How popular are baroque horses in dressage today?

I’ve heard that because of the style of the Andalusian or Lusitano (among other breeds) is currently out of style in the upper level dressage community because of their preference toward collection but not necessarily extension, unlike the more popular warmbloods.

Is this the case?

Are baroque horses thought of as being taboo? Do they score just as well as more common horses? Do any big name riders/trainers feature a baroque horse rather than a more popular breed?

Just curious. :wink: I have quite an affinity for these breeds and was wondering (potentially) if any trainers/judges would be prejudiced against them.

that’s a great question! i hope some people here have more input, i would like to hear what everyone says.

I mean, I think there is a bit of a bias in the dressage world towards the modern warmblood. People will say that the sport was created for the warmblood, and the warmblood was created with the sport in mind. So both sport and horse have evolved with one another. “If you want to go to compete at the FEI levels, get a WB, make your life easier, etc etc…” But people talk a lot, haha, and I personally quite like other breeds for dressage as well - and not just for the lower levels.

I know a lot of people who prefer the baroque breeds because of their sensible minds and their rideability (this is not to say warmbloods don’t often have these qualities too, not bashing, haha). They do sometimes have trouble with the lengthenings, but they generally have a penchant for collected work, so it’s a trade off. You will see these horses at the top levels with top trainers with some consistency, where you don’t yet with a lot of other non-WBs.

I think judges are mostly trained to avoid breed bias, but the sport, at its top levels, has been created for warmbloods. So, often, other breeds (non-WBs) can seem to start out at a disadvantage. With correct work, however, the lengthenings can be strengthened, and if the horse is great at collected work, the scores should even out.

I think Kyra Kyrklund is working with a PRE prospect right now. Also, Rociero (Andalusian) has done quite well. And remember that Orlov Trotter in Hong Kong? He knocked everyone’s socks off. Talk about an “off breed.” Haha.

Anyway, you won’t see many at the big international shows, but a lot of that is because people are more comfortable taking a WB to those levels because that’s what’s always there, haha. Baroque horses are great for dressage though, just not the current “breed of choice” I guess - that will probably be a warmblood for a long time. However, I would hardly call them taboo. Now if you said you wanted to use a gypsy vanner, that would be a little more taboo, though still totally acceptable. I have a freaking 15 hand appy right now (no papers, bought to keep him from going to a shady auction) and have been shocked at people’s response to him - everybody wants to root for him. I think there is a lot more diversity in the dressage ring these days, especially for the ammies (draft crosses, haflingers, friesians, arabs, ASBs, paints, QHs, TBs, fiords, appys, crosses of every sort, etc…)

So get what you like! You’ll find prejudice everywhere - there are a lot of people (mostly not top judges or trainers though) that will tell you why WBs are not good for dressage, haha. Baroque horses are far from the most taboo breed in dressage. Shoot, after the WB, they’re probably one of the more popular breeds.

Courtney King Dye is showing a PRE, Grandioso, at PSG and I1 this year.

FWIW, and sadly…

Because of the preference in dressage for the warmblood, the dutch are slowly turning the friesian into a black warmblood. Much taller, finer, and many totally lacking in friesian type. Really, truly look like black warmbloods… :no:

Nothing wrong with a black warmblood… but… they already exist… if people want a black wamrblood, they are available…

Because of the preference in dressage for the warmblood, the dutch are slowly turning the friesian into a black warmblood. Much taller, finer, and many totally lacking in friesian type. Really, truly look like black warmbloods…

I totally (and respectfully ) disagree with this. I do not see evidence of this at all outside of the fact that they are focusing on breeding from the more modern type, longer front leg, better canter, better loin connection and a walk that is pure. All of the stallions who were approved in the last few years look very, very Friesian to me.

A horse has to have a purpose for the breed to survive and flourish. The Dutch are going back to the original Friesian, that of the riding horse, not the ones of the early 1900’s that were used to pull and only pull.

In all reality, the breed is extremely closed and there is no new blood to utilize, so essentially there is no way to actually eliminate or totally change the breed type.

We have one of the more modern sporthorse-style Friesians, and he’s very clearly still breed-type. His canter is VERY well-balanced and forward (more rideable than dramatic), but he’s very clearly recognizable (and not just by the hair) as a typey horse. He has a better hip and loin than many of the more baroque-type Friesians that I’ve seen, but he does NOT look anything like our WB, OR our other baroque Andalusian stallion.

Edit: Oh, and I don’t know if we’ll encounter any breed prejudice, as I’m not planning on showing him till fall, but I’ll let you know then :).

I showed two horses at Third Level last year, a warmblood who I sold, and an Andalusian stallion, who is now schooling all the pieces of the Grand Prix. The two were VERY different: the warmblood quite “modern,” leggy, naturally uphill but not as strong as I would have liked, the Andalusian quite baroque, talented for collection but not so scopey in the back.

