English Rider Thinking of Doing a Western Dressage Test - Any "Gotchas"?

Both CLB15 and MVP have further clarified my entire stance, concerning WD

I have all too often read where people assume that a basic dressage training in beneficial for all horses, and while I totally agree with a progressive training program that teaches complete body control, there is an important difference between classic dressage and any good western training program, that reflects end goals
Right from the beginning, in the snaffle or bosal stage, that western horse is trained in such a manner that he moves towards being eventually ridden one handed, working off of the indirect rein, while keeping self carriage and collections, topline, correct total body position , without bit support. It is impossible to teach that, if you never give the horse a chance to be correct on his own, nor start to use the indirect rein as secondary to the direct rein, and eventually use the indirect rein first, going to the direct rein only if needed, and then, and only then, going to a curb bit, riding that horse one handed.
Yes, during the transition period, as we have shortened the time frame in producing a bridle horse, from the vaquero days, whether that is good or bad, is a separate issue, but it has resulted in trainers using a transtition curb, that has short shanks, is loose jawed and has a jointed mouth, and that does allow them, while training, to pick up that second rein when needed.
This in no way means that the horse is not shown one handed in a curb, or is ridden constantly with contact and two hands on the reins with that curb
I find merit in having a Vaquero type training program for western dressage, thus keeping it a truly western progressive training program that works towards a bridle horse, ridden as that finished horse should be, western, and not English

[QUOTE=KIloBright;7937820]

I have all too often read where people assume that a basic dressage training in beneficial for all horses, and while I totally agree with a progressive training program that teaches complete body control, there is an important difference between classic dressage and any good western training program, that reflects end goals
Right from the beginning, in the snaffle or bosal stage, that western horse is trained in such a manner that he moves towards being eventually ridden one handed, working off of the indirect rein, while keeping self carriage and collections, topline, correct total body position , without bit support.[/QUOTE]

Wrong. Classical dressage also teaches one handed riding. I had such instruction in France and you will see all the great riders performing one handed in a full bridle at some point or another, because it is part of the fundamental training. And of course, in war, one needed to hold the saber or other weapon in one hand.:slight_smile:

A couple of examples here, Nuno Olievera instructing:

http://avilionclassicaldressage.com/index.htm

http://avilionclassicaldressage.com/Background.html

One handed flying changes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cqNhqMm_BE

Another one handed riding snippet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldW0YaNgcFo

And, of course, vaqueros:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFxAR84Fhr4

And finally, a California vaquero just 'cause my friend Juni Fisher is singing. Stylistic differences only, the training fundamentals are the same:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbOl0Vc4faY

Yes, but Haute ecole and classical dressage are not one and the same. I have yet to see an Olympic dressage rider ride with one hand
Grande Prix, the upper level of dressage is ridden with two hands
Had a trainer I know who has won western riding at AQHA shows, go to England, with a horse he trained.
Both he and a dressage rider did a demo of a series flying lead changes.
He then dropped the bridle and did the same flying changes, while the dressage horse could not do it, without a bridle.
A spin, has a horse staying flat and forward, crossing over, not elevating and hopping around
Vaquero training, of course, came out of dressage/war horse training
The modern western performance horse also works with way less contact then either the old Vaquero bridle horses, or a dressage horse, able to runa reining pattern or ride an equitation pattern or a complicated trail pattern, on a totally drapped rein-something not seen in classical dressage. It is not just the one handed riding, as of course, even the Us Calvary or any war horse had to be able to be guided that way, allowing the rider to shoot or hack with the other arm and hand. Heck, even the Indians rode that way, so they could shoot a bow or throw a lance.
It is that total drapped rein, and not just the one hand riding, and you don’t get there by always riding with contact

