[QUOTE=Lady Eboshi;8899932]
According to anthropologists, no ancient tribe of humans was ever “vegetarian” if meat or fish were available. Probably because the lack thereof has significant disadvantages for growth, brain development, and fertility. Why would people who have to exert great energy to find food prefer sources with the least-dense calories and nutrients which is mostly indigestible?
Only relatively recently has it been chosen for religious reasons (usually to facilitate advanced meditative states among clergy and then spread to some of the lay population, as in India) or personal choice.
It’s nobody else’s business if someone wants to eat a restricted diet. It BECOMES our concern when “activists” try to restrict our own choices.[/QUOTE]
Right, some people don’t even know what they don’t know, do they.
Kind of easy to learn, google is your friend if you don’t.
Humans evolved by eating all they could find that didn’t kill them, just as every other out there in this world.
To think we can deny that is just not the way this world works.
Even today, with all the knowledge and supplements out there, thanks to our rather sophisticated civilization, there are still plenty of people that try to follow vegan principles and die for their mistakes, a friend’s mother one of those.
Not saying people may not die for other dietary problems, from other causes, but yes, being a vegan is not as friendly to humans as being what we evolved to be by any measure, omnivorous critters.
Those that are vegan, for their own very valid reasons or none, just need to remember that their exclusionary, restricted diet, again, their right to eat what they wish without need to give anyone reason why, that diet is not mainstream for good reason.