I am not a fan of Markel. I started “self insuring” after myself and my friend having to deal with them. For me, I bought a youngster and as youngsters can be frizzy and klutzy, I reported a few minor injuries and one illness (choke) but never made a claim. Without any process by which I could get a vet exam to show all the various boo-boos were no longer an issue, they excluded all said body parts. I think all that was still covered was her head and her right front leg. Their loss. She has been very healthy and sound but I have kept the premiums in MY bank account and now have a considerable savings account saved for health issues.
My my friend had a terrible time with Markel and her lame gelding. She was able to get him in a study at WSU which gave her a definitive diagnosis. Her young strapping gelding had torn the impar ligaments in both front feet. One foot was nearly 75% torn. She knew from the get go, he was not going to get better. She wanted to euthanize and they said no…she had to try x, y and z. Z being nerving. Of course, none of it helped (in fact, the nerving was very short lived then he was much worse as I would guess he farted around in no pain and completely tore the one foot) and they finally agreed with euthanasia. Conveniently, it was over a year out from the original injury and they wouldn’t pay mortality either. She really wishes she had gone with her gut and saved the horse 8 months of suffering. Not only that, the insurance company paid out far more for treatment than if they had approved the euthanasia and paid the whopping $6500 mortality policy. It doesn’t make much sense.
I prefer to have control of my horses treatment so I will pay. Price isn’t everything…keep looking.
Susan