I watched just a few of those first video clips, and while that rider might be riding with one hand, the rider is also still riding with a lot of rein support and contact, and therein lies the difference
If a horse is very broke in the body, it is easy to go from riding with a snaffle to riding one handed with a curb-western riders do it a ll the time. The DIFFERENCE, is that the horse also learns total self carriage, able to be ridden one handed, and on a loose rein. Now if you can teaCH THAT WHILE NEVER ALLOWING THE HORSE TO RATE OFF OF SEAT AND LEGS ALONE-then maybe I am wrong and you are right, but until then, I stand by the fact that a dressage basic isn’t desirable for all western horses, esp those that eventually must be shown on a loose rein, rated off of seat and legs alone.
Tot aht end, when a western horse moves on to a curb, he also should have learned to rate off of seat and legs, so that not only can he be ridden one handed, but also on a loose rein

Wow, KiloBright. Sorry to say that your ignorance becomes more glaring with each post. And that’s a shame, you seem well intentioned but just don’t know what you don’t know.

Do you think that you get either one of these, by never letting the horse carry himself on a totally loose rein?
Riding one handed on a curb, is only part of the picture. The other part, that is allowing that horse to carry himself on a totally loose rein , during training, picking him up as needed, until he can carry himself through an entire pattern off of seat and legs alone.
Thanks, for your superior know it all attitude. Have you even shown in western riding or a tough senior trail course?
Your ignorance is also evident, good intentions or not!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77DmFN9Jk0Q
I more than agreed that the basics of total body control, working off of legs, guiding between the reins is universal.
Having the end product of a horse working on a loose rein is not
And you, I take it, know everything, including showing a finished western horse
You don’t get either of this, always riding with some contact, no matter how light, or you sure have a different training program than any western trainer That I have taken clinics with
No, I have not ridden with those European masters, but I sure as heck have ridden with World champion reiners, trail competitors, western riding and yes, western pl.

[QUOTE=KIloBright;7938604]

Thanks, for your superior know it all attitude. Have you even shown in western riding or a tough senior trail course?
Your ignorance is also evident, good intentions or not!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77DmFN9Jk0Q
I more than agreed that the basics of total body control, working off of legs, guiding between the reins is universal.
Having the end product of a horse working on a loose rein is not
And you, I take it, know everything, including showing a finished western horse
You don’t get either of this, always riding with some contact, no matter how light, or you sure have a different training program than any western trainer That I have taken clinics with
No, I have not ridden with those European masters, but I sure as heck have ridden with World champion reiners, trail competitors, western riding and yes, western pl.[/QUOTE]

I have not claimed expertise and indeed seek to improve my knowledge of horses every day.

But I do indeed know how to ride off contact as well as on, and yes, I have won at western pleasure, reining, western riding, trail, barrels, poles, equitation and more. First ribbons in the 60s, last in those events maybe 10 years ago. And you?

Wait a sec.

I don’t think dressage is primarily about “absolutely controlling the horse’s body.” If that happens, it’s a means to an end. That end is a horse who can physically and mentally do a tough job with a tactful, easy ride.

Also, when I speak of “many roads to Rome” and “different relationships with the bit” in each discipline, what I mean is

  1. The “Rome” in this case is a horse who carries his body with more weight on his hind quarters than on his front end. IMO, every horseman out there-- from a jumper to a roper to someone asking a horse to skip-- essentially wants to retrain the horse to use his body this way.

  2. That means that it really doesn’t/shouldn’t matter what he’s doing with his neck and head
. except that he must hold those in certain positions in order to help himself balance with his weight well back.

So take “head set” out of the equation except as a kind of epiphenomenon to the biomechanics of a horse shifting his weight back onto his hind legs.

2a. And that goes double for the discussion of how much contact a horse has. Look, if you back up and remember that we only really care about what happens from the shoulders back, it shouldn’t matter how the horse is ridden in the hand in order to get that.

Of course, the fact that our species is most dextrous in the hands, and that one easy way to influence the horse’s balance is to control the position of his head, and it’s really easy to do that with a piece of metal in his mouth
. well, that’s how you get to the attention we put on how horses are bridled and ridden.

With that in mind, I have a different response to this idea.