They scored almost exactly alike at the end of the test, but the movement scores were different. Warmblood scored better in the extended paces; Andi better in the lateral work. Warmblood got better scores for impulsion (swing of the back); Andi better scores for submission (obedience, response to aids).

I only showed little Spanish man at a few shows, but I found the judging to be quite fair. The judges did call him out on the weaknesses that his breed brings to the table, but I don’t think it was because he was that breed; they’d take him down a score because the weaknesses were weaknesses. I’m not happy with the way I’m explaining this: I think they scored him the way they did not BECAUSE he’s an Andalusian, but because he’s not so elastic or scopey.

I find this horse incredibly charming, fun to ride, and flat-out PERFECT for his owner. So he doesn’t get a 10 on his extended gaits, or his walk; he makes his owner smile, gives her confidence, and teaches her to ride correctly.

[QUOTE=Donella;4113356]
I totally (and respectfully ) disagree with this. I do not see evidence of this at all outside of the fact that they are focusing on breeding from the more modern type, longer front leg, better canter, better loin connection and a walk that is pure. All of the stallions who were approved in the last few years look very, very Friesian to me. [/QUOTE]

That’s ok… we can disagree. There is much debate over this in the friesian community as well. There are a few facts though… they are getting more refined (less bone and substance), they are getting taller (the height requirement has gone up and many are approaching 17h now which used to be uncommon), and they are losing their feathering (and there is much concern in Holland over this as well). I don’t think all the stallions approved last year look very friesiany… some do…but many (to me) look like black TB’s with high neck sets…the high neck set being the only defining friesian characteristic…again, my opinion…not meant to be argumentative.

I find that what everyone thinks a friesian should look like is different… and people’s opinion of the various body types is different too. Many think of baroque in friesians as short front legs, built downhill, thick necks…carriage horses only. I don’t. I like the way proud meadows has defined breed types with the pictures on their web site. A baroque friesian horse (in their picture definition) is pretty square in body, thick legs… but not built downhill…and not short legged… a high neck set, average length neck… thick feathering, mane, and tail… simply put, the horse you saw in Ladyhawke. A well built, horse of substance…

This is my boy…

http://notredanesandre.com/Gallery/albums/Herman/2008_0512BI_web.jpg

I do not classify him as the modern type… yet he has sufficient length of front legs, a lot of substance, and he has feathering galore. He was a marathon driving horse…but he is now doing 2nd and 3rd level dressage work and doing well. He does not have carriage type movement…nor does he have the high knee action that many do… He is ‘friesiany’ to me… but that is my admittadly biased opinion. I go to all the friesian keurings and watch the stallion shows… I never come home with horse envy…and it is sad to me that horses like my boy are becoming a thing of the past. Horses like him can do dressage…many built like him have been successful at it… not perhaps as successful as the warmblood…but they aren’t supposed to BE warmbloods.

Sure, they might, overall be getting longer front legs, better canters, better loin connections, etc., etc… but they are losing good things as well…their substance, their hair, and many other things that people think of when they think ‘friesian’.

Sorry…just my opinion…off my soapbox now…

[QUOTE=pattir7;4113340]
FWIW, and sadly…

Because of the preference in dressage for the warmblood, the dutch are slowly turning the friesian into a black warmblood. Much taller, finer, and many totally lacking in friesian type. Really, truly look like black warmbloods… :no:

Nothing wrong with a black warmblood… but… they already exist… if people want a black wamrblood, they are available…[/QUOTE]

Not with the kind mind of the Friesian though…! I think there is a lot of good ‘baroque’ breeding going on and I hear that the brasilian Lusos are pretty awesome…and going into the right direction.
I think in short that the baroque horse tends to be compact, excellent for collection and Pi/Pa tours but lacking the elasticity throughout the back. That’s what they are trying to breed into it.
The Friesian- by nature is a cart horse, but quite elastic and usually with a great mind (dull maybe)…so add some juice to that, shorten the back and get the rear end under and correct- and you’ve got yourself a super horse…not sure that a Friesian qualifies as baroque???
The original Andi/Lusos were fighting horses - they had to be compact and quick on their feet- more like reining horses in concept. We are just changing all that compact/quick turn/physical super reactive horse into a slower, super elastic, naturally active horse. It’s a breeding challenge…and they are doing it with several interesting breeds…in the end - the smart, elastic, spongey horse with great confo and gaits will do the job- and frankly I don’t care how it’s bred…but I know it when I see it…:wink:

[QUOTE=pattir7;4113801]
That’s ok… we can disagree. There is much debate over this in the friesian community as well. There are a few facts though… they are getting more refined (less bone and substance), they are getting taller (the height requirement has gone up and many are approaching 17h now which used to be uncommon), and they are losing their feathering (and there is much concern in Holland over this as well). I don’t think all the stallions approved last year look very friesiany… some do…but many (to me) look like black TB’s with high neck sets…the high neck set being the only defining friesian characteristic…again, my opinion…not meant to be argumentative.

