semantics.
No itās not. āIllegal alienā is pejorative and derogatory. An undocumented immigrant can include folks here waiting on asylum determination among other stages of getting documents.
The āillegal alienā was used in a quote by Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin. So NBC just quoted her. The paragraph that SLW posted even included āthe statement said.ā Come on peopleā¦
This 2019 Vanity Fair article indicates that despite railing against undocumented workers, the Trump Organization used them extensively at their golf courses and resorts.
I am wondering if there are any reports of ICE raids at these facilities, or are the lawns and other maintenance, as well as housekeeping, etc continuing as usual?
He made exceptions for those of course, at least temporarily, telling ICE to back off on farms and hotels. That was right before this raid, so I guess a bit of whiplash for the horse industry folks that thought they might have been included in that. Then he took it back as he does.
Reveal is a great program!
My regular sources are:
The Boston Globe (paper edition)
NPR
The Economist
All the various Bulwark podcasts - these are mostly consumed while driving to and from the barn. Lots of ex-Republicans, and snark. The more progressive podcasts drive me a bit nuts.
The Guardian
AP, Reuters, CBC, and BBC
Online local papers for sourcing
I find way too much of my news through FB, but thanks to a couple of friends who insist on sources, Iām good at verifying things.
How sure are you about that?
I guess 19 year old adult left behind doesnt fit the narrative nearly as well
From the FOX article shared here:
The 19 yr old who was left with their minor sibling, was
"āold enough to be alone but unable to drive, stranded, and powerless to leave.ā
Again, there was another younger child as well.
I guess those details donāt āfit the narrative nearly as wellā for some.
Yep and this is exactly why I didnāt bother to find the earlier requested link. I wouldnāt have mattered what it said anyway
And itāll probably get turned into a discussion by the posters for whom it doesnāt matter what the links says that 19 is plenty old to be driving and why donāt the young people all learn to drive. /s
WTH? A 64-year-old woman was grabbed by ICE while working in her garden. How can this be justified?
Kashanian arrived in the US in 1978 on a student visa and later applied for asylum, citing fears of persecution due to her fatherās ties to the US-backed Shah of Iran. Her asylum request was ultimately denied, but she was granted a stay of removal on the condition she comply with immigration requirements, a condition her family says she always met.
She has no criminal record but remains in Ice custody.
Saw this making the rounds online via Freedom of the Press Foundation so while Iām not deeply familiar w/AMNY (appears to be an NYC based outlet, probably an indie going by the siteās appearance) I trust it to be factual and solid: https://www.amny.com/police-fire/more-immigrants-arrested-ice-lower-manhattan-06262025/?ref=hellgatenyc.com
From the article: As members of the media trailed one ICE agent down the hallway, other officers made threats against the press, claiming that just a few feet from the court was a restricted area ā even though they were inside a federal building and near a publicly-used elevator. Agents also took photos of reportersā press credentials with their cellphones in what could only be described as an intimidation tactic.
Wearing ski masks and baseball caps, the federal agents came decked up in bulletproof vests, and some even wore sleeves to hide their tattoos. Some ICE agents physically fled out of sight when amNewYork aimed a camera at them.
Thereās also a quote from the city comptroller where he says the judge told a young woman in the US from Guatemala who had filed an asylum application that sheāll be granted a hearing in February 2027 and then ICE detained her when she was leaving the courtroom.
How anyone can see these photos, read all this and still think āah, yes this is fineā I donāt know. But they (g) are lacking in basic human decency and empathy, IMO.
EDIT: Appears to be a neighborhood-level NYC oriented news outlet - https://www.amny.com/contact-us/
AP Stylebook per their own blog post hasnāt used āillegalā to describe an immgirant since April 2013: https://www.apstylebook.com/blog_posts/1?sconvid=27407
More specifically, hereās what it says - only exception is in direct quotations:
illegal immigration Entering or residing in a country in violation of civil or criminal law. Except in direct quotes essential to the story, use illegal only to refer to an action, not a person: illegal immigration , but not illegal immigrant . Acceptable variations include living in or entering a country illegally or without legal permission.
Except in direct quotations, do not use the terms illegal alien , an illegal , illegals or undocumented .
Do not describe people as violating immigration laws without attribution.
Specify wherever possible how someone entered the country illegally and from where. Crossed the border? Overstayed a visa? What nationality?
People who were brought into the country as children should not be described as having immigrated illegally. For people granted a temporary right to remain in the U.S. under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, use temporary resident status , with details on the program lower in the story.
I donāt. Thereās a difference between watching it and a link popping up on an internet search. I was wondering how long it would be until someone pounced all over that.
I googled āchildren left behind at ICE raidā and that was one of the articles that came up. In spite of the inflammatory headline, the āchildā is 19 and legally an adult. But a headline of āadult not seized in ICE raid because hes a citizenā doesnāt fit the narrative they want to portray.
who cares if he drives. Heās an adult. ICE nor anyone else has no responsibilty to do anything with him unless he asks them to. Heās not a child.
the younger child was left with an adult. Not left alone. They have feet, they are able to leave. there is also public transportation in that area. And access to phones to call for a ride. Ultimately those decisions are left up to the adult. The 19 year old.
I think you missed the sarcasm and silly emoji.
Funny given youāre more prone than I to dragging topics across multiple threads.
My joke mustāve touched a nerve. Didnāt say that shoe was for you but if it fits, lace that up and wear it.