[QUOTE=KIloBright;7938347]
The DIFFERENCE, is that the horse also learns total self carriage, able to be ridden one handed, and on a loose rein. Now if you can teaCH THAT WHILE NEVER ALLOWING THE HORSE TO RATE OFF OF SEAT AND LEGS ALONE-then maybe I am wrong and you are right, but until then, I stand by the fact that a dressage basic isn’t desirable for all western horses, esp those that eventually must be shown on a loose rein, rated off of seat and legs alone.
Tot aht end, when a western horse moves on to a curb, he also should have learned to rate off of seat and legs, so that not only can he be ridden one handed, but also on a loose rein[/QUOTE]

Dressagists want horses to be in self-carriage, too. And they certainly do teach a horse to rate of the seat and legs.

FWIW, the dressagists’ talk about noting how well a horse pushes into contact with the (snaffle) bit or not is an artifact of their training system. But upper level horses get to a relationship with the bit that is someone similar to what western folks using “signal bits” is like.

Don’t take the talk about hands or contact too seriously, friends.

This is the kind of conversation that will keep people from even trying the sport of WD. Or regular dressage.

I get that some of you have a lot of experience, but the OP came here to get tips on trying WD and some people have followed (like me), thinking to learn something for the future.

But
now I wonder if WD will just end up being a place for classical dressage riders to go to and condescendingly shake their heads at the ignorance of the newbies. Who
like me, probably just wanted to learn to do something new with their horse.

I think anything offered to Western riders to improve their riding is fantastic. Or for people like me, who have no interest in fancy warmbloods and wearing white britches. Just looking for a venue to work with my horse.

[QUOTE=S1969;7938776]
This is the kind of conversation that will keep people from even trying the sport of WD. Or regular dressage.

I get that some of you have a lot of experience, but the OP came here to get tips on trying WD and some people have followed (like me), thinking to learn something for the future.

But
now I wonder if WD will just end up being a place for classical dressage riders to go to and condescendingly shake their heads at the ignorance of the newbies. Who
like me, probably just wanted to learn to do something new with their horse.

I think anything offered to Western riders to improve their riding is fantastic. Or for people like me, who have no interest in fancy warmbloods and wearing white britches. Just looking for a venue to work with my horse.[/QUOTE]

I think they just should have found another name for that class than WD, because it just doesn’t fit conceptually.

Yes, there is single handed riding in dressage, I remember some Rainer Klimke demonstrations years ago where he did just that and others also.
The reason we don’t see it in lower dressage classes is because the horses are not trained to go there until the higher levels.

Why a different name would have been more appropriate for that class?

The important difference, riding with contact or without is too large to bridge just by using a name and some rules and expect people not to be confused, when the basics are quickly different for both.

I say, WD will have to grow way more and define itself better, before people can do more than be tentative when trying to train and show there.
As is now, it is no fish or fowl, sorry to say.
Does that matter in the end, or being just one more class to enter, who cares, if you are competing and like to enter all kinds of classes?

That is how reining started, it was a filler class and look where it went, where it is today.

Those that want to show WD, why not, just realize it is a new discipline and trying to find it’s legs and that there are bumps to smooth over yet is ok.

[QUOTE=Bluey;7938834]
I think they just should have found another name for that class than WD, because it just doesn’t fit conceptually.[/QUOTE]

Yes, but who really cares? It’s like people who don’t want gay marriage to use the word “marriage” because it means something different to them. :rolleyes: If classical “dressagists” don’t think WD is the same, or as good, or correct
they certainly have no obligation to do it.

All disciplines will have to define themselves, and it won’t happen overnight. It seems that the only discussions around WD are about how it’s not “really dressage.”

I’d love to see it picked up by 4H clubs instead of trail classes or game classes. What an idea, western kids learning to ride more correctly! Even if it’s not Haute ecole or classical dressage
isn’t that still a good thing?

[QUOTE=S1969;7938776]
This is the kind of conversation that will keep people from even trying the sport of WD. Or regular dressage. [/QUOTE]

Wait a sec (again).

I don’t think the “invasion” of dressage to anything westerner has to be a diss of western training
.unless the folks trying it out think there is something lacking in various established western disciplines.

