<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jjsmom:
OK, I tried to stay out of it. But there is something wrong with the Olympics being used as the goal and defining factor of European Warmblood breeding…
The Hanoverian studbook was opened in 1888, BEFORE the 1st modern Olympic games were held in 1896 in Athens. Does anyone contend Hanoverians aren’t Warmbloods under either the hot + cold definition, or the sporthorse capital “W” warmblood definition? No. Olympic aspirations cannot be “the” defining feature of what is a warmblood. There were no Olympics when most of the warmblood breeds were developed.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Oh, thank you. I was reading that, and rereading it, and wondering about the precognitive ability of those who started the registries, and couldn’t quite figure out HOW they figured out that there would be modern Olympics, much less which sports would be in there. I mean, I know the Europeans are good, but I didn’t think they were THAT good.
But hey, what do I know? I have a Dutch WB… (well, and a TB and an App. Can they be warmbloods too?)
Note to self: don’t leg yeild into the electric fence.