:mad:
Jesus Christ (sorry to those that find that phrase offensive, but my mother use its frequently in anger!) get a life, you people fighting over how many, and what for, and how common, and how easy to be “tested for” and all the rest of the crap that apparently defends current racing practice in this country.
The North American racing circuit (sorry to place you in such global terms, and I’m sure some egocentrism is bound to result) is the ONLY major racing jurisdiction in the world that permits ANY of this crap to be injected into/injested by its racehorses legally at any level.
Racing can be just as wonderful as an experience without ANY of this crap. Push to get rid of it (drugs) completely (irrespective of the details and I won’t comment on those for the Asmussen “ban”) or admit that your industry is full of it and you don’t care. Period. But get a grip. Figure it out. The horses don’t need it. The industry sure as hell doesn’t need it. And the origins of admitting it are pathetic and not rationalized by subsequent data on number of starts, longevity of horse careers, or anything else…except bad publicity for the industry. Congrats, north american racing.
PS. My father, a lifelong fan of track and field athletics ( I was a participant as a teen and he was a trainer), will no longer watch competitive track and field. He is boycotting coverage of the olypmpics. WHY? Drugs.