GM Clinic at Persimmon Tree Farm

Maybe you should lobby this lot ?
https://www.mdhorsecouncil.org/about-us/governance/board-of-directors

1 Like

If someone doesn’t care about breaking the rules of an organization they’re a voluntary participant in, then they shouldn’t be part of the organization in the first place. If someone doesn’t care about getting a six month or year suspension, or about fines, or about getting banned, well I guess that’s their prerogative. Doesn’t mean the USEF/SafeSport shouldn’t still issue their penalties.

11 Likes

Please berate my child and publicly humiliate him/her about a crest release (and some personal features too).

19 Likes

Told you he would show up in Europe

2 Likes

He didnt…he was doing a clinic in where? Virginia?

ETA, apologies, maryland.

2 Likes

Would not the FEI and or the show organizer recognize the usef sanctions so he would be escorted off grounds in Europe?(sorry if the has already been discussed how fei applies usef/safe sport bans)

3 Likes

screaming about what? GM clinic at Persimmon Tree farm? or the ā€œStand by Georgeā€ contingent?

Agree, and putting myself out on a limb here, but Europeans do seem to excel at producing top level SJ, and without the aid of a trust fund as many of the US upcoming crop of GP riders do. Over there some/many grow up fox-hunting so I guess that may qualify as starting off riding hunters :lol::lol: but there is definitely far more SJ there than US. Here most the Jr. riders are doing hunters and equitation. I’ve been to several shows in Ireland (small local stuff) and the kids and ponies are jumping around pretty solid courses, def not the cross-rail and 2’ stuff like they are here. I recall one show where the large ponies were jumping 3’6’ courses! In my neck of the woods, it’s hard filling 2’6’ classes at local shows now, 3’ forget it.

4 Likes

yes, if he was there but not sure if he can be doing a clinic in Maryland and going to Aachen Germany. And then there’s the issue of USA being on the banned entry list for Germany due to COVID.

The SJ last weekend in Aachen was a new event this year, I was referring to CHIO Aachen. While I’ve heard that some disciplines talked about leaving USEF (QH and maybe Arabian?) I’ve not heard anything about hunters. Certainly plenty of folks (in my circle hunters, jumpers and event ers) are grumbling about USEF over a variety of issues. As I’m sure you’re aware USEF recognizes breeds and disciplines - of those disciplines some are international and others national.

Sorry for not being clear. By in large the hunter crowd has been desperately trying to find excuses for GHM violating his ban and steaming about his ban as unfair. The push back hasn’t been nearly as much from other disciplines.

The misunderstanding of the rules at this point strikes me as curious. I don’t want to say ā€œwillfully ignorantā€Ā or the like, but there are resources, like Safe Sport itself, to get the answers to questions. At this point I think it’s disingenuous to come to CoTH with questions and when one doesn’t like the answer chalk it up to someone’s interpretation. I know you have emailed for answers to your questions so I don’t include you in my observations.

9 Likes

Yes, the FEI recognizes national federation sanctions.

4 Likes

I know what you were referring to, which was a misinterpretation of what I said.

The hunter contingent has been very very vocal for years about wanting to form their own organization not subject to usef doping rules specifically, and now safe sport figures very very strongly in their arguments.

I don’t know plenty of show jumpers arguing against the same protections for horses and children that the hunter community is so upset about, but as I’ve said for years, I fully support their creation of their own club with no restrictions protecting horses or athletes from abuse. Kick on, then the rest of us know who to avoid.

6 Likes

I don’t see anything wrong with supporting this. It’s what some want and it’s not a slight to support it.

1 Like

thanks. Trust me I’ve read the rules/policy for both Safe Sport and USEF Safe Sport though admittedly have not read cover to cover but posted here where I believe the area which I question. Please don’t think my questioning if Safe Sport/USEF jurisdiction covers USEF members outside sanction competitions as support for Morris as that is not it at al. Its for my own knowledge. What would happen if any of us participated in a clinic/activity with a SS banned person who was lesser known so we didn’t realize they were banned?

Honestly I don’t know or follow who’s in the ā€œstand with Georgeā€ crowd. I’m not one of them. I find it interesting how many ā€œstand with georgeā€ but their social media posts outrage over people like Epstein, Weinstein etc. From what I’ve seen it seems to be a mixed bag of people defending him… but I guess I’ve paid more attention to the more well known folks\

1 Like

I am not sure it is accurate to say the vast majority of hunters want to be free from drug rules and Safe Sport. I think there is a vocal contingent but I would not consider them a strong majority. Lots of us want to play by the rules and don’t want horses drugged or minors abused.

20 Likes

You are probably entirely correct. It just so happens that it’s not just a vocal contingent, it’s also a contingent that contains some very successful riders and trainers.

9 Likes

You are correct, however the loudest voices and a good deal of influential want to start their own club. Or at least threaten.

5 Likes

Yeah no worries. I get there is confusion, but many who are confused hold on to it because they want to train with people who sexually assault others. That IMO is disgusting. As intelligent and as connected as some are, they still try to play the ignorant card.

7 Likes

Well I can assure you I am not one of them. I know I’ve been a holdout on this rule thing but I have no interest in ever attending a GM clinic again and haven’t in can’t tell you how many years. Which I know seems quite odd given my posts but it’s the truth.:).

I did miss that. Sorry.