Is Friesian a draft horse or warmblood?

[QUOTE=chicki;2226778]

I was simply telling you how they are classified by the breeding authority on that studbook. Anyways…you can enter arabs and tbs into different registries,…I don’t consider them crosses. A horses breed is what it is registered as. I don’t there there is any definition of horse breed that states: breeds are only those which have a closed studbook".[/QUOTE]

I would refer you to Sandro Hit http://www.schockemoehle.com/englisch/s333938.html who is a very influential sire across the warmblood registries. He is registered Oldenburg and approved in many registries including Hanoverian. By your definition any Hanoverian registered mares offspring by him would not qualify as a Hanoverian?
Tbs and Arabs can be entered in to open registries (those producing crosses) generally for improvement. TB and Arabian registries do not allow registration of outside blood (closed books) which is the only way to ensure that common traits are produced.

There is no doubt that TBs and Arabs exhibit common breed characteristics but there is a long way to go before you can claim the definition of “breed” for warmblood registries;

What is a breed?

The classic definition of a “breed” is usually stated as a variation of this statement.

Animals that, through selection and breeding, have come to resemble one another and pass those traits uniformly to their offspring.

Unfortunately this definition leaves some unanswered questions. For example, when is a crossbred animal considered a composite breed and when do we stop thinking about them as composites? Perhaps this definition from The Genetics of Populations by Jay L. Lush helps explain why a good definition of “breed” is elusive.

A breed is a group of domestic animals, termed such by common consent of the breeders, … a term which arose among breeders of livestock, created one might say, for their own use, and no one is warranted in assigning to this word a scientific definition and in calling the breeders wrong when they deviate from the formulated definition. It is their word and the breeders common usage is what we must accept as the correct definition.

As you can see from Dr. Lush’s definition it is at least in part the perception of the breeders and the livestock industry which decides when a group of individuals constitutes a “breed”.

The development of the breeds takes different routes also. In some breeds you can see the amount of change that can occur as the result of selection for a small number of traits. As an example, Holstein cattle have been selected primarily for milk production and are the highest milk producing cattle in the world. Other breeds have traits that result from natural selection pressure based upon the environment in which they were developed. An example of this might be the N’dama cattle from west Africa. These animals have, through the centuries, developed a resistance to trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness spread by the tse-tse fly, which is fatal to most other breeds of cattle.

[QUOTE=Black Forest;2226766]
You mention Hackneys in your last post - NOWHERE in England is a Hackney considered a Warmblood (nowhere anywhere in the world)

So maybe you should go and find out what a Warmblood actually is before you screech “DUUUHHHH” !

A Hackney a Warmblood :winkgrin: :winkgrin: :smiley:

That’s the best joke I have heard this year[/QUOTE] So tell me which you think it is then? A hot blood? A cold blood?

:eek:

[QUOTE=Thomas_1;2226837]
So tell me which you think it is then? A hot blood? A cold blood?[/QUOTE]:eek: Oh my god… He HONESTLY believes a Hackney is a Warmblood :eek:

And rightly so…

The origins of the Hackney as we know it began in Norfolk, England where the horses called Norfolk Trotters had been selectively bred for elegant style and speed. Seeking to improve on both counts, breeders mated the Norfolk mares to grandsons of the foundation sires of the Thoroughbred. The first Hackney as we know the breed today is said to be The Shale’s Horse, foaled in 1760. During the next 50 years, the Hackney was developed as a special breed.

He was one of THE FIRST warmbloods.

http://www.hackney-horse.org.uk/history.asp

For the hackney - consider trying to talk about the Yorkshire Roadster and Tom Ryder too!

What we consider warmbloods are just a little further down the evolutionary road than a first cross, but not as far along as what we regard as a breed, ie the closed books of TBs, Hackneys, etc. But it is nonetheless, still a cross.

[QUOTE=chicki;2226782]
Black forest…can you tell us the universally accepted defintion of warmblood?[/QUOTE]

Use a ticklist:

  1. Is it registered (or able to be registered) in the main book of a Warmblood Society that sticks to to universally accepted rules? I say "able to be registered because a foal that is never registered but could have been had the owners bothered is still a Warmblood.