I find that what everyone thinks a friesian should look like is different… and people’s opinion of the various body types is different too. Many think of baroque in friesians as short front legs, built downhill, thick necks…carriage horses only. I don’t. I like the way proud meadows has defined breed types with the pictures on their web site. A baroque friesian horse (in their picture definition) is pretty square in body, thick legs… but not built downhill…and not short legged… a high neck set, average length neck… thick feathering, mane, and tail… simply put, the horse you saw in Ladyhawke. A well built, horse of substance…

This is my boy…

http://notredanesandre.com/Gallery/albums/Herman/2008_0512BI_web.jpg

I do not classify him as the modern type… yet he has sufficient length of front legs, a lot of substance, and he has feathering galore. He was a marathon driving horse…but he is now doing 2nd and 3rd level dressage work and doing well. He does not have carriage type movement…nor does he have the high knee action that many do… He is ‘friesiany’ to me… but that is my admittadly biased opinion. I go to all the friesian keurings and watch the stallion shows… I never come home with horse envy…and it is sad to me that horses like my boy are becoming a thing of the past. Horses like him can do dressage…many built like him have been successful at it… not perhaps as successful as the warmblood…but they aren’t supposed to BE warmbloods.

Sure, they might, overall be getting longer front legs, better canters, better loin connections, etc., etc… but they are losing good things as well…their substance, their hair, and many other things that people think of when they think ‘friesian’.

Sorry…just my opinion…off my soapbox now…[/QUOTE]

Very nice horse you have- really like him.
I think you have a good point- but that is the case with EVERYTHING! Even the good old WBs are so totally different today then when I was a kid or teenager- it’s not even funny anymore…the old names like Akzent, Roemer, Absatz - have been out bred and they are no longer recognizable in most current european breedings…

I love the Friesian mind and kindness- as I said before and I hope it doesn’t get lost in all this ‘breeding for most saleable horse’ as this is really what’s going on. The perception of what the market wants is what the breeder tries to create…and thus often neglects the value of the breed to a certain degree.

Why do you think there is an emphasis on changing the older established breeds to fit a discipline and not the other way round. Why not just go buy a horse that is already built for the job?

I don’t think the breed matters so much as how the horse is trained and presented. If you like Baroque horses, buy one with good conformation and go for it.

I rode Arabs, Half-Arabs, grades and QH types for years in dressage, eventing and H/J. We got the scores we deserved, good or bad. One Arab, half-Spanish, was very Baroque in type, straight profile, often mistaken for “something else”. He was very competitive in dressage, and won the only three-phase I ever took him in.

Ride your favorite breed to the best of your ability and forget about breed prejudice.

I see the Baroque horses growing in popularity for dressage here on the West Coast. Several Andalusian breeders are showing up with some lovely prospects, and those that have the resources to hire FEI capable trainers have horses in the FEI classes. I’ve seen a few Lusitanos recently that were lovely and also showing at FEI levels.

Most people in the Baroque horse world classify the Lippizans, Andalusians, Lusitanos, Friesians, and Knabstruppers and their derivatives as Baroque breeds. The Baroque horses tend to be more up-necked, have brio (flair, whatever you want to call it) in their movement, and were all originally bred as RIDING horses (the Friesian only became a driving horse in more recent history, in response to the industrial revolution). They are generally ancient breeds, long preceeding the Warmbloods and the European concept of regional breeding programs for the Olympic sports. The original dressage movements (including the high school movements) and the Baroque horses seemed to go hand-in-hand. Modern (competitive) dressage and the Warmblood horse are both relative newcomers - and as dressage evolves, so do breeding programs, both Warmblood breeding programs AND Baroque horse breeding programs.

At a recent show (mid sized show, 3 rings, 3 days), the PSG class top 3 on Friday consisted of an Andalusian, Warmblood, and Friesian cross. I’m using Friday because it had the largest number of entries (I think it was 12) in the PSG class. At another large show (that runs concurrently with a CDI show) we saw a Lusitano, an Andalusian, and a Friesian cross in the PSG ring with the Warmbloods - and generally, at a show like that, only the serious competitors come out at the higher levels!