As the WDAA people explained it to me, their demographic was the person who rode better than the Parelli crowd, was bored by WP, was a little intimidated by the speed events, wanted some goals that you might not get as a dedicated trail rider. Some of these people have deep experience in Western (show) world and some nice horses that they really like and trust. They want something to do with them.

And Dressage does not boil down to fancy WBs and white britches. Read my posts above and I think you’ll see that I’m on your side with respect to disliking the snotty vibe that can come from DressageWorld.

That said, don’t confuse a deeply-theorized kind of riding and training with elitism. And for the love of God, don’t make the mistake of thinking that Dressagists over-analyze everything and Western is more of a “do what you feel,” discipline. There is plenty of thought behind great western training.

Had the Germans (particularly) and other Western European cultures been so into writing books on what they do
. and had working horsemen had more time to sit around and write books on making up their exquisite bridle horses
. we’d have a more even playing field with respect to riding that looked way, way technical.

And I will add, too, that the evolution of English World into a very expensive, well-organized industry, plus the rising popularity of dressage handed a marketing opportunity to the AQHA. All those guys had to do is make WesternWorld look more welcoming and less elitist. And that wasn’t hard; English world handed it to 'em. But don’t be fooled by some good and bad marketing.

In short, there’s no reason to feel excluded from a discipline. If the technical stuff is too much for you, well, that’s a choice than transcends disciplines.

[QUOTE=S1969;7938859]
Yes, but who really cares? It’s like people who don’t want gay marriage to use the word “marriage” because it means something different to them. :rolleyes: If classical “dressagists” don’t think WD is the same, or as good, or correct
they certainly have no obligation to do it.

All disciplines will have to define themselves, and it won’t happen overnight. It seems that the only discussions around WD are about how it’s not “really dressage.”

I’d love to see it picked up by 4H clubs instead of trail classes or game classes. What an idea, western kids learning to ride more correctly! Even if it’s not Haute ecole or classical dressage
isn’t that still a good thing?[/QUOTE]

I was just trying to explain that there is an important difference in concepts on how you train and ride between dressage and western riding, why we are having these discussions, that’s all.

Will be interesting to see what comes out of this down the years.

[QUOTE=mvp;7938862]
In short, there’s no reason to feel excluded from a discipline. If the technical stuff is too much for you, well, that’s a choice than transcends disciplines.[/QUOTE]

No, I’m quite sure I can understand the technical stuff. :rolleyes:

I guess my point, and perhaps the problem is that this is COTH and not another discussion board - is that every time I have ever read a thread about WD it turns into a discussion about how it fails to hold up to “real” dressage.

So, for someone like the OP (should they still be around), or for me or anyone else reading this thread - is that it never really ends up being as informative as I would hope. For someone that has never entered a dressage arena, posts like this are likely to just drive people away from trying. I don’t have a dressage coach, I don’t have a dressage background. But I might try it anyway, if I thought I could learn something new and improve my riding.

I will be the person who doesn’t know exactly how to ride a 20 meter circle. But, if it was fun, what better way to learn than to try? However, if it’s not going to be fun
why would anyone put themselves out there for such criticism, not just from the judges but from everyone watching ringside? I can see why a lot of western riders would steer clear of this entirely, which is too bad.

[QUOTE=Bluey;7938878]
I was just trying to explain that there is an important difference in concepts on how you train and ride between dressage and western riding, why we are having these discussions, that’s all.

Will be interesting to see what comes out of this down the years.[/QUOTE]

I think so, too.

I’m willing to give a fledging discipline a chance to “find its legs,”-- an apt expression here. I won’t be riding my horses two-handed in a curb, mainly because I don’t see what performance from the horse I can get from that, that I’d want.

So what? I’ll just show in a snaffle until I learn to take a horse to the bosal and spade bit stages. And then I’ll use those as I think is appropriate for the horse and my level of education.

