Many of you are aware of a recent case of 12 well breed dressage horses in Oregon being removed from the care of a woman that many of us knew. Everything from mares in foal, foals, yearlings, and aged horses were found in varying states of starvation and neglect.
The horses were signed over by the owner to a rescue group as part of a plea bargain. By the time the original breeders of these horses learned of this, the horses had already been placed in a matter of a few days. All of these horses are registered and most were microchipped.
The rescue claims itâs under no obligation to contact the breeders of these animals and put them first in line to adopt. Almost all the breeders and former owners would have stepped right up to retrieve these horses and pay any outstanding bills on them had they been given the opportunity. This has caused an uproar in the breeding community about the protocol utilized to place these horses. Many people are very upset. I understand the urgent need to get them in stable situations and get them immediate help, but foster homes could have been utilized until the breeders could be contacted.
As breeders, most of us are deeply concerned about the welfare of the horses we produce, many of us follow them for life. Many of us are having a hard time understanding why the breeders were not contacted and given the chance to adopt first. After all, we know these horses best, we cherish their hertigage, and many of us still own the mothers and grandmothers of these animals.
We microchip for identification and safety reasons, are rescues under no obligation to scan for a chip like the humane society does upon intake?
How can we better protect our horses in the future to prevent something like this from happening? Some people even had clear language in their sales agreements about the horseâs safe return in the event the owner could not properly care for them. I am told this is not enforceable.
I know that feedlots will often call on branded horses or TBâs with tattoos. Why are breeders not given a higher priority in these unfortunate circumstances? I feel there should be a better intake and adoption protocol in place to prioritize the homes that have the greatest interest and connection to these animals.
Letâs discuss.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=505738568094710&id=103108748357696