  2. Has it got a minimum of 3 full generations of approved Warmblood (ie sire passed his inspection and performance test with an accepted WB breed society and so did his sire and the sire of the dam etc etc etc) or Warmblood approved TB / Arab / Anglo-Arab blood (with the emphasis on APPROVED)

The whole thing is about selection selection and more selection. That’s what made the Warmbloods we have today, which don’t seem to be doing too badly considering

Regarding the “Warmblood Breeds” - If you take the whole of the mainstream Warmblood breeds a an Umbrella and call that “Warmblood” - and then consider the different studbooks that fall under that umbrella “the Warmblood registries” then it comes close.

Yes, they do accept each others blood to an extent if requirements are fulfilled (not just as easily as people seem to think and some are very strict (Trakehner, Holsteiner) and some are more open (RPSI etc) but they all stick to the same basic rules (and then add some of their own.) Some have higher requirements for “outside” stallions (say when a Hannoverian is coming forward for Oldenburg approval) - for example several will accept a 70 day performance test of 80 points for their own, 90 points for an outside WB and 100 Points for a TB stallion.

Some only acept their own (plus approved xx or ox blood) in the first 6 generations and not even tolerate any other WB blood (Trakehner)

It’s not one big mixing pot - there are a lot of differences depending on the specific goal of each registry.

I think one of the main reasons such arguments come about is that “Warmblood” as in a horse belonging to a Warmblood Breed/ Registry - and “warmblooded” in the sense of not coldblooded / not hotblooded are mixed up hopelessly by some …

This, luckily, is only your opinion? There is no such thing as a warmblood breed. They are a cross and will remain so until they close their books and refine their breed characteristics for a few hundred more years, like the Hackney!

Interesting article on breeding objectives for warmblood sporthorses; http://www.wbfsh.org/docs/koenen.pdf
It would also be worth noting that a bigger market share, for individual registries, can be ensured by keeping books open.

OMG - I am so confused…

Okay first off I agree with the other posters that the word draft does not imply that the animals we are referencing was designed to pull a plough. I have always thought of a Friesian as a carriage type as well but I am not upset at all by someone thinking that they are a light heavy draft type either.

I have always considered a Hanoverian a breed but it’s not? It’s a cross? I am confused by what exactly you mean when you say cross, please explain.

I think someone had mentioned a new warmblood encyclopedia that was very imformative - anyone know the title? I would be interested in checking it out!

Thanks!

[QUOTE=Auventera Two;2226790]
That’s not true at all. With warmbloods, you can have a purebred, lets say, Hanoverian, but that horse can be presented, and approved by the Oldenburg registry if he/she meets the requirements of that registry.

With Quarter Horses, you could have a purebred QH but register it with the IBHA if it is a Buckskin or Dun. Doesn’t make a cross, just makes it eligible for registration with a 2nd registry because it was able to meet the qualifications set by that governing body.[/QUOTE]

This post makes sense to me.

Suggest you read the entire thread.

I did and became more confused as I read on!

“With warmbloods, you can have a purebred, lets say, Hanoverian”

Define purebred Hanoverian?

Colour registries are an American anathema.

For what it’s worth

From the encylopedia of the Horse.
The Friesian is one of Europe’s oldest horses and down the centuries it has had an influence on a number of other breeds, notably the Oldenburg, Britains Fell and Dales ponies. The remains of an ancient coldblood type of heavy horse from which the modern Friesian is believed to be decended are from Friesland in the north of the Netherlands. Eastern blood introduced during the time of the Crusades had an influence on the development of the Friesian as did the Andulusian during the Eighty Years’ War, when the Netherlands were occupied by the Spanish. The Friesian horse was developed for suitablility on the land but with his high-stepping trot was outcrossed to trotters during the nineteenth century. This led to the Friesian becoming lighter in build and less useful as a farm animal.

This is what I posted on the other thread and is applicable here:

"When you break down the classification of all horses into either cold blood, warm blood, or hot blood, …

I’ve long posted that the quarterhorse is a warmblood as is the american mustang. DNA bloodtyping has proven that the spanish barb is present in ALL european warmbloods as well as the more likey forefathers of the TB (vs the arab). It has also proved that the barb is the foundation of the mustang.

European warmbloods were developed by using particular stallions on a more native mare base - WHATEVER that mare base tended to be. For example, that mare base in germany was the light plow/farm horse while in France, the mare base was more TB, arab and norman based.

In all the european countries there was a healthy dose of Irish Draught, Cleveland Bay, Friesian, and spanish horses mixed in. Same in the U.S with the development of the Morgan (many think is friesian based), quarter horse and others."