And damn, I’d do that in the USDF dressage ring and ask my horse’s performance to be evaluated by those judges

 if USDF dressage didn’t explicitly rule out western tack.

Coming to this thread late and I haven’t read all the posts, just kinda skimmed.

But there are also two “versions” for lack of a better word.

There is Western Dressage via the Western Dressage Association of America (http://www.westerndressageassociation.org/) and then Cowboy Dressage via Eitan Beth-Halachmy (www.cowboydressage.com).

I remember reading something on what used to be a “group member organization” site for WDAA that decided it did not match their philosophy and that they are going the Cowboy Dressage route instead.

Darn it, found the group that had gone from WD to CD, but I can’t find the article where they’d said /why/ as I’d thought it kind of explained the difference interestingly/well http://wisconsincowboydressage.org/

[QUOTE=mvp;7938678]
Wait a sec.

I don’t think dressage is primarily about “absolutely controlling the horse’s body.”

Dressagists want horses to be in self-carriage, too. And they certainly do teach a horse to rate of the seat and legs.

FWIW, the dressagists’ talk about noting how well a horse pushes into contact with the (snaffle) bit or not is an artifact of their training system. But upper level horses get to a relationship with the bit that is someone similar to what western folks using “signal bits” is like.

Don’t take the talk about hands or contact too seriously, friends.[/QUOTE]

True enough. And across a whole lot of disciplines one sees an artificial headset instead of developing a horse properly, letting its body and musculature develop, and seeing what you naturally get for head carriage. People would be amazed if they weren’t in such a hurry to get ribbons.

Lendon Gray and a reiner did a pas de deux exhibition during the Washington International Horse Show back in the 80s, precisely to show that English and western are more alike than they are different.

I think the western dressage idea ought to be fun. There will no doubt be funky developments, that’s true in competitive dressage where despite the published standards ‘no’ winning horse these days has the poll as the highest point. And then of course you have ‘headsets’ across a number of western disciplines that are purely artificial, no relationship to function. But such is showing, generally, isn’t it?

[QUOTE=Beverley;7938622]
I have not claimed expertise and indeed seek to improve my knowledge of horses every day.

But I do indeed know how to ride off contact as well as on, and yes, I have won at western pleasure, reining, western riding, trail, barrels, poles, equitation and more. First ribbons in the 60s, last in those events maybe 10 years ago. And you?[/QUOTE]

