have to say it was more the FB drama than the horses that prompted me to start a thread.
It’s useful to vet breeders/ sellers as well as the actual horses.
Anyway, to get back to the point—here are a few more photos & a video of my orange gentleman from the last week or so. The indoor was busy today so he got to show off his knee action as he spooked mid leg yield at the leaf blower🙄
He is by Gino R.V.F. and out of a DHH/Morgan mare.