To expand it further, the Trakehner was based on horses mostly used for the cavelry with a lot of arab and TB mixed in especially on the mare side.

So you see, most regions started off crossing a style of stallion on their own particular mare base (different in a lot of different places JUST LIKE IN AMERICA). The results became either fancy carrage horses or cavelry horses that were then refined into a back engined sport type horse (Just like in America).

The europeans do NOT have a lock down on what is a warmblood style horse. They just organized it into their breeding societies. Americans were then brainwashed into thinking that they have been breeding that particular style horse for hundreds of years when they have only been breeding that style of horse since after they recovered from the world wars - 1940’s or so. Americans, England and France have actually been breeding horses soley for the sports for much longer than that.

Chickie with all due respect, you have a lot to learn. The Hanoverian is NOT a breed. An registered/approved/branded hanoverian can be 1/2 tb or even 1/2 arab or even 1/2 Trakehner among other things. That is NOT a breed. It is a type and the ONLY thing that makes it a hanoverian is that someone paid a hanoverian inspector to SAY it is. PERIOD.

The Dutch have been breeding horses for the current popular sport for just as long as the Americans, England and France. In the late 1800’s/early 1900’s the most popular sport was DRIVING, show jumping and modern dressage competition were just being invented (well, and in America horse shows also featured Saddle Horses, aka Saddlebreds, Saddle Horse shows in America are older than Baseball!). Some of the best driving horses in the world at that time were Dutch, in 1901 the stallion Roland, foaled in 1889 in the Dutch province of Groningen, was named the World Champion Carriage Horse at the World Agricultural Exposition in Paris.

Steeplechasing was around longer.

[QUOTE=tri;2227220]
Steeplechasing was around longer.[/QUOTE]

Steeplechasing is a form of racing, not a form of horse showing. And European countries such as Germany, the Netherlands, Austria and Hungary have been breeding their own breeds of horses to suit their purposes for hundreds of years. To the poster who said their are still breeds breeding the old style Oldenburg, the type that existed pre-WWI and between WWI and WWII and before it was changed into what it is today, do you have any pics? I love those old Oldenburgs! Horses like Gambo (1927) were such cool horses.

Chickie with all due respect, you have a lot to learn. The Hanoverian is NOT a breed. An registered/approved/branded hanoverian can be 1/2 tb or even 1/2 arab or even 1/2 Trakehner among other things. That is NOT a breed. It is a type and the ONLY thing that makes it a hanoverian is that someone paid a hanoverian inspector to SAY it is. PERIOD.

You crack me up tri. You are of course, the authority on everything to do with warmblood breeding. Forgive me.:rolleyes:

It says, right on the german website of the hanoverian association…that the hanoverian horse is a BREED. I aint pulling this out of my as* .

I think you people who are SO convinced that a horse is not a breed because it accepts improvement blood are simply wrong. Every breed of horse in existance was crossed with something at some piont …and they are all still considered breeds. What I do find, is that the same people who want to put the name “warmblood” on their draft crosses like to convince themselves that there really is no such thing as a breed of warmblood horse…NO…they are all just grade horses. Pulease.

And on top of that…if you can’t have a breed of horse that is warmblood in type…than you can’t have breed’s that are hotblooded in type if they have ever had studbooks that were open to any degree at all.

A horse is the breed it is registered with. It fit’s the inspection criterion of the system. If Sandro hit has been approved for Hanoverian as an improvement…and because of his breeding, then a foal out of him born to an approved hanoverian mare is a hanoverian horse. If the system is somewhat different from the system used by arab breeders ect…yeah fine, but there is a breed called hanoverian and it’s ridiculous to argue otherwise…the studbook is not closed BUT it is not totally open either.

[B]Use a ticklist:

  1. Is it registered (or able to be registered) in the main book of a Warmblood Society that sticks to to universally accepted rules? I say "able to be registered because a foal that is never registered but could have been had the owners bothered is still a Warmblood.

  2. Has it got a minimum of 3 full generations of approved Warmblood (ie sire passed his inspection and performance test with an accepted WB breed society and so did his sire and the sire of the dam etc etc etc) or Warmblood approved TB / Arab / Anglo-Arab blood (with the emphasis on APPROVED)[/B]
    HEY, well by that definition…the friesian would fit in perfectly, not that I am adamant it is a warmblood…but it sure as hell aint a cold or hot blooded breed of horse. Simple as that.