I won’t leave your question un -answered Bev, and then I will let this topic drift along as it might wish to.
I also try and learn and realize horses are a lifetime of learning.
Your remark, concerning my 'ignorance hit a nerve, as you might well have expected.
I don’t mind any good argrument, based on facts, but I like anyone else, take exception on a personal attack
I have not been showing quite as long as you, as I started out just trail riding and starting young horses.
I started showing, when I started raising horses, so that I could promote them myself, under saddle
Along that route, I took clinics with as many different people I could, that were successful in the events I was showing in at that time.
I started out about 30 years ago, showing in reining, working cowhorse games and western riding. Produced several superior western riding horses and all around hi -pt horses, Roms in Trail, reining, western riding, HUS and western pleasure
Won National ApHCC national amateur pole bending and western riding
Yes, I did game my horses way back when, as they were very broke, being shown in reining and western riding and cattle events
I switched to all around horses in the last 15 years or so, thus changed my breeding program some, started to ride western pl, and HUS, taking clinics
I even took dressage lessons one winter, because no local HUS clinics were available
I also know how to ride with contact, and in fact, since I also show many of my horses open, won a large English pleasure class, against more traditional breeds, under a judge from a dressage background
I never implicated that good training does not have fundamental similar basics.
My simple point was that there is a unique difference on how you train with that contact, if gearing a horse to be eventually shown on loose rein, between dressage and a good western training program.
I know a trainer who gave a clinic at the Mane Event this year. Her topic was on riding/'showing/training a western pleasure horse
Before jumping on that one, her background started as working on large ranches, starting colts
She has some English riders coming over to ride western pleasure. The biggest thing that she has to teach them, is not to try and micro manage the horse constantly
It is quite easy to teach a horse to go on contact, that has been ridden western on a loose rein, as the horse understands contact from he time he was first ridden in a snaffle, and one still used contact in working with a finished horse, when needed, training, to fix something or work on a new maneuver
Pretty difficult to try and rate a horse on a loose rein that has always been shown with contact.
Therefore, there is a fundamental difference, as that western horse is given that total release in training, that eventually allows that horse to require less and less pick up, so that he can perform and hold frame and collection, while rating speed , without any bit contact
THat was my point, and I stick by it.
I also don’t just show, but have spent a lot of time packing into remote wilderness, with my husband, who is atrophy hunter. I have ridden trails only frequented by die hard trophy hunters, and slept in tents without a stove, packed in 30 miles, when a blizzard moved in
I have retired from actively raising horses, as I am at an age where starting colts is best left for yoiunger people, and those without double knee replacements. I have also slowed down my showing endeavors, esp at the breed level, still trail ride, although I no longer will rough it as in those days when I was young, preferring to have a tent with a stove. Not really keen on packing out elk , in the dark, in freezing weather any more, or sitting above the treelines, with a cold wind howling, holding the horses, while hubby stalks a BigHorn Ram
I’m not liking as to how this topic is going, with you taking me down the path of needing to validate myself.
The way western horses were shown in the 60s, concerning rein contact, has evolved.
You only need to look at a reining stop from back then, compared to now, or western pl, a trail pattern, or even the dry work in working cowhorse, to see that there is much more finesse today, with the horses being shown with less contact
A winning reining stop, in the 'good ole days, often showed a horse with front end jammed into the ground, head up , neck braced, mouth open. Yes, they were hard and deep stops, but they certainly were not pretty, like a good reining stop today
I won’t go down the western pleasure path, except to say those those horses winning western pl in the 60s and 70s would not touch a pleasure horse today, either ina mount of self carriage or movement.
You might not like either of these changes, but that is not the point. What is the point, is for a horse to have that total self carriage on a loose rein, requires a training program that works towards that eventual goal, even though most of the fundamentals , far as good basic training are universal
As for WD, let it evolve as it may, as it affects me no more than the direction halter has gone
You might not like the change

KiloBright, get over yourself, there have been no personal attacks on you, I stated opinions. And yes, sorry to say, your blanket statements here and elsewhere- because of the way they are phrased- (e.g. ‘half broke mustangs being sent off to war,’ dressage riders don’t ride one-handed because you’ve never seen it, heck, I invited further discussion on another thread and you just plain went silent) do show holes in your knowledge, because you’ve sure never come back with a ‘gee, I didn’t know that,’ you just stick to whatever ‘fact’ you have insisted is so. We all have holes in our knowledge, no sin there, but how would you have someone ‘disagree’ when you insist that something is the way you say it is, just because you have said so, never mind the supporting information that is furnished for you to see?

You complain about having to validate yourself, and yet it was you who stated the following:

“Thanks, for your superior know it all attitude. Have you even shown in western riding or a tough senior trail course?”

I didn’t take offense, I answered the question. The question YOU posed. In return you imply that I am requiring you to ‘validate yourself.’ Nonsense. I answered your question and seems pretty civilized if you ask what someone you disagree with has or hasn’t done, that you be willing to answer the same question.

Heck, you go on in this last post about things I’ve already posted about, well okay, it’s not a sin to not read every post in a thread, but read it again, please, you imply, whether you mean to or not, that because I showed first in the 60s and 70s I must not know how pleasure has evolved since then, which is more nonsense, since I previously indicated that I last showed (and won) about 10 years ago. You’ve also apparently passed judgment to the effect that I don’t like change. Sheesh!

So. In summary, get a grip. I do not ‘attack posters,’ I simply agree, or disagree, with what is written, not who writes it. In particular, I will weigh in if I see ‘free advice’ by anyone that I think is bad advice. Everyone should of course take everything posted hereabouts, by you, me, and everyone else, with a grain of salt, but it doesn’t hurt to remind folks of that now and then.