Some of our trainers are starting to realize these horses are great competition horses for the rider who wants the gentler mind, yet the ability to be competitive at the regional/State level. Does this mean we are going to see a proliferation of these horses at the Olympics? Probably not, although a few of them are breaking into the international scene (Rociero quickly comes to mind). But there is a reason a big, reputable sport horse breeder like Iron Springs added Friesian stallions to their line up, and that we are seeing some international calibre trainers starting to investigate the baroque horses and bring some of them into their barns.

Market forces (i.e. what wins in the show ring) helps to direct what we breed for. If you look at a Warmblood from 100 years ago, you wouldn’t recognize the modern, light, airy horses of today. So why is it any surprise that the Baroque breed standards are also shifting to accomodate modern competition? And, in reality, with some of the horses (Friesians are a breed I’m pretty familiar with), the standard is really moving back toward its origins as a riding horse, although it is getting lighter in bone and type (just as the Warmblood is).

pattir - your horse is lovely! I also have one of the heavier boned Friesians, but he is uphill and leggy, and a big, lofty mover. And I have a Friesian/Warmblood cross who is quite Baroque in appearance (and just started showing PSG). I agree, we don’t need to see the breed turn into a Warmblood, but it is nice to see it moving back toward the riding horse type - better backs and loins, and the canter being bred back in!

I believe some Warmblood breeders will always feel the Warmblood is the only horse that can “do” dressage, and you will run into much more breed bias on this forum than you will in the show ring! However, I think, when you look at the FEI dressage tests, the higher up the levels you go, the more level the playing field - the collected movements become more and more important. The biggest barrier to overcome is to see qualified riders and trainers working with the talented Baroque horses.

There was a poll recently on this forum and on the “other forum” asking to rate favorite breeds for dressage, and on the other forum, the Baroque horses scored almost as high as the Warmblood horses. Kind of interesting to watch the scores.

All in all, I don’t see a decrease in popularity, I see a growing acceptance and even excitement about Baroque horses - but I can’t speak for the entire country, just for the California shows.

Really liked your post FriesianX! And thanks for the compliment on my boy…he’s my ‘once in a lifetime’ quite literally. I understand horses are bred for ‘the times’… I just find it sad that the big boned, medievil type, hairy, ‘fairy tale’ friesian is disappearing…in favor of a horse that already exists in another breed…:confused:

Well, you could buy a Shire…

I dunno, Pattir, I think your boy is plenty hairy and beautiful enough!

Here are ours (not mine, unfortunately, but I get to ride/care for them as if they were):

The Friesian:
With my 14 year old aboard, yesterday. You can see his hernia a bit in this pic.
http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k307/thatmoody/Horse/today006.jpg

The Andy:
Weird angle - his back end doesn’t look as massive as usual here :).
http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k307/thatmoody/Horse/today001.jpg

[QUOTE=Beasmom;4114235]
Well, you could buy a Shire…[/QUOTE]

It’s interesting you say that… How is it though that a shire can remain a shire since the beginning of their breed through the various market demands…but a friesian must be warped to whatever the market is of the day?

I like shires! In general though, they are ‘too heavy’ for my taste… Friesians were kinda right in the middle between something like a shire and a warmblood…but now they are getting warped more towards warmbloods in type…

[QUOTE=pattir7;4114243]
It’s interesting you say that… How is it though that a shire can remain a shire since the beginning of their breed through the various market demands…but a friesian must be warped to whatever the market is of the day?

I like shires! In general though, they are ‘too heavy’ for my taste… Friesians were kinda right in the middle between something like a shire and a warmblood…but now they are getting warped more towards warmbloods in type…[/QUOTE]

you hit the nail on the proverbial head…because Friesians are in the middle you can mold them in this or that direction within one or two generations…it would take probably 5 or 6 to ‘remake’ a Shire- and no fashion is in that long…thus they stay relatively untouched.

[QUOTE=thatmoody;4114239]
I dunno, Pattir, I think your boy is plenty hairy and beautiful enough![/QUOTE]

Thanks! He is definately plenty hairy… but he is also 15 years old. It is rare, rare, rare that I see anything even close to his feathering under 10 years old. These days they seem to get a few ‘tufts’ of hair on their pasterns and that’s it. Barely anything at all.

I won’t forget a keuring I went to 2 years ago… a gelding that was being shown for star… I took one look at him and I swear he looked like a TB… Narrow beyond most good TB’s, NO feathering, tall, skinny… looked like a good gust of wind could blow him over… even a fairly low neckset…yet, boy could he moooooove. He got his star and I about FELL OVER. Yeah, he could move…but there was nothing about him that even resembled friesian other than his color. A good TB would have outweighed him… but this friesian could have probably outrun most TB’s on a track… I went home to my boy and gave him an extra hug that day… they don’t make 'em like him anymore… well, I have seen a very few… and when I do… they are priced double what the rest are… :frowning: Or listed as ‘private treaty only’…