If you really do like discussion (which does not come across in your posts), then discuss and you might be surprised at the results.

Must have missed that post where I went silent, Bev, as that is not my style
By calling my posts ignorant, lacking knowledge, sorry, but that is a personnal attack
It is true that western pleasure has evolved, have no idea where you showed at 10 years ago, but know it requires a different basic training program than dressage, to get that horse shown in the manner that is required today.
Nothing you have written has proven otherwise
My point was never to question where, how, etc you showed, but merely responded to your answer to my statement that EVERY HORSE IN EVERY DICIPLINE DID NOT need a basis in dressage, was incorrect
You would also have reining trainers and western pleasure trainers disagree with you, far as putting something like WD as a basis for their training, firm in your belief that there is no basic difference.
Nothing wrong with WD, that some bit rules won’t fix, but that does not make it a fundamental way of training a horse in western disciplines, esp stock horse, where that total release of rein is required.
Disagree with my points all you wish, and i DON’T TAKE IT PERSONAL. cALL ME IGNORANT, and I have every right to!
I believe that I have been around horses for as many years as you have. Do not assume you know me, or what I have done with horses, by reading on the internet
You might also be surprised if you truly discussed issues with me, instead of taking the stance that your views/experiences are the ultimate reference
I love seeing a good working cowhorse, or a good horse in any discipline. That is why I also watch the international show jumping at Spruce Meadows, and was very impressed by many of the demos given there, that included dressage demos by Olympic level riders
My son is still into working cowhorse, and I have raised horses that have gone on, after being sold, as ApHC world champions in working cowhorse, and ApHC national champions in reining
I accept that you have a great wealth of horse experience, but you need to accept that you are not unique in this aspect.

I guess you were referring to the post on a ‘tiedown’,Bev< that I failed to see where you commented on my drawrein response. I have thus gone back and clarified to you, my stance, which certainly was NOT for that OP to use draw reins, or am I a believer in draw reins period-but was responding in general, to those that did use draw reins, with an open mind, allowing that there are a few cases where they might be justified, short term, in good hands. You can go there to see my response, that you obviously took out of context, and you yourself, failed to read posts that led up to my statement.

Lets move on

Here is avideo of a good example of double reins in working cowhorse, at least I think so

http://www.holycowperformancehorses.com/horse.asp?Id=622

[QUOTE=S1969;7938928]
No, I’m quite sure I can understand the technical stuff. :rolleyes:

I guess my point, and perhaps the problem is that this is COTH and not another discussion board - is that every time I have ever read a thread about WD it turns into a discussion about how it fails to hold up to “real” dressage.

So, for someone like the OP (should they still be around), or for me or anyone else reading this thread - is that it never really ends up being as informative as I would hope. For someone that has never entered a dressage arena, posts like this are likely to just drive people away from trying. I don’t have a dressage coach, I don’t have a dressage background. But I might try it anyway, if I thought I could learn something new and improve my riding.

I will be the person who doesn’t know exactly how to ride a 20 meter circle. But, if it was fun, what better way to learn than to try? However, if it’s not going to be fun
why would anyone put themselves out there for such criticism, not just from the judges but from everyone watching ringside? I can see why a lot of western riders would steer clear of this entirely, which is too bad.[/QUOTE]

I’m sure you can understand the technical stuff. I didn’t mean to imply otherwise.

But my second point still stands: If anyone walks in with a chip on her shoulder about how dressagists just live to invade all disciplines and tell them how they get it wrong, then that’s too bad. It’s also unnecessary.

FWIW, there are some things with horses that the western horsemen in my life do way better than do most of the dressagists. So I rarely feel snubbed by a dressage person going on about being correct and knowing the One True Way. If they are right, I take that on and use it my riding. If they are wrong, well, I have one more reminder that most folks put their pants on one leg at a time.

I don’t get overly pantie-wadded about any condescension some dresseur tries to put over. And, more often than not, they aren’t actually talking about their methods with the express purpose of making the other guy wrong.